What's new

Out of the box ideas to penetrate modern bmds

. . . .
with evolution of laser and satelite which may be used to emit cancer causing radiation to specific region no one will need nukes and missile to kill enemy
What about the laws of physics which rays and what will be its source of energy i. e for such a large amount of radiation. And so on
 
.
Sir how so?
Depends.

They are becoming obsolete if you are looking forward to challenge US in the years to come: https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/out-...trate-modern-bmds.574397/page-2#post-10743138

However, they have not lost their value in conflicts, and will remain relevant for years to come. Better to have the numbers then nothing.

Pakistan see in ballistic missiles and cruise missiles, tools of deterrence. Winning the war, is not important; hurting the enemy is.
 
.
Depends.

They are becoming obsolete if you are looking forward to challenge US in the years to come: https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/out-...trate-modern-bmds.574397/page-2#post-10743138

However, they have not lost their value in conflicts, and will remain relevant for years to come. Better to have the numbers then nothing.

Pakistan see in ballistic missiles and cruise missiles, tools of deterrence. Winning the war, is not important; hurting the enemy is.
But sir for strike you will have to transport something physical eg a nuke whether fission fusion or annihilation reaction based. The system
(Any todays or future system) must be defendable
And energy efficient. These star wars sci fi concepts are decades away if not centuries.
 
. .
MIRV is the best solution. The more warheads you have in a single Missile system the better.
Best option so far. :agree:

Also Jammers
:no:

Very expensive and difficult route.

https://blog.bliley.com/understanding-aesa-radar-tech

Russia have employed its EW capabilities to great effect in Ukraine and Syria but achieved mixed results with them. These measures were effective in Ukraine but NATO (in Syria) proved much resilient.

Some AESA radars are simply too big and powerful to overwhelm. And with CEC in the picture! Forget it.
 
.
Best option so far. :agree:


:no:

Very expensive and difficult route.

https://blog.bliley.com/understanding-aesa-radar-tech

Russia have employed its EW capabilities to great effect in Ukraine and Syria but achieved mixed results with them. These measures were effective in Ukraine but NATO (in Syria) proved much resilient.

Some AESA radars are simply too big and powerful to overwhelm. And with CEC in the picture! Forget it.
That's s why sir we have to absorb and deflect in opposite direction technology used in stealth fighters at least during midcourse
Phase. To reduce the range of locking radar i. e
X band radar
 
. . . .
today maybe sir but we must think and work for tomorrow.
This cat and mouse game will continue between missiles and missile defence to make one another obsolete if you use missiles for missile defense ..I am sure shortly missiles becomes obsolete in both offensive and defensive role .
 
.
This cat and mouse game will continue between missiles and missile defence to make one another obsolete if you use missiles for missile defense ..I am sure shortly missiles becomes obsolete in both offensive and defensive role .
In defense yes but in offensive may take more time. See there are physical limits on technology which we sometimes euphorically forget
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom