‘Pak disqualified PM, Why no inquiry on Indians named in Panama papers?’

[Guynextdoor2]

even if it does not look good the main point of little bit enthusiasm is that a process has start to make powerful accountable.

even if it does not look good the main point of little bit enthusiasm is that a process has start to make powerful look accountable

 

[Spring Onion]

even if it does not look good the main point of little bit enthusiasm is that a process has start to make powerful look accountable

even that is better than no effort at all.

 

[KN-1]

PM disqualified, not even single clash or riot reported, everybody whether in favour or not accepted decision and moved on.. We are heading in right direction as far as Judiciary is concern..

As far as Panama, well we have to look in other 450 names as well.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Nawaz Sharif is not disqualified over Panama papers but article 62/63, but yeah whiners will whine over anything to protest against Modi.

There is no such clause in our constitution which specifically mention "Panama leak". Only 62 and 63 ammendments can deal with this issue hence applied. If your constitution is not capable to deal the corruption at this level, whoes responsibility is it to change/ammend the constitution so your judiciary can enforce and interpret it accordingly?

 

[ranjeet]

There is no such clause in our constitution which specifically mention "Panama leak". Only 62 and 63 ammendments can deal with this issue hence applied. If your constitution is not capable to deal the corruption at this level, whoes responsibility is it to change/ammend the constitution so your judiciary can enforce and interpret it accordingly?

ok