Pakistan Army's Resistance in 1965 - Psychological Impact on IA brass.

[Pakistani shaheens]

" Aap ki sari tarikh dekho, Eak dusro khi gardhano kaatne per mushtamil hai." This is what your own Hassan Nisar sir has said about your tarikh.

Hassan nisar is working for geo news so one can expect such things from him.
NO NEED TO WORRY!!!

 

[RiazHaq]

I am sorry sir, I just have to disagree with you here. Even if an Indian Defense Minister said that Pakistanis could have traveled to Delhi, if they had broken through Indian defenses on banks of River Beas, that was still a speculation about a hypothetical scenario. We can not make thread titles about speculations on top of hypothetical scenarios especially when the body of the text is vastly different. Such Titles make for massive trolling and headaches.

It's poster's choice to tile it, not yours. You are abusing your status as a mod to change it. As to trolls, they are dime a dozen and need no excuse to do trolling. Your job is to stop the trolls, not change the content or title of a perfectly valid post based on a serious book relying on the diaries of India's defense minister in 1965.

 

[Slayer786]

Its ' feel Good' week again ?

Accept it with a pinch of salt. Just gulp it down quickly. This was pain will be less.

 

[AUSTERLITZ]

I really have 2 words for this thread.Asal uttar.Google it.You will know what happened to the wannabe conquerors of delhi.

 

[alpha q]

Your logic and reasoning has no place here!

Yeah because you people love to live in delusional and conspiracy stricken world.

 

[ROCKING]

Yeah because you people love to live in delusional and conspiracy stricken world.

And you are referring to?

 

[alpha q]

And you are referring to?

Oh, missed your.sarcasm, thought you were pakistani.

 

[Mike_Brando]

I really have 2 words for this thread.Asal uttar.Google it.You will know what happened to the wannabe conquerors of delhi.

Mate let's not talk about Asal Uttar as most of the Pakistani posters will say that it was totally a fictional battle and their army was indeed at the gate of Delhi by the time of the ceasefire declaration.They won't even believe all the neutral sources that are currently available in the internet let alone the words from an Indian.We Indians know what happened in Asal Uttar,so i think there is no need to convince some guys who don't want to be waked up from their delusional dreams.

 

[my2cents]

Hassan nisar is working for geo news so one can expect such things from him.
NO NEED TO WORRY!!!

He also said not to look at history with prejudice. If you keep glorifying the barbaric past and ignore the past mistakes then they will come back to haunt you.

 

[longlivepakistan_]

Whatever the debate going on here, I like they way Indians taking interest in Pakistan defence forum and our defence history, I you....
I doubt Indian Forums would have frequent **** visitors

 

[FarmanCH]

its your thinking. And you can think what ever you want.

my dear.. its not my thinking it is FACT....

 

[dil_dil]

I really have 2 words for this thread.Asal uttar.Google it.You will know what happened to the wannabe conquerors of delhi.

Midget bhangi Bongla ki phir se lungi twist.

 

[FarmanCH]

I want to ask a question, For reaching delhi, One need to conquer Punjab and then Haryana or other solution is first Rajasthan and then Haryana, Your army didnt even able to conquer Amritsar. and you talking about Delhi.

"According to Indian claims, at the end of hostilities on 23 September 1965, India held about 200 square miles (518 square kilometres)of Pakistani territory in the Sialkot sector including the towns and villages of Phillora, Deoli, Bajragarhi, Suchetgarh, Pagowal, Chaprar, Muhadpur, Tilakpur,Thro Mandi, Khanpur Sydan, south east and east of Sialkot city, which were returned to Pakistan after the Tashkent Declaration in January 1966. Likewise, by the end of the hostilities, Pakistan held up to 1,600 square miles of Indian territory, of which 1,300 square miles included desert sectors.Despite the "huge losses on both sides", The Australian attributed the victory in this battle to Pakistan"...... by: Rao, K. V. Krishna

I want to ask a question, For reaching delhi, One need to conquer Punjab and then Haryana or other solution is first Rajasthan and then Haryana, Your army didnt even able to conquer Amritsar. and you talking about Delhi.

"According to Indian claims, at the end of hostilities on 23 September 1965, India held about 200 square miles (518 square kilometres)of Pakistani territory in the Sialkot sector including the towns and villages of Phillora, Deoli, Bajragarhi, Suchetgarh, Pagowal, Chaprar, Muhadpur, Tilakpur,Thro Mandi, Khanpur Sydan, south east and east of Sialkot city, which were returned to Pakistan after the Tashkent Declaration in January 1966. Likewise, by the end of the hostilities, Pakistan held up to 1,600 square miles of Indian territory, of which 1,300 square miles included desert sectors.Despite the "huge losses on both sides", The Australian attributed the victory in this battle to Pakistan"...... by: Rao, K. V. Krishna..... Goodmorning dear

 

[qamar1990]

all i see some huriyat guys doing that & this what kashmiri do to them after that

shall i post pics of what kashmiris really do??

 

[AUSTERLITZ]

Midget bhangi Bongla ki phir se lungi twist.

Back shan?Anyway u can always come to india and visit patton nagar at khem karan to see the remnants of pak 1st armoured division.