Pakistan Charges Hafiz Saeed With Terror Financing

[war&peace]

Express Tribune is reporting it.

He was under house arrest for quite some time.

 

[Rank]

He is a global terrorist ,they still consider him a philanthropist.

You are expecting a lot.

lol what he did at 'global' level by the way ??

 

[SIPRA]

He was under house arrest for quite some time.

Yes. But today CTD has registered certain cases of terror financing, against them. Though, I think, nothing would come out of these cases.

 

[lightoftruth]

lol what he did at 'global' level by the way ??

Why not ask United Nations ?

He is a UN designated Global Terrorist.
https://www.business-standard.com/a...d-terrorists-govt-sources-119030700636_1.html

 

[Zee-shaun]

I would be glad if that is the case.
For now i remain skeptical as no concrete irreversible step has been taken so far thus it begs the question if its just a show to escape FATF.
Hopefully i will be proven wrong.

Do you realise that there is no permanent scape from FATF? Previous civil govts are responsible for the situation we are in today. Finally we have a leader who has the guts to stand up against extremism and take legal actions without fearing for his own life. Yet you remain sceptical....

I am quite certain that no harm will come to Hafiz Saeed Sahib. The issue at hand is quite complex and has many facets. Needs to be tackled very carefully.

The guy is terminally ill and hasn't got much time. Whatever life he has left, he will spend it in and out of court proceedings. No harm will come to him.

 

[SIPRA]

The guy is terminally ill and hasn't got much time. Whatever life he has left, he will spend it in and out of court proceedings. No harm will come to him.

I believe, you are confusing Hafiz Sahib with Maulana Masood Azhar. Hafiz Saeed Sahib is quite healthy. But you are right that there would be prolonged and futile court proceedings, with hardly any result. And the time will pass.

 

[Jackdaws]

Indeed if modi just call him once ...he will do it...He is trying to reach Modi by writing letters and making phone calls..
Believe it ,IK is the most friendly PM india will have in Pakistan and having public support..

Lol.

 

[Solomon2]

Yes. But today CTD has registered certain cases of terror financing, against them. Though, I think, nothing would come out of these cases.

Why not?

 

[SIPRA]

Why not?

Why should or would?

 

[Zee-shaun]

I believe, you are confusing Hafiz Sahib with Maulana Masood Azhar. Hafiz Saeed Sahib is quite healthy. But you are right that there would be prolonged and futile court proceedings, with hardly any result. And the time will pass.

I believe both are ill but I could be wrong.

 

[SIPRA]

I believe both are ill but I could be wrong.

I have not heard any news that Hafiz Saeed Sahib is ill; though of course he is an aged person and may be having some common age-related health problems.

 

[Rank]

Why not ask United Nations ?

He is a UN designated Global Terrorist.
https://www.business-standard.com/a...d-terrorists-govt-sources-119030700636_1.html

oh comeon we know how world politics work.. today you're blue eyed of United States tomorrow someone else... tell me what he has done @ global level ...

 

[lightoftruth]

oh comeon we know how world politics work.. today you're blue eyed of United States tomorrow someone else... tell me what he has done @ global level ...

Victims of just nariman house of 26/11 terror attacks by Hafiz Saeed.

Name Age Nationality
Rabbi Gavriel Holtzberg 29 Brooklyn, United States (and dual Israeli citizenship)
Rebbetzin Rivka Holtzberg 28 Afula, Israel
Bentzion Kruman 26 Bat Yam, Israel (and dual US citizenship)
Rabbi Leibish Teitelbaum 37 Brooklyn, United States
Yoheved Orpaz 62 Givatayim, Israel
Norma Shvarzblat Rabinovich 50

Mexico

 

[Zee-shaun]

Why not ask United Nations ?

He is a UN designated Global Terrorist.
https://www.business-standard.com/a...d-terrorists-govt-sources-119030700636_1.html

Do you listen to the UN?

 

[Solomon2]

Why should or would?

You don't have confidence that the gov't wouldn't have booked a case against H.S. if it didn't feel it had the evidence to convict him? Or is your question, "Even if the gov't does have such evidence, why should H.S. be convicted at all?"