What's new

Pakistan approves Hindu Marriage Bill after decades of inaction

And what about atheists?
Who would they be allowed to marry.

This is such a slippery slope you are on. A human being should be allowed to marry any other human being by the law. Its laughable that Pakistan by law limits marriage.

Not Pakistan, Islam limits it.

To me inter-religious marriage is disgusting and endogamy is normal..

To you non-muslims endogamy is disgusting but inter-religious marriage is okay.

Its arrogant to judge the social constructs of another community with the social constructs of your own.

If you are asking about the religious point of view which is also part of law as per it's name "Hindu Marriage Bill" or "Muslim Marriage Bill" etc etc, then it becomes a question whether Hinduism or Islam allow such intra-religion marriages. So now we need to ask our selves, which religions does Islam recognize for tying the knot? As far as I know, it allows for marrying into Judaism, Christianity and Islam of course, or collectively called "Ahl-e-kittab", without change of religion on part of the opposite party, whether it be a boy or a girl. In the case of a hindu girl marrying with a Muslim boy or a Hindu boy marrying a Muslim girl, then as per Muslim Marriage Law, then the girl or the boy would have to convert first to any religion that Islam would allow marrying into, ie Christianity, Judaism, Islam etc etc...... similarly as per Hindu Marriage Law, would it be kosher to marry a Muslim boy / Christian boy / Jewish boy or a Muslim girl etc etc, as per Hindu holy texts? If not, then it wouldn't get legal sanctity. Such religious laws are derived from religious texts and are not dependent upon our wishes. If it were up to me, I would ban religion in state matters, but then again, marriage is not a state matter, so let's not make it one.

Muslim girl is not allowed to marry a non muslim whether he be Christian, Jew or Hindu. Muslim girls can only be a Muslim man's wife.

Only Muslim men are allowed to marry Christian or Jew.
 
.
Do enlighten me. Please quote the Quranic verses where it states what you are mentioning.

Muslim girl is not allowed to marry a non muslim whether he be Christian, Jew or Hindu. Muslim girls can only be a Muslim man's wife.

Only Muslim men are allowed to marry Christian or Jew.
 
.
I dont what hav you seen, but from what I get pakistani visa get special treatment everywhere. Most of the planet is aware now where pakistanis excel.

thats just Visa treatments for obvious reason, what happens once someone with easy access to visa gets inside that country is another story, Asking Indians in Australia and Italy and how are some diplomatic staff is treated in NYC thats pure hate for once special visa access race.
 
. .
Should've happened decades ago; the next step would be to have strong Minority Protection Laws in place along with an even stronger enforcement mechanism.
 
.
If it were up to me, I would ban religion in state matters, but then again, marriage is not a state matter, so let's not make it one.

a. YESSSS!!!

b. I MISS YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU........:kiss3:
 
.
we would gladly accept all Hindus and Sikhs without any conditions but pakistanis should take all the muslims living in India
yes sure we will take them along with their land..start it with kashmir and hyderbad :D

This is such a slippery slope you are on. A human being should be allowed to marry any other human being by the law. Its laughable that Pakistan by law limits marriage.
If that is the case then two gays or lesbian are also two human beings who should have this right to marry with each others in India..
 
.
Muslim girl is not allowed to marry a non muslim whether he be Christian, Jew or Hindu. Muslim girls can only be a Muslim man's wife.

Only Muslim men are allowed to marry Christian or Jew.
Historically Muslim men have been allowed to marry with non-Muslim women of another monotheist faith which included Jews and Christianity in past but majority of modern Christians believe in trinity i.e Jesus is God(father), son of God and holy spirit which violate Islamic concept of oneness of God

you already go more than your share, we can throw all of muslims from kashmir also..
We? Its their land as they were not imported from sky so they should come up with their land and property..make all Muslim majority city as part of Pakistan if they are pain for you hinduvata :D
 
.
If that is the case then two gays or lesbian are also two human beings who should have this right to marry with each others in India..

