What's new

PAF to get land in Nasirabad for air base

The issue isn't "do more" or even relations with the US.

Rather, the issue is that we don't maintain relations based on national interest.

In reality, our relations are based on the interests of individuals or cadres ruling Pakistan, and as a result, no one respects us. The "do more" message isn't for Pakistan, but for specific Pakistanis to get the job done or else they lose their individualized benefits.

Even the US wouldn't insult Pakistan if it meant dealing with rulers who don't give a crap about their own personal interests. It's a different story for people with green cards, property, offshore accounts and businesses on the line.

Anyways, Pakistan should be working towards neutrality and non-alignment. We're a country of 200 million people split across three main regional crossroads. There's no reason for us to 'align' with anyone, be it USA or China.
Bhai Rekodiq case is the perfect example of this. $6billion phasay way hain.
 
.
Iranians on PDF are an extremely ignorant and arrogant bunch, they don't consider anyone their equal, even Islam hasn't fix their superiority complex, A weaker but humble Iran is always in Pakistan's interest, the stronger they get, the more you see Target killing on Sunni leaders in Karachi.
They are like Afghanis, you gotta spank them every now n than
 
.
More like land allocation for a future US airbase.....
if we did not have a need for an airbase in that particular area
how come a need suddenly arises?
its not like we have changed our geography suddenly
Missiles, Radars, fighter jets, ranges and war tactics all have evolved significantly. You will see Pakistan will activate more Airbases away from the eastern border. This listed location (Nasirabad site) is approx 100 miles west of Pakistanis strategically weakest (narrowest) point. As per Indian Army war plans, swift IA Armoured thrust should be able to split Pakistan in half cutting North from South.
 
.
... Which no one can do without INNER help.... The real and most dangerous enemies are within our borders, not on the other side.... You eliminate the inner ones, you just made the job of the outer ones that much difficult.

True, but what about these:





I was in contact with Kulbhushan,Iranian agency, Uzair tells magistrate

The nests of terrorists, tangled, untangled across Karachi, Balochistan



Pakistan blames Iran-based separatists for deadly Baluchistan attack
 
Last edited:
.
Missiles, Radars, fighter jets, ranges and war tactics all have evolved significantly. You will see Pakistan will activate more Airbases away from the eastern border. This listed location (Nasirabad site) is approx 100 miles west of Pakistanis strategically weakest (narrowest) point. As per Indian Army war plans, swift IA Armoured thrust should be able to split Pakistan in half cutting North from South.
we literally have a full fledge operational airbase right next to it.....
swift IA Armored thrusts have never worked along the border .....
it is always Pakistan that invades first and then most of the warfare happens inside Indian borders(i.e. trying to push us back). no matter what indians think of that is not going to change for forseeable future.
 
.
we literally have a full fledge operational airbase right next to it.....
swift IA Armored thrusts have never worked along the border .....
it is always Pakistan that invades first and then most of the warfare happens inside Indian borders(i.e. trying to push us back). no matter what indians think of that is not going to change for forseeable future.
That is a PA strategy all along. limited fight to end the war on favourable term before the country run out of juice to support the war effort. PA expect daddy, to comes and saves the day through an UN-mandated ceasefire. I think this is a failed strategy, and may not work next time. If you are not planing to win the war, you are essentially planning to lose it.
 
.
That is a PA strategy all along. limited fight to end the war on favourable term before the country run out of juice to support the war effort. PA expect daddy, to comes and saves the day through an UN-mandated ceasefire. I think this is a failed strategy, and may not work next time. If you are not planing to win the war, you are essentially planning to lose it.
well it is only feasible strategy we have.
we can not realistically hope for Indian capitulation in any war owing to its vast territory and resources. This only makes sense. all we need to do is to outfight them without giving any ground and without gaining too much ground.
coming to the point. the base in question does not serve any Pakistani objective so the only possible explanation being the facilitation of American presence inside Pakistan.
 
.
Instead going here and there in thread, we should have faith in PAF doing this to burn down enemies , we have enemy's all around us ... So need to improve PAF presence and strength in coming year's to face these enemies and give solid shutup call
 
.
well it is only feasible strategy we have.
we can not realistically hope for Indian capitulation in any war owing to its vast territory and resources. This only makes sense. all we need to do is to outfight them without giving any ground and without gaining too much ground.
coming to the point. the base in question does not serve any Pakistani objective so the only possible explanation being the facilitation of American presence inside Pakistan.
It has been done by people riding on horses' backs. it can surely be done by people flying jets and riding airconditioned armoured vehicles. Strategy is the name of the game. Proper prior planning, prevent piss poor proformance.
 
.
It has been done by people riding on horses' backs. it can surely be done by people flying jets and riding airconditioned armoured vehicles. Strategy is the name of the game. Proper prior planning, prevent piss poor proformance.
ty.jpg
 
.
Back
Top Bottom