What's new

Pakistan and its expensive LNG procurement

blueazure

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 29, 2015
Messages
1,739
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
During the entire pandemic period Pakistan has maintained some economic activities and now it is making good recovery as the global economy is taking a liftoff. This unexpected global recovery is creating nightmares for the energy sources and is disrupting its entire supply chain, including the downstream.

As a result of the revival, shortages and price hikes are becoming rampant, not only for the food, raw materials, parts, and the merchandise, but also for the energy supplies, the lifeline for the everyday life and all kinds of economic activities! Transportation, power generation, heating, cooking, agriculture (fertilizers), all sectors need steady supply of oil & gas at reasonable prices. Higher prices not only inhibit job creation and value addition, but they also add inflation and bring more misery to every segment of the society, from the poor to the middle class.

There is no doubt that Pakistan desperately needs strategic energy policy for its national security like every other nation has developed. The policy should include substantial increase of the energy (oil &gas) storage capacity for its ever-increasing demand. As a matter of fact, Pakistan started importing LNG on a regular basis just recently as a cheaper and cleaner energy source for its power generation, industrial needs and for everyday cooking and heating source for its fast growing middleclass. As a result, its LNG volume is experiencing steady growth and manifold increase since its first import in 2015. This clearly shows that Pakistan is becoming one of the major consumers of LNG in South Asia.

In the pursuit of supporting its LNG demand for the industry, power generation and for consumers cooking and heating needs, in July Pakistan revived its old project with Russia that was initiated in 2015 but never finalized due to the USA sanctions on Russia and its major companies, including ROSTEC, the developer of the project. Even though the sanctions environment has not changed but due to the recent changes in the geopolitical landscape, Pakistan has signed the deal with Russia to build 1,122 Km pipeline for the LNG supply. According to the published reports, the pipeline will cost about $2.5 billion and is projected its completion by 2023. Pakistan will have 74% project’s ownership while Russia will have the remaining 26% of the ownership. According to some industry experts, it is a very ambitious timeline, besides its logistical and political challenges, funding of the project has not been secured!

In the interim, the supply of the LNG is getting volatile, and the prices are skyrocketing. Compared to the past, currently the entire Middle Eastern energy producing region is in a hotspot with higher volatility. In spite of the LNG supply sensitivity, no one in the PTI government is working to chart out strategy for its national “Energy Policy” for securing longer term supply agreement/s, supply diversification, storage increase, and secure distribution channels for the “National Security.” Because of the inexperienced staff (at PSO and PLL, the procurement agencies) in the modern-day trading and lack of negotiation skills in the energy sector, Pakistan is paying an exorbitant price by following Brent crude marker. Following of this pricing model is creating unnecessary depletion of the hard-earned foreign exchange, namely the USA dollars, and is adding further deficit to the trade balance.

During the last couple of months, Pakistan bought LNG cargoes at prices that were not only the highest in the history of Pakistan since LNG purchasing was undertaken but to some industry observers, the second highest price ever paid in the LNG history! In August, PSO bought a cargo of 140,000 cubic meters of LNG at a price of ~$20.06 per unit, almost about 29% of Brent.

According to some reports, due to poor planning and lack of experience in forecasting, the country has to purchase even more expensive LNG after cancelling just a few weeks ago cheaper spot offers ranging between $13-$16 MMBtu. As a matter of records, offer of $13.79-$13.99 from Pakistan’s main LNG supplier, Qatar, were also rejected with the hope that the prices will go down further. As a result, one of the procurement agencies (PLL) had no choice but to purchase four (4) spot LNG cargoes at $15.4 MMBtu price for September. The concerned authorities tried to justify expensive cargoes by saying “no one without a crystal ball can perfectly time or beat an international

commodity market”, which is NOT true. If crystal ball is needed to predict the prices, then highly paid managers are not needed, a high school graduate can do the job! In the USA and the EU, private sector, like the petrochemical, power generation and the aviation industries, all heavily depend their survival on the oil and gas commodities and also operate in the same highly volatile global market. To name a few, Dow chemical, DuPont, BASF, LG Chem, Samsung, ExxonMobil, Lyondell Basell, Boeing, Airbus, United Airlines, Delta Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Ryanair, Wizz Air, Blue Air, etc. But with good planning, having LNG-industry experienced staff, using modern analytics for supply, demand, and pricing modeling for forecasting and deliveries of the LNG and other raw materials at the precise timings, they procure the commodities at very competitive prices.

People who try to justify paying higher prices, don’t survive a day longer. In the business world, it is called strategic thinking, forecasting, hedging and execution! If the private companies will be using PSO and PLL’s justifications for purchasing expensive LNG and other raw materials for their operations, those companies will go out of business in no time! This writer is a veteran of the energy industry and has negotiated & mastered dynamics of the supply agreements by being on both sides of the table (procuring/selling) for over two decades while working for the Fortune 100 companies.

As of 2021, three largest exporters of the LNG in the world are Australia with 87.6 MMT per year, followed by Qatar with 77.4 MMT per year and the USA, the new entry in the energy export market since year 2016, with 71.6 MMT per year volume. Industry co-leader, Qatar is already ahead with the expansion project to increase its capacity much higher. Similarly, in the USA more export terminals are reaching their completions, thus much higher export volume will be possible for Asia and Europe.


GCC+ Iran Natural Gas Statistics (2020)

======================================
Country Reserves Production
(BCF) (BCF)
======================================
Qatar 871,100 16.53
Saudi Arabia 212,600 10.82
UAE 209,700 5.35
Kuwait 59,900 1.44
Oman 23,500 3.56
Bahrain 2,300 1.59
Iran 1,133,600 24.20
======================================
Source: BP Statistical Review 2021



Currently, Qatar has the world’s lowest production costs mainly due to abundance of easy-to-extract gas, most of which is located in the North Field that is shared with Iran.

Qatari Energy Minister (Saad Al-Kaabi), in a recent interview reiterated LNG capacity expansions whereby in its first phase in 2025, its capacity is targeted to increase to 110 million metric tons (MMT) per year, followed by 2027 expansion that will make its total yearly capacity to 126 MMT. These expansions will cost about $30 billion, making Qatar the undisputed leader and the lowest cost producer of the LNG industry. According to Wood Mackenzie, a premier management consulting firm, Qatar’s LNG production cost is just above its long-term breakeven price of $4/million Btu, thus at the bottom of the global LNG cost curve. This means that Qatar can cut its prices significantly and still make good money compared to some of the other industry players. As a matter of fact, in the recent past, Qatar offered 22% lower prices to secure its new clients.

Thus, it is a great opportunity to sign a longer-term agreement with Qatar using many indices to adjust the prices automatically like most of the contracts are signed by the experienced traders and users in the world, particularly for the commodities. As a matter of fact, only recently President Putin in a televised address underlined the wintertime misery that Europe is going through is because of not having longer term supply agreements. As a result of this, not only Europe is paying extremely high prices but also experiencing a limited supply of natural gas for heating and power generation during the unseasonably cold and longer winters.

Most commonly used indices in the energy industry for the longer-term supply agreements are:

  • Brent oil
  • WTI
  • Henri Hub
  • NBP
  • Nymex
  • TTF
Since Pakistan is also committed to complying with the Paris Agreement and is determined to transition its power needs through the same pathway as the others, securing LNG supply at competitive prices has become now more of a paramount importance. Thus, right now, it is in the vital interest of Pakistan that its policy makers and the procurement agencies must devise their strategy for securing longer term supply agreements with diversification in mind and using formula driven price matrix to guarantee never to pay again exorbitant prices in the future. Recently, two of the major Houston (Texas) based leaders in the LNG sector, namely Cheniere (producer & exporter) and Glencore (trader), have announced a binding long-term agreement indexed to Henry Hub price plus a fixed liquification fee for thirteen (13) years period, starting from 2023. Thus, this longer-term supply agreement between these two players further reinforces the importance for Pakistan to have its own longer-term supply agreement for its critical LNG volume ASAP. This strategy will not only support Pakistan’s steadily LNG volume growth for its power, industry and consumers cooking and heating needs but will also help the cost savings for improving and expanding the current inadequate LNG storage and distribution infrastructure. The investments made in the infrastructure will be readily available to use when ready to migrate to non-fossil fuels, like hydrogen, ammonia, etc. with no or a very little modification cost! Therefore, it is in Pakistan’s national security and vital interest to use its brotherly relations with Qatar’s rulers to chart out longer term LNG formula-based supply agreement with upfront discounted prices in reflection with the planned new capacity increase. This will be not only a win-win situation for both brotherly countries, Qatar & Pakistan, but it will also help Qatar to secure certain volume of its added capacity regardless of the volatility of the market and future overcapacity as numerous brownfield and greenfield LNG plants are coming on the horizon.

(The views expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the newspaper)

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

 
.
Yaar kaisay phudu loag hain Pakistani. LNG prices have almost tripled since May this year and people are wondering why GOP is procuring expensive LNG. Simple si chese samjh nae aati kay Pakistan now Imports 70% of its gas from overseas. There is no bloody rocket science to it.
 
. .
Yaar kaisay phudu loag hain Pakistani. LNG prices have almost tripled since May this year and people are wondering why GOP is procuring expensive LNG. Simple si chese samjh nae aati kay Pakistan now Imports 70% of its gas from overseas. There is no bloody rocket science to it.


article parh lo /

it says something about LT agreement . tsk tsk
 
.
article parh lo /

it says something about LT agreement . tsk tsk

Article is missing several factor. One being several cargos being cancelled which were contracted but not delivered. Contracted companies paid penalties rather than delivering cargos. Second govt has secured more cargos this year 12 compared to 8 last year for same period. 3rd Govt will be running Furnace oil plants where 17Rs/unit electricity can be produced compared to 35Rs if LNG plants are run with current market price of LNG. As i said LNG is expensive and govt cant procure 100% from long term contracts due to market fluctuation. 30% are still procures via spot buying which obviously come with its own risk. Shortage this year will be less than last year. I have done my research. If you are refering Oil marked with percentage of brent then you should know that is practice for all LNG contracts. No one will give you a fixed price for a long term contract without accounting for market fluctuation. Same percentage of brent also helps when prices are below agreed in contract.
 
.
@farok84 Sir, any thoughts on how we can procure LNG at min cost, in the long run?

Hi,

We have actually signed a long term contract with Qatar in Feb, 2021. It is, to date, the lowest contracted price (10.2% of 3 month averaged Brent) for any Lng procurement around the world and is a very fine and balanced contract. As per the contract, we should be importing 2 cargoes per month from January 2022 and by January 2024, we should be importing 4 cargoes/month. We should also be importing some cargoes (I'm guessing 2 per month) at same price from Qatar for November and December 2021, this was also part of the new contract. We should be able to get exact cargoes number next week when Ogra issues RLNG prices.

Our firm demand throughout the year is 800mmcfd or 8 cargoes/month, which we have secured through our older Qatar (5 cargo/ month), Eni (1 cargo/ month) and Gunvor (1 cargo/month) term contracts. In winters this demand exceeds 1200mmcfd for which, we will have to rely on spot markets, until we have an affordable solution for storage.

Two proposal are in works for this, first is for Lng storage (Above Ground Storage Tanks) and second for Underground Gas Storage in depleted reservoirs of Sindh. Both of these require heavy investments (and for UGS, a base or cushion gas, an extra cost), unfortunately, the money (Gas Infrastructure Development Cess or GIDC) that was collected on this account (that should have been set aside), has been utilized by PTI government (for budget balancing or some other procurements). Now, until we can find an investor and a way to spread the tariff (to be incurred on end consumer), I don't see any of these options materializing.

Now for our current problems (for November), are due to Eni and Gunvor defaults, for which we can't hold incumbent government accountable. Suppliers are seeing 3-4 times more profit in Spot markets and are even diverting term cargoes to make exorbitant profits (can't blame them, honoring one words, isn't something what most commodity traders are known for). Which brings us to the question of how our term contracts were drafted in first place, to heavily support suppliers? Was it our incompetence or inexperience? If they default, they only have to pay 30% fine, on the total cost of the cargo in question. So they gleefully default, pay the fine, and make twice the profit and we are left to lick our wounds. We should cancel Eni contract and should procure replacement volumes from Qatar, diversification of suppliers is not working for us. This is the 3rd time within this year when Eni has defaulted and has offered to pay full fine, but the same contract won't let us cancel it, without a fine of $300million.

These procurement problems will remain till 2024, afterwards, once our new Qatar contract kicks in fully, things will ease out. PTI has envisaged an increase in year round base RLNG demand from 800-1000mmcfd by 2024 and have secured 9000mmcfd from Qatar (500 from PMLN 2016 and 400mmcfd from PTI 2021 contracts) and 100mmcfd from PMLN's Eni contract. So, for winter 2022 and 2023 demands in power sector we will have to rely on alternate fuels (FO/ Diesel).

To mitigate 2022 and 2023 issues, we can increase our intake from Qatar contracts [known as Annual Upward Quantity usually 10% of Annual Contracted Quantity or for 2022, extra 6 (from 2016) & 2 (from 2021) cargoes, and for 2023, 6 and 3 cargoes) and spreading our schedule (Annual Procurement Plan) unevenly so we can have more cargoes in winter months than summers. I believe PTI has arranged extra cargoes through same mechanism for Nov, Dec 2021 and Jan, Feb 2022. Eni and Gunvor stabbed us in back, and no one can plan for such betrayals.

I also don't see Pakistan getting into a short term (2 years) contract in meanwhile. China (Private Companies) have recently entered 2 short term (2 years) contracts priced at premiums of $1-2/mmbtu over JKM (Japan Korea Marker) and Dutch TTF (Title Transfer Facility). They have set the precedence and we can't afford such prices.

Apart from procurement and storage issues, our regasification and pipeline capacity issues, are other limiting factors. We don't have any extra pipeline capacity and PTI has wasted 3 years in negotiating a Share Holders Agreement (SHA) on Pakistan Stream Gas Pipeline (PSGP) with Russians to 74-26% break-up till July 2021, to only ask Russia in October 2021 for arranging finances for Pakistan's share (74%), effectively making it again a 100% Russian investment (back to 2015) while insisting on no sovereign guarantees, who will want to invest in such non serious prevailing conditions and ridiculous environment? The reason for this is also GIDC misappropriation.

For our regasification limits, some head way was seen, in terms of Tabeer and Energas import terminals, but they have now also shown their displeasure publicly and have written directly to PM, lamenting greedy SSGC and SNGPL for creating roadblocks on pipeline capacity (which was necessary for PSGP construction, guaranteed 600mmcfd divided among both these would have helped in convincing Russians on that 74% finances) and PD for creating unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles, and have informed of their intentions to roll back their investment plans. The issues haunting our Oil/ Gas procurements rise from inexperience (industry naivety) of our Minister-in-Training and the rolling gate for experienced SAPM (minus Tabish Gohar, he is the reason for messing up of PSGP and new terminals).

But all is not doomed and gloomed, head way should be seen in PSGP next week (Russian's are due in Islamabad Nov 8th) and both Tabeer (partner Mitsubishi) and Energas (now partner Qatar) will find some relief and backing from government. These will solve our pipeline and regasification capacity issues. Also, it is my opinion that GOP is looking to limit future government Lng procurement and we should see some sort of head way on TAP(I) after PSGP is finalized. But that solution will also come in play beyond 2025-26, interim solutions are Spot markets when affordable, FO/ Diesel when not and increase in quantities from Qatar.
 
Last edited:
. .
Hi,

We have actually signed a long term contract with Qatar in Feb, 2021. It is, to date, the lowest contracted price (10.2% of 3 month averaged Brent) for any Lng procurement around the world and is a very fine and balanced contract. As per the contract, we should be importing 2 cargoes per month from January 2022 and by January 2024, we should be importing 4 cargoes/month. We should also be importing some cargoes (I'm guessing 2 per month) at same price from Qatar for November and December 2021, this was also part of the new contract. We should be able to get exact cargoes number next week when Ogra issues RLNG prices.

Our firm demand throughout the year is 800mmcfd or 8 cargoes/month, which we have secured through our older Qatar (5 cargo/ month), Eni (1 cargo/ month) and Gunvor (1 cargo/month) term contracts. In winters this demand exceeds 1200mmcfd for which, we will have to rely on spot markets, until we have an affordable solution for storage.