Give it two to three years and gays and lesbians will be allowed to marry in India. Both major political parties and the courts are in agreement. It's now just a question of time.

The state should trust their own citizens to be able to take decisions that are best for themselves. Why interfere in every little thing!
 
.
Give it two to three years and gays and lesbians will be allowed to marry in India. Both major political parties and the courts are in agreement. It's now just a question of time.

The state should trust their own citizens to be able to take decisions that are best for themselves. Why interfere in every little thing!
Why then secular state interfere in choice of eating beef (cow meat) of Non Hindus?

watever was mulla majority was already taken rest of bacteria will be thrown away to porkistan ackthooo
haha what will happen to low castes Indian, Christians and other minorities whom you hinduvata are oppressing as well? How you will get rid of them?. Its not your hindivata forum so behave otherwise you will get pink colour soon
 
.
Why then secular state interfere in choice of eating beef (cow meat) of Non Hindus?

Yeah well - it is what it is- personally I think so long as it does not involve cannibalism or excessive cruelty to an animal all meat should be allowed - if you can eat goat why not cow or pig? - just so you know it was the old Congress government that banned beef purely to score political points But I have to agree with you, that is a silly law.

Hiwever, you cannot use the escuse of one silly law to pass other silly laws :-)
 
.
Yeah well - it is what it is- personally I think so long as it does not involve cannibalism or excessive cruelty to an animal all meat should be allowed - if you can eat goat why not cow or pig? - just so you know it was the old Congress government that banned beef purely to score political points But I have to agree with you, that is a silly law.

Hiwever, you cannot use the escuse of one silly law to pass other silly laws :-)
What i dont like is double standard as you admitted that its silly law against secular principles which limits the personal liberty of individual but many champion of human right here will not oppose it while they are defending the choice of marriage of individual :)
 
.
What i dont like is double standard as you admitted that its silly law against secular principles which limits the personal liberty of individual but many champion of human right here will not oppose it while they are defending the choice of marriage of individual :)
Dude, are you comparing missing out on a beef dish to being forced to convert your religion or give up marrying the person you love?

There is a huge difference here. One is a minor inconvenience the other is a huge deal! Besides tbh if beef is so important to you, it is easily available in the black market in India - so in actual fact no one is missing anything
 
.
Dude, are you comparing missing out on a beef dish to being forced to convert your religion or give up marrying the person you love?

There is a huge difference here. One is a minor inconvenience the other is a huge deal! Besides tbh if beef is so important to you, it is easily available in the black market in India - so in actual fact no one is missing anything
No i am just comparing two free choices whether to eat beef or to marry with every tom, dick , and harry as you guys are saying state should have no rule to interfere in personal choices of individuals.. How do you see state sponsored ghar wapis schemes converting poor illiterate villagers after promising them some incentives ? How they differ with conversion for sake of marriage?

This beef issues took the lives of many people and you are saying its nt serious issues.
 
Last edited:
.
No i am just comparing two free choices whether to eat beef or to marry with every tom, dick , and harry as you guys are saying state should have no rule to interfere in personal choices of individuals.. How do you see state sponsored ghar wapis schemes converting poor illiterate villagers after promising them some incentives ? How they differ with conversion for sake of marriages?
I don't know how much you know about Indian politics, most Pakistanis have a simplistic one sided view.

Sausages and laws in a democracy are made in mysterious ways. Ghar wapsi was a ploy by a political party to bring attention to what they saw as large scale conversions by evangelical Chrisitans in india. They wanted to debate an anti conversion law but being faced with obstacles they did some drama - they took out large scale advertisements claiming that they were converting to Hinduism for money. This lead to a hue and cry and of course they immediately turned around and said then let us pass a law to stop ALL conversions for money. Of course minorities were against that because that is what they had been doing for several years! Buddy this is how democracy works - drama l intrigue and layers of deviousness. There is NO anti conversion law in India right now this was in deference to MINORITIES who objected to any such law.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom