truthfollower
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2019
- Messages
- 1,841
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
its a good thing or bad thing?It was never backed by verification provisions, for example.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
its a good thing or bad thing?It was never backed by verification provisions, for example.
Letting others visit your nuclear sites is not a good thing obviously. That's why both countries don't let that happen.its a good thing or bad thing?
Leave apart about peace offers, just leave "bleed India by 1000 cuts" everything will improve.No amount of peace offered to the Nazis will appease them.
Government has betrayed the trust of the people.
By improvement you mean?Leave apart about peace offers, just leave "bleed India by 1000 cuts" everything will improve.
Unfortunately we had once a bastard sitting at helm of affairs and he stopped that otherwise things would have been different.Leave apart about peace offers, just leave "bleed India by 1000 cuts" everything will improve.
I don't trust the extremist fundamentalist Hindu nation of India. They will use Pakistan's list to purposely attack those facilities. They are butchering our children in schools through their terror proxies!
Worst decision ever!
Relationship with India and inturn Economy of both countries...By improvement you mean?
Agreed, things would have turned to worse...Unfortunately we had once a bastard sitting at helm of affairs and he stopped that otherwise things would have been different.
Ironically they made it easy for each other to attack these facilities in case of War. LmaoWith the turn of the year, Pakistan and India have shared the lists of their nuclear installations and strategic facilities as part of an agreement that limits the two adversaries from attacking each other’s atomic facilities during a war.
When the non-attack agreement was originally negotiated, both countries’ nuclear weapons enterprises were relatively small and secretive, and fears of a surprise attack on nuclear facilities had been rampant for several years.
The agreement in theory helped allay concerns that nuclear facilities could be attacked purposefully, either by surprise or during a conflict, thus mitigating the potential humanitarian or environmental consequences that might result.
Over time, this exercise has proven to be merely symbolic, and its potential as a building block for enhanced confidence has remained limited.
It was never backed by verification provisions, for example.
During the period prior to 1998, in which neither state had openly declared its nuclear weapon status, it was widely assumed that both sides omitted nuclear-weapons-related facilities from their respective declaration.
It is almost certainly the case today that neither side declares sites associated with nuclear weapons storage and operations, and perhaps other facilities as well.
Ironically they made it easy for each other to attack these facilities in case of War. Lmao
We cannot offer Indian economy anything.Relationship with India and inturn Economy of both countries...
We are spending our precious resource against each other.
Honestly our both countries could do better together.
Your gateway to central Asia boss you can do miraclesWe cannot offer Indian economy anything.
Why did you decline the offer then for CPEC extension into India?Your gateway to central Asia boss you can do miracles
You misunderstood my post.Agreed, things would have turned to worse...
PMIK is patriotic and man of pride, but your past karma is biting back... It will take atleast one decade to Pak back on track of recovery. Unfortunately you don't have Cong in power on Indian side who would have given a Lee way to Pak leadership. Current regime is upping the ante for ever action or mis- action at boarder front and every other front.. Pak is giving back but India has more resources in every aspect and can absorb Pak's hit.