Two proposal are in works for this, first is for Lng storage (Above Ground Storage Tanks) and second for Underground Gas Storage in depleted reservoirs of Sindh. Both of these require heavy investments (and for UGS, a base or cushion gas, an extra cost), unfortunately, the money (Gas Infrastructure Development Cess or GIDC) that was collected on this account (that should have been set aside), has been utilized by PTI government (for budget balancing or some other procurements). Now, until we can find an investor and a way to spread the tariff (to be incurred on end consumer), I don't see any of these options materializing.

Now for our current problems (for November), are due to Eni and Gunvor defaults, for which we can't hold incumbent government accountable. Suppliers are seeing 3-4 times more profit in Spot markets and are even diverting term cargoes to make exorbitant profits (can't blame them, honoring one words, isn't something what most commodity traders are known for). Which brings us to the question of how our term contracts were drafted in first place, to heavily support suppliers? Was it our incompetence or inexperience? If they default, they only have to pay 30% fine, on the total cost of the cargo in question. So they gleefully default, pay the fine, and make twice the profit and we are left to lick our wounds. We should cancel Eni contract and should procure replacement volumes from Qatar, diversification of suppliers is not working for us. This is the 3rd time within this year when Eni has defaulted and has offered to pay full fine, but the same contract won't let us cancel it, without a fine of $300million.

These procurement problems will remain till 2024, afterwards, once our new Qatar contract kicks in fully, things will ease out. PTI has envisaged an increase in year round base RLNG demand from 800-1000mmcfd by 2024 and have secured 9000mmcfd from Qatar (500 from PMLN 2016 and 400mmcfd from PTI 2021 contracts) and 100mmcfd from PMLN's Eni contract. So, for winter 2022 and 2023 demands in power sector we will have to rely on alternate fuels (FO/ Diesel).

To mitigate 2022 and 2023 issues, we can increase our intake from Qatar contracts [known as Annual Upward Quantity usually 10% of Annual Contracted Quantity or for 2022, extra 6 (from 2016) & 2 (from 2021) cargoes, and for 2023, 6 and 3 cargoes) and spreading our schedule (Annual Procurement Plan) unevenly so we can have more cargoes in winter months than summers. I believe PTI has arranged extra cargoes through same mechanism for Nov, Dec 2021 and Jan, Feb 2022. Eni and Gunvor stabbed us in back, and no one can plan for such betrayals.

I also don't see Pakistan getting into a short term (2 years) contract in meanwhile. China (Private Companies) have recently entered 2 short term (2 years) contracts priced at premiums of $1-2/mmbtu over JKM (Japan Korea Marker) and Dutch TTF (Title Transfer Facility). They have set the precedence and we can't afford such prices.

Apart from procurement and storage issues, our regasification and pipeline capacity issues, are other limiting factors. We don't have any extra pipeline capacity and PTI has wasted 3 years in negotiating a Share Holders Agreement (SHA) on Pakistan Stream Gas Pipeline (PSGP) with Russians to 74-26% break-up till July 2021, to only ask Russia in October 2021 for arranging finances for Pakistan's share (74%), effectively making it again a 100% Russian investment (back to 2015) while insisting on no sovereign guarantees, who will want to invest in such non serious prevailing conditions and ridiculous environment? The reason for this is also GIDC misappropriation.

For our regasification limits, some head way was seen, in terms of Tabeer and Energas import terminals, but they have now also shown their displeasure publicly and have written directly to PM, lamenting greedy SSGC and SNGPL for creating roadblocks on pipeline capacity (which was necessary for PSGP construction, guaranteed 600mmcfd divided among both these would have helped in convincing Russians on that 74% finances) and PD for creating unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles, and have informed of their intentions to roll back their investment plans. The issues haunting our Oil/ Gas procurements rise from inexperience (industry naivety) of our Minister-in-Training and the rolling gate for experienced SAPM (minus Tabish Gohar, he is the reason for messing up of PSGP and new terminals).

But all is not doomed and gloomed, head way should be seen in PSGP next week (Russian's are due in Islamabad Nov 8th) and both Tabeer (partner Mitsubishi) and Energas (now partner Qatar) will find some relief and backing from government. These will solve our pipeline and regasification capacity issues. Also, it is my opinion that GOP is looking to limit future government Lng procurement and we should see some sort of head way on TAP(I) after PSGP is finalized. But that solution will also come in play beyond 2025-26, interim solutions are Spot markets when affordable, FO/ Diesel when not and increase in quantities from Qatar.

Sir,

This is why I wanted your professional opinion. Thank You for takeing time out and replying in detail.

Apologies for the silly question, I am about to ask. "Can we buy FO/Diesel at preferential rate from GCC." Is that a remote possibility?

Kind Regards
 
.
At least now all those critics whose assumed that Khaqan Abbasi foolishly tied GOP to expensive long term contract, would realise why countries and companies enter into long term supply contracts. And that the base load fuel of most power plants is covered by term contract primarily to ensure security of supply; even though often it means paying more than the spot price.
 
.
At least now all those critics whose assumed that Khaqan Abbasi foolishly tied GOP to expensive long term contract, would realise why countries and companies enter into long term supply contracts. And that the base load fuel of most power plants is covered by term contract primarily to ensure security of supply; even though often it means paying more than the spot price.
If people actually understood such complex issues, we wouldn't have idiots in power, or a nation in crisis.
 
. .
Sir,

This is why I wanted your professional opinion. Thank You for takeing time out and replying in detail.

Apologies for the silly question, I am about to ask. "Can we buy FO/Diesel at preferential rate from GCC." Is that a remote possibility?

Kind Regards

Brother, Please don't call me sir, it makes me feel old :-) and frankly these titles are more suitable for people like niaz sb, who are way more experienced than myself in the industry.

For the question, I think it will be hard for Gulf countries to give direct discounted price for spot purchases in open tenders. There is a tender issued by PSO for procurement of HSFO, delivery for mid Jan 2022. They can't quote one price to us and another, to some other customer within same delivery window.

The favor will come, but not as discounted price. What they have been offering is a credit line at low interest rates that can be utilized for buying petroleum products. This credit line/ soft loans have been extended to us numerous times by KSA, UAE and Qatar through different state owned banks of respective countries.
 
. .
At least now all those critics whose assumed that Khaqan Abbasi foolishly tied GOP to expensive long term contract, would realise why countries and companies enter into long term supply contracts. And that the base load fuel of most power plants is covered by term contract primarily to ensure security of supply; even though often it means paying more than the spot price.
If people actually understood such complex issues, we wouldn't have idiots in power, or a nation in crisis.
Long-term contract of LNG was never the problem but the price. PTI govt has done the lowest price LNG contract something that Shahid Khaqan Abbasi lovers could never recognize.
 
.
If people actually understood such complex issues, we wouldn't have idiots in power, or a nation in crisis.

Sorry to say that sir you are also a part of the same group, as for the 'idiots' the previous ones were bigger as compared to the current ones.

1) As far as your assessment goes regarding long term contracts. The criticism is around the price secured for long term contracts not against long term contract.

PTI secured the cheapest Long term contract in the world vs khakan securing the most expensive in the region. ( I am taking into account the time frame of our contracts in comparison keeping in view the contracts signed by other countries in roughly the same time frame) .

2) The TAKE OR PAY model followed in Terminal contracts with sovereign gurantees. As against the recent push by pti to facilitate deregulation and private sector investment ( the recent 2 led by private sector).
There is no liability or sovereign guarantees burden on state Completely opposite of plmn model.

These 2 points cover the most important aspects of LNG. Now Sir with all due respect can you please contradict with what I pointed out?

Now coming on to the recent debacle.

Pakistan spot procurement is cheaper than other countries please correct me if I am wrong. Do you know India procument in spot market is around $26 for Nov.
You always compare procrument by other countries in the same time frame.
@farok84 bro can you please give an idea of what is the procurement cost for spot cargoes by other countries as compared to Pakistan for the recent months?

Now the last point the default on 2 long term cargoes. Who signed just 30% penalty in case if they do not supply? Had your contract been more rigorous like Japan, these suppliers would not have defaulted.

The short comings to me of PTI government as the ones before it is not establishing on ground storage.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom