PAF JF-17 in Farnborough Air Show 2010
- Thread starter Myth_buster_1
- Start date
khanasifm
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2008
- Messages
- 7,082
- Reaction score
- 6
Observation
WMD-7 pod look bulky and too heavy for under intake pylon for JF-17, so does the jammer. Any one took pic. of the specs for WMD-7 & Jammer pod, weight type of IR/Laser target spot etc.
Additional two pylons pylons being added where?
One reason perhaps going to Western types due to size and weight advantages unless the observation from photos is wrong.
Anyone knows if Multiple missile /SD-10 A Launcher will be adopted for JF-17
WMD-7 pod look bulky and too heavy for under intake pylon for JF-17, so does the jammer. Any one took pic. of the specs for WMD-7 & Jammer pod, weight type of IR/Laser target spot etc.
Additional two pylons pylons being added where?
One reason perhaps going to Western types due to size and weight advantages unless the observation from photos is wrong.
Anyone knows if Multiple missile /SD-10 A Launcher will be adopted for JF-17
Dazzler
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2008
- Messages
- 9,163
- Reaction score
- 31
- Country
- Location
WMD-7 has almost exact dimensions as the Damocles pod so no worries.
KG300G is infact slimmer and lighter than ALQ-131 so again that is quite ok
Close up pics are still the order of the day for specs of both WMD-7 and KG300G.
SD-10 will have dual launcher on JFTs as per my info and to better utilize rather conventional payload. More info is always welcome.
Similar threads
- Article
