Pakistan backs India for non-permanent UN Security Council seat

[New World]

No it's a Human Kashmir whose CM does not have the power of a Chaparasi.

so, it means that india is off aaadi wasi people,

 

[El Sidd]

1. Why we are not same people?.... associating ourselves with Turks, Arab just to justify our partition from India does not make it a Truth....how many Arab/Turk descendants are among us...and what about millions who migrated from India to Pakistan?

Betterment of Kashmiris is in their development.....Rather than keep harping bout IOK...What about we develop our part of Kashmir so that it can give a real message to people of IOK than we genuinely care about Kashmiris...and are not just hungry for Water.

People of IOK die each day for Pakistan. They value Pakistan more than people who live in Pakistan.

Ask those millions who migrated from India and they will tell you even in India they were refereed to as Turkulu or Arabs.

 

[baajey]

whats the big deal? its goddamn "non-permanent" and india was in this position for seven times.
but thanks to pak and china in particular.

 

[313ghazi]

Such a chavli by IK and GoP.

Why back India for this temporary position, knowing full well it's position in Kashmir and the gross abuse of human rights of Indian Muslims. When it comes to diplomacy he's such a doormat. I can't wait for cuckold behaviour to to burn up in his face, as it will. Small moves like this might help project soft power with smaller irrelevant countries, project an image of a cooperative Pakistan vs and uncooperative India but at the same time, when it comes to it, India has the backing of the USA and they'll never back any solution in Kashmir - India is their new dog, we are the old dog.

 

[Cornered Tiger]

Nothing serious, Its a rotating position among Asia-Pacific countries. Pakistan will also have its turn as had previously, where India voted for Pakistan as well. Non issue.

 

[nahtanbob]

Such a chavli by IK and GoP.

Why back India for this temporary position, knowing full well it's position in Kashmir and the gross abuse of human rights of Indian Muslims. When it comes to diplomacy he's such a doormat. I can't wait for cuckold behaviour to to burn up in his face, as it will. Small moves like this might help project soft power with smaller irrelevant countries, project an image of a cooperative Pakistan vs and uncooperative India but at the same time, when it comes to it, India has the backing of the USA and they'll never back any solution in Kashmir - India is their new dog, we are the old dog.

you should study the politics of voting in the UN and other international bodies. If countries in your neighborhood do not back you nobody will. it runs both ways for both India and Pakistan.

 

[Cobra Arbok]

Nothing serious, Its a rotating position among Asia-Pacific countries. Pakistan will also have its turn as had previously, where India voted for Pakistan as well. Non issue.

Yeah being a non-permanent member of the UNSC is not a very powerful position either, no more powers than any other UN committee yields. Both India and Pakistan are smart enough to know it isn't worth starting an Indo-Pak fight over something as minor as this.

 

[CHACHA"G"]

Oye Chacha G eh koi gul nahi simple politics of Asia Pacific group to secure seat for its member we won in 2012-13 and india voted for us that time aab baqi sab idhar apni local politics khelna start supporting own parties alag issue
https://tribune.com.pk/story/279024...permanent-member-seat-on-un-security-council/

I got it they voted for us back then , now it is our turn …..