Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I dont know if this is true unless verified. Twin engine makes me think again.
No it is not.
No it is not.
Confirmed Future PAF Fleet
30-50 FBC-1 Flying Leopard
36-40 F-10A/B Vanguard
12 F-16C Block 52+ Fighting Falcon
6 F-16D Block 52+ Fighting Falcon
34 F-16A Block 15 MLU-3 Fighting Falcon
26 F-16B Block 15 MLU-3 Fighting Falcon
150 JF-17 Thunder
6 Saab 2000 Erieye AEW&C + 1 training Aircraft
4 IL-78 Midas Air-to-Air Refueling Aircraft
12 C-130H w/6 reserve C-130H Medium Lift Transport Aircraft
39+ K-8 Intermediate Jet Trainer
*Additional F-10A/B Vanguard will be procured.
*JF-17 fleet may rise from 150 to 200-250
*The PAF may procure an additional 33 F-16C/D Block 52+.
*The PAF will procure an unspecified number of Sino-Pak developed AEW&C aircraft.
*Plans to procure an Advanced Lead in Jet Trainer to replace the FT-5 and the FT-6 in a fighter conversion role, e.g., the L-15, L-159B or T-50.
More info on 30-50 FBC-1 Flying Leopard please.
New Recruit
Looks like a good plane. I don't know if its a good idea to not replace the A-5 with a specialized bomber, I think we definitely should get the Flying Leopard after induction of JF-17 and F-16s is well underway.
I don't think PAF should buy the FBC-1s,just waste of money.J-10,JF-17,or F-16 are all mult-function fighter,they have the potential to develop into fighting-attackers.
Very glad to see a more powerfull PAF!
I dont think PAf needs FBC-1. The J-10s and F-16s are multi-role. Inducting an FBC-1 will just increase costs and logistical problems. Also FBC-1 wont be very good in air-to-air roles, so PAF will have to use fighter aircraft as escorts. Might as well use the money to get more J-10s. They'll b able to fend for themselves and can be used for ground attack.