A pathetic case, with information extracted by third degree methods: one case, as claimed by Pakistan, in seventy years, against literally dozens every month coming the other way. One unarmed individual kidnapped from Iran, against armed to the teeth terrorists shot down weekly in Kashmir. And let's not forget the rest of the picture.
A case built on an insecure personality promoted beyond his level bragging about mythical Walter Mitty-like exploits in foreign countries, against the testimony of an array of the best and brightest Pakistani military and civilian sources, speaking on Pakistani media, and writing in publications published in Pakistan.
Other than the national need to promote an Indo-Pakistan equation, does anybody seriously believe in Indian involvement in Pakistani terrorism? Is there not sufficient evidence that all the damage that could be done was done by Pakistani brains and intelligence alone?
How long will you keep up this drama?
And no, we are not providing guns and training to anybody. Other than Indian soldiers and armed policemen.
I agree with those who have noticed that you make sensible and balanced comments, and have in general a balanced point of view: it is nice that some, and soon many more, will agree with me. But I must join issue with some of your observations, that represent Pakistani urban legend produced as fact.
In this post, it is not Indian nuclear weapons that prevent Pakistan from taking Indian administered Kashmir back. It is standard orthodox Indian military strength. Efforts at fomenting terrorism and winning over the Kashmiri did not succeed in 1965, such efforts peaked twice in recent decades, once during the 90s, once less than a year ago, and in normally sub-normal conditions, infiltrators from the Punjab and a handful of local youngsters lose their lives to Indian security forces within weeks of deployment.
