AZB-V is rocket boosted like H4.azb unpowered, kagem turbojet powered, h2 i think was rocket assisted but i dont remember now
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AZB-V is rocket boosted like H4.azb unpowered, kagem turbojet powered, h2 i think was rocket assisted but i dont remember now
yeah but azb v will have alot shorter of a range and wont be able to maneuver without losing energy that it cant regainAZB-V is rocket boosted like H4.
It’s quoted to be up to 220km and confirmed by a member way before the specs were released. But yes a lot more depend on launch altitude and speed and flight path compared jet powered light CM. But it’s the same in the case with H4.yeah but azb v will have alot shorter of a range and wont be able to maneuver without losing energy that it cant regain
REK series have powered versions. We already saw one variant with Mirage V, the I-REK i think. Booster would allow easily 400km+ Range.azb unpowered, kagem turbojet powered, h2 i think was rocket assisted but i dont remember now
Just rocket booster or powered somewhat like Raptor 3?REK series have powered versions. We already saw one variant with Mirage V, the I-REK i think. Booster would allow easily 400km+ Range.
Just rocket booster or powered somewhat like Raptor 3?
That's a great observation -- so this could be closer to a smaller, lower-cost ALCM. I think a 350-450 kg ALCM (albeit with a lighter payload of 100 kg) create another capability space in the PAF's SOW inventory, complementing the heavier and longer-ranged Ra'ad-II and Taimoor.Judging by the small intake duct that we can just see at the back,this is jet powered.
View attachment 960347
If it is actually based on the chinese GB6 glide bomb then it looks to be a somewhat simplified design in that it doesnt use folding pop out wings,but instead an externally mounted fixed one piece wing.
It may look pretty basic and simple,but it also looks like it could be produced in decent numbers fairly cheaply by making maximum use of cheap cots,and it could be used in both the air launched and ground launched roles.
This is pretty much AZB-V. So the range as advertised is 190-220km.View attachment 960555
REK-3 sorry not I-REK. I presume its just a rocket booster attached to the back of a REK, since no vents are visible.
If we can also have an air launched Fatah 1/2, that would be sweet.That's a great observation -- so this could be closer to a smaller, lower-cost ALCM. I think a 350-450 kg ALCM (albeit with a lighter payload of 100 kg) create another capability space in the PAF's SOW inventory, complementing the heavier and longer-ranged Ra'ad-II and Taimoor.
So, we have the AZB-series for striking at long ranges with heavy munitions at scale, and the KAGEM-series for loiter + precision-strike at scale. The PAF could use the KAGEM to validate targets (which may have moved, are hidden, etc) and then follow up with AZB/IREK strikes to ensure it's destroyed.
IIRC...the CM-400AKG can play that role.If we can also have an air launched Fatah 1/2, that would be sweet.
Affordability is the key. Specially, in extended conflict and I am assuming Fatah unit cost is lower.IIRC...the CM-400AKG can play that role.
IMO...it's doable...Israel did it with the Rampage (i.e., a 306 mm rocket).Affordability is the key. Specially, in extended conflict and I am assuming Fatah unit cost is lower.
That’s exactly what I had in mind.IMO...it's doable...Israel did it with the Rampage (i.e., a 306 mm rocket).
IMO the main constraint is compartmentalization -- i.e., a bureau under GIDS runs the Fatah-I/II, but the PAF prefers leaning on NASTP et.al? Hence, if the PAF wants an air-launched rocket, there's a risk they'll duplicate the work already in place at GIDS (e.g., by pursuing Roketsan's UAV-230, for example).That’s exactly what I had in mind.
True but there is also collaboration. Azb, Faaz, etc are air force centric programs.IMO the main constraint is compartmentalization -- i.e., a bureau under GIDS runs the Fatah-I/II, but the PAF prefers leaning on NASTP et.al? Hence, if the PAF wants an air-launched rocket, there's a risk they'll duplicate the work already in place at GIDS (e.g., by pursuing Roketsan's UAV-230, for example).