What's new

PAF F-7 crashes shortly after take off!

.
It chewed up a crow and the the compresor stopped. that is why he had to eject.
 
. .
Damn the local government first for not taking care of proper trash disposal, civilians for junking the area and then the poor bird which is the nature's way of trash disposal ;) :P
 
.
Knowing that armoured vehicles can be dropped from cargo aircraft by means of parachutes............I was thinking why its not possible to install or fit two such parachutes in the airframe which can be deployed in the event of technical failure to land the plane gently and thus saving a lot of spares even if the aircraft is damaged......

One parachute can be installed in the back of the cockpit and another near the vertical tail fin..........the parachutes should be triggered by the ejection seat going off........once the pilot ejects...the parachute should deploy to gently land the aircraft........there are thousands of costly parts which can be saved.........But this idea can only be tested with a handsome funding and available hardware.
 
.
damn thats really sad, i don't know why PAF still using these craft, they are now too old and it is really risky for our precious pilots to fly these old things. May be pilots themselves first get prepared or ready to eject before loading in such planes LOLZ. why we are using those damn risky things?????????????
 
.
Knowing that armoured vehicles can be dropped from cargo aircraft by means of parachutes............I was thinking why its not possible to install or fit two such parachutes in the airframe which can be deployed in the event of technical failure to land the plane gently and thus saving a lot of spares even if the aircraft is damaged......

One parachute can be installed in the back of the cockpit and another near the vertical tail fin..........the parachutes should be triggered by the ejection seat going off........once the pilot ejects...the parachute should deploy to gently land the aircraft........there are thousands of costly parts which can be saved.........But this idea can only be tested with a handsome funding and available hardware.

Such a device was already created for light aircraft. However a modern jet would be substainally heavier than a light aircraft.
 
.
damn thats really sad, i don't know why PAF still using these craft, they are now too old and it is really risky for our precious pilots to fly these old things. May be pilots themselves first get prepared or ready to eject before loading in such planes LOLZ. why we are using those damn risky things?????????????

Dude if you took a new F-22 on take off, and threw a Crow into its engine chances are it would crash too.
 
.
ya friend i agree with you but don't you think that these crafts like f-7, a-5, f-6, are old enough now. i know the reason is crow, but many times many technical faults cause accidents and most of technical faults are due to aged parts. isn't so.
 
.
ya friend i agree with you but don't you think that these crafts like f-7, a-5, f-6, are old enough now. i know the reason is crow, but many times many technical faults cause accidents and most of technical faults are due to aged parts. isn't so.

F-6's ..... They have already been retired
F-7's and A-5's will be replaced by JF-17 thunder soon.

Besides, technical faults can occur on any kindaa aircraft even if its new...we do get to listen plenty of incidents regarding air crashes all around the world and that includes most modern aircrafts as well.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom