Bilal Khan (Quwa)
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2016
- Messages
- 7,004
- Reaction score
- 97
- Country
- Location
@MastanKhan's point is that the PAF should've taken the fight to the IAF when it had the chance to do so. If there were supposedly 9 planes on lock, then it should've shot them down. Not only that, but while the IAF was in panic, there should have been a plan involving the PA to make a push across the LoC and, in turn, actually make Kashmir into a disputed territory in reality (i.e., Pakistan taking big chunks of IOK -- which would then force India to appeal to the UN and, as a result, open its books on its treatment of Kashmir). Finally, if the Kashmiri people are agitated, then a Pakistani entry would've been embraced with open arms, leading to a popular revolt ala 1971 in E. Pak.Would you like to elaborate on your statement in detail please on both points.
Instead, Pakistan took its foot of the gas pedal, and has not only given India time to analyze and correct its faults in the air skirmish, but fully push ahead with legally annexing Kashmir.
The world knows full of India's shadiness in Kashmir (as it does re: Israel in Palestine), but in realpolitik, the only things that make nations move is war. If Pakistan had forcibly taken some key territory in IOK, then the world would be forced to address the issue, and Pakistan can line up every IOK Kashmiri to bear witness to India's treatment of them. Pakistan might have even lucked out with a few countries accepting Pakistani takeover of disputed IOK areas, which then sets a precedent for others (years or decades down the line) to follow suit. Pretty much what Israel did to get its hands on Jerusalem.
Last edited: