What's new

Pakistan accuses US State Department of lying.

Two days of headlines in Pakistan's English-language media. A media very strongly influenced by the Pakistani gov't when it comes to reporting Pakistani government's stance on external matters.
With you we don't even have to try, you're literally a Yahudi Sazish.
If you don't know Dawn is very anti army and Express Tribune is owned by New York Times.
 
.
Yes, it looked like they weren't expecting this kind of rebuttal from Pakistan, so she just blabbed away with the statement issued before.

Testing waters before real engagement... thos was no mistake

Another reason would be that they were trying to assess the civil military relations of Pakistan because civil and military good relations of Pakistan are the biggest nightmare of anti-Pakistan actors. To make a successful conclusion one needs to assess the press conference of state department if the answer was well prepared that means they were not surprised but if their answer is not well prepared that means it came as a shock to them. So see the video to make this conclusion.

This video below can help make that assessment

 
.
Two days of headlines in Pakistan's English-language media. A media very strongly influenced by the Pakistani gov't when it comes to reporting Pakistani government's stance on external matters.

I don't do the twitter stuff, I was going off the Reuters website.

Note that the Reuters article lists its authors. Google their names. One of them isn't just a reporter. Do you see what his other job is?


Blaming the media is not the solution. Trump administration officials are pathological liars and as such lack credibility.

Presupposing the culprit? Still, that's not really the issue. Look at the past history of digressing statements between Pakistan's FM and the U.S. State Dept. You'll find other instances of Pakistani officials making claims about conversations in contradiction to accounts of U.S. officials. Almost always the U.S. lets it go without saying anything. IMO this is because the U.S. "understands" that foreign officials may sometimes need to fib to their people about their communications with the U.S. This time the digression assumed unusual prominence in Pakistan's media and the State Dept. stuck to its guns rather than let it pass or answer follow-up inquiries with, "No comment".


Delusional.

Pakistan didn't have a Foreign Minister under the previous government for the last five years. Hence, no one called out Washington's "mistruths". This is new territory for State Department so it is understandable that they would stumble on their first day.


Yes, it looked like they weren't expecting this kind of rebuttal from Pakistan, so she just blabbed away with the statement issued before.


Heather Nauert's body language indicated she was uncomfortable which is why she refused to reiterate the false statements in the press release. This isn't something we haven't seen before from this administration. Sarah Huckabee and Kellyanne Conway are both liars of international repute.
 
Last edited:
.
Another reason would be that they were trying to assess the civil military relations of Pakistan because civil and military good relations of Pakistan are the biggest nightmare of anti-Pakistan actors. To make a successful conclusion one needs to assess the press conference of state department if the answer was well prepared that means they were not surprised but if their answer is not well prepared that means it came as a shock to them. So see the video to make this conclusion.

This video below can help make that assessment

From the video you can judge one thing they had a discussion about this before hand and she knew this was going to come up in the press briefing. But the thing to note here is she read the statement they issued and stopped just short of the part where US claimed about terrorism talk.
So she didn't want to repeat it again and reinforce their point of view and she was in hurry to get to the next question and avoid making another controversy.
Considering the Salala Check post attack, they took months to issue an apology on that, which was more of an act of war.
So when you keep that in mind, her stopping short of reading that part again is kind of a backtracking from US from their original statement and if anyone was expecting a full on apology and correction in their statement that was very naive of them.

In my opinion they have been doing this before and issuing these standard statements after every engagement with Pakistani officials as you can check their past Statements. They weren't expecting such a strong public rejection of their statement, so they have an idea now that it's not like business as usual.
 
.
From the video you can judge one thing they had a discussion about this before hand and she knew this was going to come up in the press briefing. But the thing to note here is she read the statement they issued and stopped just short of the part where US claimed about terrorism talk.
So she didn't want to repeat it again and reinforce their point of view and she was in hurry to get to the next question and avoid making another controversy.
Considering the Salala Check post attack, they took months to issue an apology on that, which was more of an act of war.
So when you keep that in mind, her stopping short of reading that part again is kind of a backtracking from US from their original statement and if anyone was expecting a full on apology and correction in their statement that was very naive of them.

In my opinion they have been doing this before and issuing these standard statements after every engagement with Pakistani officials as you can check their past Statements. They weren't expecting such a strong public rejection of their statement, so they have an idea now that it's not like business as usual.

Yes you are correct she had a discussion but the thing you need to look for is was that discussion before or after Pakistani foreign office statement. There is a little element of shock in here as well. It show they were not prepared for this response and were going to play their game like the old habit. This is where your first statement gets the weight.
 
.
I agree, and it reflects poorly on the State Department that it issued a release like this (that at worst is incorrect and at best did not have the Pakistani MoFA approval) given that IK could have refused to take Pompeo’s call citing protocol, prior commitments etc. These calls are arranged in advance - IK chose to accept the call. The State Department statement might be taken as a stab in the back if not retracted.
Agreed
 
.
Yes you are correct she had a discussion but the thing you need to look for is was that discussion before or after Pakistani foreign office statement. There is a little element of shock in here as well. It show they were not prepared for this response and were going to play their game like the old habit. This is where your first statement gets the weight.
Totally agree. The shock was pretty visible and if they had any truth in their claim by now US would have released several statements and that Orange buffoon would have tweeted something.
 
.
I think that few coming days from 1st September to 10th September are really interested as Foreign Ministers of Iran, Japan and China are coming to Pak.
 
. . .
If IK didnt take the call, dont you think the US state wont make a new drama? They are a part of a drama crew under Trump!
Call should had been directed to Shah Mahmood
 
.
ISLAMABAD: US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s visit to Islamabad is likely to go ahead despite the controversy that erupted over his telephonic conversation with Prime Minister Imran Khan.

“We are looking forward to Secretary Pompeo’s visit to engage with him for peace and stability and look at areas where we can cooperate,” Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi said at a press conference at the Foreign Office on Friday.

Secretary Pompeo is expected to visit Islamabad on Sept 5.

Mr Pompeo had earlier phoned Mr Khan to greet him on the assumption of office. The controversy started with the readout of the conversation issued by the State Department, which stated: “Secretary Pompeo raised the importance of Pakistan taking decisive action against all terrorists operating in Pakistan and its vital role in promoting the Afghan peace process.”

Foreign Minister Qureshi says US account of phone conversation is ‘contrary to reality’; Washington stands by its readout

The FO rejected the US assertion, saying it was “factually incorrect” and that nothing of that sort had been mentioned during the conversation. The State Department, however, disregarded Pakistani contention and stood by its initial readout of the phone call.

Mr Qureshi, who had ordered his ministry to issue a rebuttal over the State Department claim, weighed in on the issue and said the American statement was “contrary to the reality”.

He, however, emphasised that Pakistan’s relationship with the US was important and the PTI government would like to have a constructive engagement with Washington by building on the convergences in the relationship.

The foreign minister also mentioned the importance of cooperating with the US for peace in Afghanistan for improving the complexion of Pakistan-US ties. “We will have to understand their expectations and they would have to look at our requirements. It is not a one-way relationship,” he maintained.

Later, talking to the outgoing US ambassador David Hale, who paid a farewell call on him, Mr Qureshi said his interactions with the US leadership would be based on honesty and sincerity so as to develop a sustained partnership in the interest of both countries.

Meanwhile, State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert stressed that the US still saw Pakistan as “an important partner” and “hope(s) to forge a good, productive working relationship with the new civilian government” in Islamabad.

“My understanding is that the beginning of the call or the call itself was a good call and a good discussion toward our working with the new government and the new administration,” she said.

However, she said, “We stand by our readout.”

Wang due on Sept 8

Mr Qureshi said his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi would be visiting Islamabad on Sept 8.

The foreign minister underscored the importance of Pakistan-China relations saying that China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) was “an important development” and the PTI government would seek to “benefit to the fullest” from it.

He described the Pak-China relations as exemplary. “The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation also brings numerous opportunities, and how Pakistan can benefit has to be analysed,” he said.

Also, Iranian foreign minister Javad Zarif is expected to visit Pakistan by the month end. Similarly, the Japanese minister of state for foreign affairs expressed his interest in visiting Islamabad for engaging with the new government.

Responding to a question about dialogue with India, Mr Qureshi said there was no other option. “Irrespective of whether or not we make progress in ties, we will have to talk,” he said.

He recalled that it was prime minister’s desire to improve ties with India and Mr Khan had mentioned the same during his victory speech after the general election.

He also said Indian external affairs minister Sushma Swaraj had sent a greeting message for him on becoming the foreign minister.

Mr Qureshi had last week kicked up a minor controversy when his statement was assumed to have suggested that India had offered to open dialogue with Pakistan. The FO had to clarify Mr Qureshi’s comments after India denied the statement.

PM visits FO

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Imran Khan on Friday paid his first visit to the Foreign Office where he was briefed on some more important matters related to external affairs. He stayed there for nearly an hour and a half.

It is said that Mr Khan “gave guidelines” on foreign policy. The PTI leadership had earlier stated that Pakistan’s interests would be central to foreign policy operations.

Anwar Iqbal also contributed to this report from Washington.

Published in Dawn, August 25th, 2018
 
.
these PTI chaps r doing completely wrong....They must have cancelled the fatty's tour.
 
. . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom