Safriz
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2010
- Messages
- 20,845
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
UNITED NATIONS: A senior Pakistani
diplomat told the UN that a lack of
consensus in the Conference on
Disarmament (CD) on negotiating a
treaty to ban the production of fissile
material used as fuel for nuclear weapons could not be attributed to the position of one state -- Pakistan -- as claimed by some western
delegates. "The CD is not a body to negotiate only one item on its agenda: FMCT
(Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty)", Pakistani delegate Ambassador Zamir
Akram said in a speech to the General Assembly's First Committee,
which deals with disarmament and international security matters. "If there is no consensus on negotiating FMCT, there is also no
consensus on negotiating Nuclear Disarmament, Negative Security
Assurances or PAROS (prevention of an outer space arms race)," said
Ambassador Akram, who is Pakistan's permanent representative to the
UN's European offices in Geneva, as he set the record straight. Over the past few years, Pakistan has been blocking the launching of
negotiations on the proposed US-backed treaty in the Geneva-based CD
on the ground that it is prejudicial to its national security interests. The Conference has 65 members. Speaking in the general debate,
Ambassador Akram referred to what he called "contrived lament" over
the failure of the disarmament machinery, and said in Pakistan's view,
the diagnosis was partial and focused almost exclusively on symptoms
rather than causes. Even worse, he noted that the solutions put forward were selective,
discriminatory and inconsistent. For an objective evaluation of the causes underlying the impasse at the
Conference on Disarmament, he said it was important to acknowledge
the following: the Conference's work was a reflection of prevailing
political realities; no treaty could be negotiated in the Conference that
was contrary to the security interests of its member states; the lack of
progress could not be attributed to the rules of procedure; and the Conference had four core issues on its agenda -- nuclear disarmament,
negative security assurances or prevention of an outer space arms race. In this contest, Ambassador Akram called for addressing the security
concerns of all members of the Conference. He said the problems in the
Conference were not of an organizational nature, but related to the
external political environment, and the challenges facing the
international disarmament agenda and the machinery were not
exclusive to the Conference. The United Nations International Drug Control Programme and the First
Committee confronted similar difficulties, he said, wondering why the
Conference alone was blamed for their inaction. Referring to the deteriorating global security environment,
Ambassador Akram said new weapons systems were being developed
and deployed, including anti-ballistic missile systems in several parts of
the world, as well as the indiscriminate use of drones. Other worrying trends included the growing weaponization of outer
space and the hostile use of cyber-technologies. The production of conventional weapons with destructive capacity
equal to nuclear weapons would be dangerously destabilizing and
would increase the temptation to respond with use of nuclear
weapons. An agreed approach, he said, must be evolved for the promotion of the
peaceful uses of nuclear energy under appropriate international
safeguards. Until nuclear disarmament was achieved, non-nuclear-weapon States
should be given assurances that they would not be threatened with
nuclear weapons and those assurances should be translated into a
legally-binding treaty. An agreement was also needed to address concerns arising from anti-
ballistic missile systems, which were inherently destabilizing, the
Pakistani delegate said. There was also a need to strengthen the international legal regime in
order to prevent the militarization of outer space. As a pragmatic step towards disarmament, the nuclear-weapon States
should halt future production and eliminate all stocks of fissile
materials through a fissile material treaty. The move should be based on the premise of the recognition of the
right to equal security for all States, which was a critical prerequisite
for progress in areas of arms control and disarmament, Ambassador
Akram said. Measures should also address the motives that drove States to acquire
weapons to defend themselves, including perceived threats from
superior forces and discrimination in the application of international
norms. Finally, he urged nuclear-weapon States to demonstrate a renewed
commitment to achieve nuclear disarmament within a reasonable
timeframe, with the eventual objective, the total elimination of nuclear
weapons. Copyright APP (Associated Press of Pakistan), 2012
diplomat told the UN that a lack of
consensus in the Conference on
Disarmament (CD) on negotiating a
treaty to ban the production of fissile
material used as fuel for nuclear weapons could not be attributed to the position of one state -- Pakistan -- as claimed by some western
delegates. "The CD is not a body to negotiate only one item on its agenda: FMCT
(Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty)", Pakistani delegate Ambassador Zamir
Akram said in a speech to the General Assembly's First Committee,
which deals with disarmament and international security matters. "If there is no consensus on negotiating FMCT, there is also no
consensus on negotiating Nuclear Disarmament, Negative Security
Assurances or PAROS (prevention of an outer space arms race)," said
Ambassador Akram, who is Pakistan's permanent representative to the
UN's European offices in Geneva, as he set the record straight. Over the past few years, Pakistan has been blocking the launching of
negotiations on the proposed US-backed treaty in the Geneva-based CD
on the ground that it is prejudicial to its national security interests. The Conference has 65 members. Speaking in the general debate,
Ambassador Akram referred to what he called "contrived lament" over
the failure of the disarmament machinery, and said in Pakistan's view,
the diagnosis was partial and focused almost exclusively on symptoms
rather than causes. Even worse, he noted that the solutions put forward were selective,
discriminatory and inconsistent. For an objective evaluation of the causes underlying the impasse at the
Conference on Disarmament, he said it was important to acknowledge
the following: the Conference's work was a reflection of prevailing
political realities; no treaty could be negotiated in the Conference that
was contrary to the security interests of its member states; the lack of
progress could not be attributed to the rules of procedure; and the Conference had four core issues on its agenda -- nuclear disarmament,
negative security assurances or prevention of an outer space arms race. In this contest, Ambassador Akram called for addressing the security
concerns of all members of the Conference. He said the problems in the
Conference were not of an organizational nature, but related to the
external political environment, and the challenges facing the
international disarmament agenda and the machinery were not
exclusive to the Conference. The United Nations International Drug Control Programme and the First
Committee confronted similar difficulties, he said, wondering why the
Conference alone was blamed for their inaction. Referring to the deteriorating global security environment,
Ambassador Akram said new weapons systems were being developed
and deployed, including anti-ballistic missile systems in several parts of
the world, as well as the indiscriminate use of drones. Other worrying trends included the growing weaponization of outer
space and the hostile use of cyber-technologies. The production of conventional weapons with destructive capacity
equal to nuclear weapons would be dangerously destabilizing and
would increase the temptation to respond with use of nuclear
weapons. An agreed approach, he said, must be evolved for the promotion of the
peaceful uses of nuclear energy under appropriate international
safeguards. Until nuclear disarmament was achieved, non-nuclear-weapon States
should be given assurances that they would not be threatened with
nuclear weapons and those assurances should be translated into a
legally-binding treaty. An agreement was also needed to address concerns arising from anti-
ballistic missile systems, which were inherently destabilizing, the
Pakistani delegate said. There was also a need to strengthen the international legal regime in
order to prevent the militarization of outer space. As a pragmatic step towards disarmament, the nuclear-weapon States
should halt future production and eliminate all stocks of fissile
materials through a fissile material treaty. The move should be based on the premise of the recognition of the
right to equal security for all States, which was a critical prerequisite
for progress in areas of arms control and disarmament, Ambassador
Akram said. Measures should also address the motives that drove States to acquire
weapons to defend themselves, including perceived threats from
superior forces and discrimination in the application of international
norms. Finally, he urged nuclear-weapon States to demonstrate a renewed
commitment to achieve nuclear disarmament within a reasonable
timeframe, with the eventual objective, the total elimination of nuclear
weapons. Copyright APP (Associated Press of Pakistan), 2012
