This is the most reasonable response I have got so far, and I think it worth serious consideration by all Indian members. I, for one, shall take the concluding sentence as a useful signpost and proceed from there.
Thank you for the point of view. Others have also articulated it, no one has tried to disentangle it from the seabed weeds and let it float freely.
No. R&W is not authorised to act within the country.
And as for your silly second point, that counts as a self-goal. That is precisely the difference, that is precisely what in your place I should have concealed very deep; such an incident makes India take action, apprehend the culprits, prosecute them and apologise. In Pakistan, where such incidents have happened often, there is bland denial. That is the difference. We observe the rule of law; where it is breached, it is seen as a breach, not as an exercise of sovereign will. We observe our treaties; you break them. We are civilised members of the comity of nations; you, it seems, are determined not to be.
That is indeed what I would apprehend, that I would be referred to a physiologist. It is interesting that this has nothing to do with age, and becomes more severe with age. Perhaps that sums up the story of your clinical readiness.
