What's new

Featured Pakistan and Uzbekistan deny US military bases for Afghan mission

.
That's just Pakistan and Uzbekistan, there still Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kazakhstan. There is every possibility that zionist-america will find hosts in those countries for military bases.
Russia wont allow it..ultimately its going to be middle east through pakistan airspace or quiet little base in deserted pakistan or even some place in afghanistan(CIA)
 
.
Pakistan should allow US Airspace right under the following conditions:

1) Narrow corridor for ingress and egress into Pakistani airspace
2) Pakistan's full participation in the fusion center in which ever gulf states the drones fly out of
3) SOP defined on authorization process, where Pakistan should have a veto on a drone attack
4) Drones that use Pakistan airspace can only be used against ISIS and TTP, or force protection of US forces
5) Only unmanned UAV allowed. - no other planes manned should be allowed
6) Pakistan should have access to all data from the drones

In return for the above US should provide:

1) Authorization of Heli Engines
2) Removal from FATF Grey List
3) US investment in IT, health and education - as a function of CPEC 2 - lets call it UPEC (min investment of $10B in these areas)
4) US support for return of ill-gotten money and AML efforts

If we can define a deal that looks like the above I think it is worth it. Otherwise it should be a big fat NO!!!
Sounds fair to me.
 
.
I think it is possible if Pakistan keeps a neutral geo-economic posture and responds with its desire to only allow economic presence of these multi-polar powers. I think US has and will suffocate Pakistan economically through terrorists and other fanatics like TLP to fail any geo-economic shift Pakistan needs right now - in a bid that Pakistan will run to US for the breadcrumbs it has to offer Pakistan in exchange for being a mercenary force.
 
.
More dollars per container works.
Doubt we r getting any $$$ per container otherwise state bank would have received that and would have been published

Seems only private entities like ports and distributor is getting money

The advantage of being super power you dont need to pay
Anything
 
.
Doubt we r getting any $$$ per container otherwise state bank would have received that and would have been published

Seems only private entities like ports and distributor is getting money

The advantage of being super power you dont need to pay
Anything

Please do keep in mind that there are ledgers on this side of the deals too. Records are kept of all payments.
 
. .
That's just Pakistan and Uzbekistan, there still Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kazakhstan. There is every possibility that zionist-america will find hosts in those countries for military bases.

Afghanistan shares borders with Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Pakistan, Iran and small portion of China. Kirghizstan and Kazakhstan won't work for them since US would require air space from one of neighboring countries. Less Iran and Turkmenistan all are part of SCO lead by Russia and China. Situation seems tough for US.
 
.
Please do keep in mind that there are ledgers on this side of the deals too. Records are kept of all payments.
Ofcourse but noone counts bribes? Do they?
What matters is what state of USA provided to state of pakistan
And that is an OPEN BOOK
 
.
Ofcourse but noone counts bribes? Do they?
What matters is what state of USA provided to state of pakistan
And that is an OPEN BOOK

Those funds were given by the US State to the Pakistani State. How they were handled on the books by Pakistan is their internal matter. USA has records of the taxpayer's money sent. By US law bribes cannot be given, and anyone approving such a deal would be in jail.
 
.
Why don't they try India, best time when modi is in power
 
.
If Tajikistan denies access, which it most likely will, then the US will probably use Pakistani airspace from the Gulf, unfortunately.

If India can use Pakistan airspace than why not US?
 
. .
Quite possible that a deal can be worked out as needed.

No thanks, Pakistan spilt enough of its own blood to try to please those ungrateful b4stards, here's a thought though why don't You give up Your New Delhi home instead.. I would imagine it would be an logistical nighmare, but since You are willing.. i guess it's their best bet.
 
.
There's a difference between civilian airplanes and fighter jets.
US fighter jets are stealth.... Pakistan can't see them.
Afghanistan shares borders with Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Pakistan, Iran and small portion of China. Kirghizstan and Kazakhstan won't work for them since US would require air space from one of neighboring countries. Less Iran and Turkmenistan all are part of SCO lead by Russia and China. Situation seems tough for US.
US have a very obvious choice and that is to stay put in Afghanistan and BTW, to whom in Afghanistan US want to bomb by airforce?
Common sense says, It's illogical of US to ask for airbase in neighboring countries of Afghanistan to keep land locked Afghanis under check.
US is in Afghanistan to keep a check on Pakistan.... 911 was a drama, airplane collusion can't bring down buildings like WTC.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom