Our tool kit to tackle terror not restricted, India tells Pakistan

[That Guy]

If you want a private conversation get a room, this is a forum.

I asked a serious question. How is that trolling ?

You are the one claiming Modi should mind his words, its is reasonable to ask why and what you are going to do about it. So what is your answer ?

Your comment was insulting, that was my problem with your comment.

Your question was "will you send more terrorists?", that's like me asking "are you going to rape someone today?". That's insulting, and you know it.

If you were a bit more polite, then I would have answered immediately. No doubt, even the Indian members on here would find your words in poor taste.

 

[Sahasranama]

Your comment was insulting, that was my problem with your comment.

Your question was "will you send more terrorists?", that's like me asking "are you going to rape someone today?". That's insulting, and you know it.

If you were a bit more polite, then I would have answered immediately. No doubt, even the Indian members on here would find your words in poor taste.

If some one is a known Rapist then asking about his plans for raping somebody is not insulting at all. Especially if he takes pride in his deeds.

So What is the problem if I ask whether pakistan has plans to send more terrorist, when we all know and acknowledged that terrorism is part of your state apparatus and state policy ?

You know it, I know it, the whole world knows it. Why pretend otherwise ?

so my question still stands, what is the answer ?

If you have a skin thick enough to support terrorism and then pretend it does not exist they one assumes the skin is thick enough to take tough questions.

 

[That Guy]

If some one is a known Rapist then asking about his plans for raping somebody is not insulting at all. Especially if he takes pride in his deeds.

So What is the problem if I ask whether pakistan has plans to send more terrorist, when we all know and acknowledged that terrorism is part of your state apparatus and state policy ?

You know it, I know it, the whole world knows it. Why pretend otherwise ?

so my question still stands, what is the answer ?

If you have a skin thick enough to support terrorism and then pretend it does not exist they one assumes the skin is thick enough to take tough questions.

No, you accused me directly of sending terrorists, or are you ignoring your own words? And no, only nationalistic Indians say that terrorism is apart of Pakistan's national policy, when it is not.

The only one pretend is you, especially when you insult other people and then proceed to not address that criticism.

As for your question, it's not up to me to decide what happens. I criticize, but I'm another just another person on this forum. Why should he be careful with his words? To make sure that he doesn't destroy what little progress that has been made in the last few years between India and Pakistan. What am I going to do about it? Why are you asking me? I'm not the one who decides policies.

Next time, instead of using inflammatory comments, try being a bit more subtle.

 

[Sahasranama]

No, you accused me directly of sending terrorists, or are you ignoring your own words? And no, only nationalistic Indians say that terrorism is apart of Pakistan's national policy, when it is not.

The only one pretend is you, especially when you insult other people and then proceed to not address that criticism.

As for your question, it's not up to me to decide what happens. I criticize, but I'm another just another person on this forum. Why should he be careful with his words? To make sure that he doesn't destroy what little progress that has been made in the last few years between India and Pakistan. What am I going to do about it? Why are you asking me? I'm not the one who decides policies.

Next time, instead of using inflammatory comments, try being a bit more subtle.

LOL. Why would I accuse you of sending terrorists ? ... you are just an random name in a forum. It is ridiculous to assume I would personally accuse you of anything except hypocrisy.

Even if I am not a nationalistic Indian, the fact would remain that using terrorists is part of pakistan's unstated national policy. This is known to everyone in the world. My being Indian has got nothing to do with this.

What is this progress between india and pakistan you are talking about ? safety and security of a nation triumphs every other national consideration. Self preservation is the fist cardinal rule of life. As long as terrorism as an instrument of state policy continues, noting has changed.

Modi is free to use the harshest words as using them changes nothing, except introduce people to reality.

 

[Spring Onion]

Pakistan should go slow with its strategic assets, this guy is very strong willed and can match his words with actions.

dont worry we wont let him steal the show

 

[That Guy]

LOL. Why would I accuse you of sending terrorists ? ... you are just an random name in a forum. It is ridiculous to assume I would personally accuse you of anything except hypocrisy.

Even if I am not a nationalistic Indian, the fact would remain that using terrorists is part of pakistan's unstated national policy. This is known to everyone in the world. My being Indian has got nothing to do with this.

What is this progress between india and pakistan you are talking about ? safety and security of a nation triumphs every other national consideration. Self preservation is the fist cardinal rule of life. As long as terrorism as an instrument of state policy continues, noting has changed.

Modi is free to use the harshest words as using them changes nothing, except introduce people to reality.

You know what? I've had enough of dealing with you, considering that it's clear you have little to no idea of what we were even talking about. I was having a civil conversation with another Indian member, and you had to butt in and start trolling. You're still new, so I won't report you for your inflammatory language, but I warn you, others on this forum (including Indian members) aren't as tolerant as myself, you'll find them less forgiving.

 

[Sahasranama]

You know what? I've had enough. I was having a civil conversation with another Indian member, and you had to butt in and start trolling. You're still new, so I won't report you for your inflammatory language, but I warn you, others on this forum aren't as tolerant as me.

That's quite all right. I never expected you to have gumption to answer the question anyway.

For someone who is quick to take offence and warn others and label others as trolls, you are equally quick to declare yourself tolerant. But I suppose that a subjective term in this forum.

 

[That Guy]

That's quite all right. I never expected you to have gumption to answer the question anyway.

For someone who is quick to take offence and warn others and label others as trolls, you are equally quick to declare yourself tolerant. But I suppose that a subjective term in this forum.

I answered the question, but it seems you're going to ignore that part.

I call you a troll, because you used inflammatory language during a civil conversation, going around throwing accusations, just to get an angry reaction.

I tolerate you, that doesn't mean I respect you.

 

[MilSpec]

Pakistan is fighting a full fledged war against terrorism and is not supporting or harboring anti india activities. In fact Pakistan's grievance is that its india that is supporting anti-Pakistan elements in Afghanistan

Are you implying that India is capable of engaging the mighty pakistani army with some alleged rental militant? What does that say about pakistani military, more than the what does that say about your own countrymen?

If you are not doing it why don't deny and say say that Pakistan WILL NOT support any anti India element from it's soil?

Well then they might have more guns pointed inwards...

dont worry we wont let him steal the show

Ohh, we are sure you won't.... The is quite a bit of cannon fodder that you would send to our way...

 

[Sahasranama]

I answered the question, but it seems you're going to ignore that part.

I call you a troll, because you used inflammatory language during a civil conversation, going around throwing accusations, just to get an angry reaction.

I tolerate you, that doesn't mean I respect you.

A provocative question is not trolling. If it angers somebody then they need to address their guilty complex for making them angry.

I don't care for your respect, only for exposing the truth. Not all my questions were answered. You choose to run away quoting challenges to your "tolerance".

 

[Spring Onion]

Ohh, we are sure you won't.... The is quite a bit of cannon fodder that you would send to our way...

From now on Modi people will manufacture the fodder locally

 

[That Guy]

A provocative question is not trolling. If it angers somebody then they need to address their guilty complex for making them angry.

What do I have to feel guilt for? Don't make such foolish comments.

I don't care for your respect, only for exposing the truth. Not all my questions were answered. You choose to run away quoting challenges to your "tolerance".

Fine, you want me to answer your questions? Provide them, I'll answer them one by one. I was choosing to let this incident slide, but I see now that you'll just harass me until I do answer you.

So ask away.

 

[MilSpec]

Modi needs to make absolutely clear that he's serious about peace with Pakistan, and that includes him not making inflammatory speeches against Pakistan.

Did he make any inflammatory speech? He has categorically stated the straight ground reality experienced by our military. Pakistani military aids, trains, sponsors, bolsters asymmetrical warfare against India via militants. Plenty clear with cover fire during infiltration bids, recovered weapons and ammunition, reality of kargil.

Making peace with pakistan has a better chance with a realistic view of the situation and gauging the strategic reality than some imaginary fluff created by the UPA incompetent leaders.

 

[Sahasranama]

What do I have to feel guilt for? Don't make such foolish comments.

How do I know ? You need to ask yourself that question. Why does my questions make you angry ?

Fine, you want me to answer your questions? Provide them, I'll answer them one by one. I was choosing to let this incident slide, but I see now that you'll just harass me until I do answer you.

So ask away.

Not at all, feel free to run away. Once you do, I will stop asking you questions.

What is the progress between India & pak relations that you are talking about ? how does Modi's speech change that ? will pakistan continue to send terrorists if Modi speak the uncomfortable truth ?

 

[That Guy]

Did he make any inflammatory speech? He has categorically stated the straight ground reality experienced by our military. Pakistani military aids, trains, sponsors, bolsters asymmetrical warfare against India via militants. Plenty clear with cover fire during infiltration bids, recovered weapons and ammunition, reality of kargil.

You know better than I do that most of these are unproven claims. Even if they were correct, what does that have to do with the original comment of mine? Why did he bring up a completely irrelevant issue? We're talking about Modi, not about Kashmir.

I call them inflammatory, as he implied that Pakistanis in general were supporting terrorists. Note the word he used was "you" and not "PA" or "government".

Making peace with pakistan has a better chance with a realistic view of the situation and gauging the strategic reality than some imaginary fluff created by the UPA incompetent leaders.

I agree, but you need to realize that not everything is Pakistan's fault, and India itself is also guilty of firing indiscriminately at Pakistani soldiers. This idea that Pakistan is always guilty, and India is always innocent is completely absurd idea.

But anyway, that has nothing to do with improving relations. Kashmir won't be solved easily, but that doesn't mean Pakistan and India cannot improve their relations. If India and China can do business while still having a border dispute, why can't Pakistan and India?