Jihad
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2008
- Messages
- 2,079
- Reaction score
- 0
Well, they somehow knew even before the investigation started that it was the ISI, and then when they finished most it, and came up with a dossier than they shared with the rest of the world, it concluded that there was no evidence of Pakistani institutional involvement, but they still continued to insist the ISI was involved.
It just seemed like they were hell bent on ranting about the 'ISI was involved' regardless of what the evidence suggested.
Indeed, I think the Indians came to their senses a little when even the Americans and British concluded that the ISI nor the Pakistani government had anything to do with these attacks.
Yet it is funny to see Indian politicians claim otherwise afterwards, they continue to do so, they refuse to believe even their sources (the "rest of the world") who they conduct and cry to so often to condemn Pakistan or isolate Pakistan in any way possible.