What's new

Pakistan defies ICJ order, won't grant consular access to India in Kulbhushan Jadhav case

.
Thats what your compatriot says not me.
Well what my fellow countryman said was we are treating your personal as a Military officer conducting terrorist operations in our country. And you somehow diverted the discussion to Geneva convention.
Whatever you guys will do . One thing is Crystal clear we won't be leaving Cmdr Jadav soon. So India has three options :-
1) To perform Military action to save it's personal. The effects of any Military Action will be massive Pakistani retaliation. And will be escalated in go full fledged war. We have seen it after Mumbai and Pathankot attacks India won't do that as they know the scale of disaster awaiting them.
2) Offer Pakistan specially Pakistan Army something big which will attract Pakistan Army to release Cmdr Jadav. Similar to what USA offered to ISI for Raymond Davis.
3) forget about him and go on with your happy live ;)
 
.
Read this to get the other side of the picture...even if you don't believe what is written. Also read 'who killed Karkare' written by SM Mushrif. or just the synopsis...

I am not big fan of conspiracies theories except entertaining myself now and then.

Read confessions of Information minister Sherry Rehman, your NSA Durrani and offcourse Geo investigations.

Moreover, the nationality is never contested by your government and we have been told that the Pak investigations have raided the location from which operation was conducted.

Your government would not even agree to investigate in Pakistan if those attackers were from India or Somalia.
 
.
ahhh consular access right. so where does counsular access amounts to terming the trial unfair by icj??
ICJ haven't heard merits of this case but since there is no access to the accused we dont really know what is the evidence against him how that evidence was collected so one only has Pakistani govts word for it which itself is the party to this case.
 
. .
.
Nopes, it means you have very poor comprehension skills.
then why don't prove your comprehension skills and elaborate on what grounds you want rights under the convention for kbj. I don't mind leaning and polishing my comprehension skills from you.
 
.
Interesting read here...

From Sarabjit to Jadhav: A history of Indian spies in Pakistan

Sarabjit Singh
Sarabjit Singh was arrested by Pakistani authorities in August 1990. At the time, India said that an inebriated 27-year-old Singh had strayed across the border while ploughing his field.

Kashmir Singh
Kashmir Singh was a convicted Indian spy on death row and spent 35 years in prison in Pakistan. Throughout his incarceration, he insisted he was not a spy. He was arrested in 1973.

58eb9228c25ff.jpg

Kashmir Singh receives a hero's welcome on his return to India. -BBC


Singh was pardoned by then President Pervez Musharraf and returned to India where he was given a hero's welcome.

“I was a spy and did my duty,” admitted Singh after crossing the border, the Press Trust of India news agency reported,

Ravindra Kaushik
Ravindra Kaushik was born in India's Rajasthan and was recruited by the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) while working as a theatre artist.

After receiving two years of training, he was sent to Pakistan in 1975, where he enrolled in Karachi University under the alias of Nabi Ahmad Shakir.

After graduation, Kaushik joined the Pakistan Army as a commissioned officer and got promoted to the rank of Major.

During 1979-83, he passed on sensitive information to RAW.


https://www.dawn.com/news/1326121/from-sarabjit-to-jadhav-a-history-of-indian-spies-in-pakistan


https://www.dawn.com/news/1326121/from-sarabjit-to-jadhav-a-history-of-indian-spies-in-pakistan
 
.
. . . .
then why don't prove your comprehension skills and elaborate on what grounds you want rights under the convention for kbj. I don't mind leaning and polishing my comprehension skills from you.

I can give it a try only if you are willing else its all waste of time.

Lets go step by step -
1- One is not an spy unless its proven in court.
2- Unless proven, one is innocent.
3- An innocent need to be provided fair trial and his choice of defence.
4- Viena Convention safeguard his rights.
5- Even if he is a serving armed force officer and raising war on pakistan, he shall be treated as per geneva convention.

Now tell me who were the defence lawyer for him and for what specific terror act he is sentenced to death.

Infact ICJ has explained in great details in #30 of its detailed order, clearly indicating, prima facie, that Pakistan action might have violated article 36 of Viena Convention and did not considered KBY being an alleged spy as an argument of him not falling under Viena Convention ambit.

Your whole argument lies with "He is a spy and a terrorist" but was the process which declared him so fair? Lot of explanations need to be given on this front and ICJ may deep dive into the same in upcoming hearings.
 
.
Even if there is any truth to the fake passport drama (which I doubt )- there is no proof of him being a terrorist.
I have no interest trying to convince or 'fool' any one here- we are discussing an issue, so treat it like a discussion. Calm yourself boy.
good. fake passport, caught in Pakistan, confessed to his crimes, Terrorists arrested confessed their relations with kalboshan, ex indian army soldier(indian claim) using fake identity. All points towards one thing. He is a terrorist.
By the way fake passport issue is not that simple like you made it.
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom