What's new

Opinion | 10 'outrageously unthinkable' yet pragmatic solutions to Pakistan's major problems.

Kompromat

ADMINISTRATOR
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
40,366
Reaction score
416
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
Disclaimer | This thread is strictly for academic/hypothetical discussion only.


Introduction.

Most of Pakistan's security related issues are a product of our will to 'volunteer' ourselves for every Muslim cause on planet earth, especially in our own region. Most terrorist organizations in Pakistan today started abroad and we allowed them to flourish in Pakistan in the name of 'help'. I-e The Mujahideen, The Taliban were Afghans, Lashkar e Taiba and Hizb ul mujahideen were Kashmiri organizations - we even went as far as sheltering PLO the Palestinian organization.

We have turned ourselves into mercenaries who fight for 'other people' and their freedoms. We fought for Afghans,Kashmiris,Somalis,Saudis,Jordanians,Egyptians,Iraqis,Syrians,Bosnians,Kosovites - It had nothing to do with Pakistan. The most depressing lesson is that they don't even know our name. So i feel obliged to ask the question, 'why did we do it' ?

Here are a few ideas i am presenting to you guys to discuss and give me your responses. The ideas i think will help Pakistan in its security conundrum as well as help us establish peace in Pakistan. Dear friends, you must understand that Pakistan is in a state of survival - therefore drastic steps would have to be made. This hypothesis bases itself on the sense of security generated out of our Nuclear deterrent, which i believe gives us time to look away from the outside to look inwards.


1: 'Quit Afghanistan | Strategic depth is dead'


Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, is a thing of the past. USSR is dead, now if Russians invade again, they would have to invade many C.Asian countries before they get to Pakistan. Moreover in regards to India, Pakistan has nuclear weapons and if our existence is threatened we can vaporise them in response. Therefore they won't mount an invasion of Pakistan, therefore the strategic depth is not needed, therefore Afghanistan is now irrelevant to our strategic calculus as far as a scenario of Indian invasion is concerned.

We should stop ALL interventions in Afghan affairs, allow India to have the transit to Afghanistan and Afghanistan to India in return of full recognition of the Durand line from Afghanistan, and Indian assurances of not using the Afghan soil for destabilizing Pakistan. Pakistan should refrain from Afghan affairs, altogether. We should NEVER help them EVER again in case of another invasion, let them fend for themselves. Should the worst case scenario of a hostile Afghanistan and a hostile India at the same time arise, we should focus all of our military assets to defend ourselves through a concentrated effort.


2: 'Referendum in Azad Kashmir'


Imagine if we liberate Kashmir through a military invasion from India. Then we conduct a free and fair referendum in Kashmir. If you are thinking that they will opt for joining Pakistan, you are wrong. Kashmiris will have no regard for Pakistani help, we will be taken for granted and Kashmiris will instead opt for an independent nation. Kashmir counts for 90% of our international diplomatic and security related problems, despite our best efforts we cannot 'win' as the great Muslim liberator as we hope to be.

I suggest, we should conduct a referendum in Azad Kashmir with following choices.

1: Join Pakistan formally - support Pakistani efforts to turn LOC into an international border with India.

2: Become an independant state.

Its a win win situation for Pakistan either way if we stop thinking of Kashmir as a 'Muslim problem/Pakistani problem' because it is not. It is a Kashmiri problem and they are the ones who need to solve it. If they choose the 1st option in a vast majority, we mount serious efforts of peacemaking with India.

If they choose the 2nd option, its a win win for us as we will help them become a new country, UN member, OIC member and then we can leave them alone to deal with the Indians,they would have to worry about the diplomatic/military strife with India, not us. It will become a 'Kashmiri Problem' - and this territory will act as a buffer between us and Indian forces. I would rather have Indian forces patrol Kashmiri streets than patrolling mine. Kashmiri freedom is worth Pakistani blood? - i wonder if it is and how much of it will be enough. We are giving blood since 1947.


3: Isolation from Arab-Iran rivalry.


Pakistan is a nuclear power and cannot be invaded, why should we be fighting as mercenaries for others? - I want no Pakistani boots outside Pakistan for ANY reason, for ANY country. Arab Iranian rivalry has a racist undertone, which Pakistan must not become a part of. We should allow them to solve their differences peacefully or go to war. Pakistan must not take EITHER SIDE, and remain totally neutral.

No Arab/Persian forces have helped us in 1948-1965-1971. It was us who were fighting for them not them fighting for us. We all know what the odds are of any military assistance from Iran or Arabs in any future war with India, don't we? - They won't come to our help, when we need them the most. - Pakistan therefore needs to become neutral -we need not to meddle in their affairs nor we allow them to meddle into ours.


4: Recognize Israel


If Kashmir = Palestine than why Arabs and Iranians and Turks are allowed to recognize India while Pakistan is not allowed to recognize Israel? - Why they are allowed to trade with India, but Pakistan is not allowed to trade with Israel? - Pakistan should recognize Israel in return for unrestricted access to American and European markets and preferential trade agreements - as well as Pakistan gets the NSG membership. It will equal out our relations with the Arabs and the Iranians vis a vis Kashmir and India, and will improve our international standing by presenting us as a mature nation.


5: Join SCO


Pakistan should join SCO at all costs - dim its role in the OIC. Focus on China, Russia, C.Asia and India for trade and making the most of our geographic importance.


6: Build and maintain a powerful Military muscle and Military industries.


If we adopt the above policy we need to build a potent conventional military muscle, big enough to provide impeccable national defense - to flush out the terrorist outfits - and small enough that cant be used in attacking any other nation in the world. Pakistan military should ONLY be used to defend Pakistanis. We should not care who's bombing Afghanistan and who's dumping Kashmiris in mass graves. As long as its not us getting killed, it shouldn't affect our military thinking.


7: Apologise to Bangladesh & normalize relations.


We need to apologise to Bangladesh for our brutality inflicted upon them in 1971 - in return for free trade agreements and normalization of the bilateral ties.


8: Non intervention in the Muslim world


When was the last time you saw Turks,Indonesians and Malaysians intervening in other countries to 'protect Muslims' ? - NEVER. We need to do the same, we need to learn to ignore what happens in the Muslim world, so we can focus on ourselves. It should not be an issue to us, if Israelis bomb Palestinians,Lebanese and Egyptians, Burmese monks kill Rohingas, Serbs kill bosnians or Indians bomb Kashmiris. We should not intervene - they are not worth a drop of Pakistani blood.


9: Become a Business minded society


Every F.policy favor we render to ANYONE - has to be in return for business favors returned to us. Once we build our economy, we send our kids to schools and universities - than we can think about other goals.


10: Pacifist/Non-interventionist Pakistan


Pakistan should give up its alliance with the US, normalize its ties with the US as a non aligned nation, bolster ties with China,Russia, India , Brazil and EU. A Pakistan that is indifferent to the security climate in other nations as long as its not us. We should never wage war on other nations-nor become partisans in one.


By doing this, we can reinvent our position in the world as a self centric country that is pro business - pro trade and anti conflict.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have your say.

Peace.



@Hyperion @ajpirzada @Irfan Baloch @Oscar @Argus Panoptes @Zarvan @Marshmallow @Armstrong @Xeric @Icarus @muse @Mosamania @Hussein @A-Team @Sher Malang @ghilzai @Pak-one and others.
 
Last edited:
.
Dude, you wrote this??? Very well done! (this is the first time I'm giving a thumbs up to something written by a member here on PDF) :tup:

Your premises are correct and arguments have weight. A few minor adjustments and you can publish it.
 
. .
Are you crazy man ???? If Pakistan meets even 50% of the goals you posted above, it would lead it to becoming a stable and prosperous nation. It seems however that the average Pakistani thinking in society as gathered from many Pakistani members on PDF that Pakistan achieved statehood for amongst others the following primary reasons :-

1. Bleed India and wipe out those evil Yindoos or blame them for all its problems
2. Become a powerful and leading Islamic state at the forefront of the Caliphate
3. Unite the ummah


and when all else fails .....

revert to point number 1 above.
 
. .
Dude, you wrote this??? Very well done! (this is the first time I'm giving a thumbs up to something written by a member here on PDF) :tup:

Your premises are correct and arguments have weight. A few minor adjustments and you can publish it.

Im writing an edited version with sources and footnotes - will send you the draft for peer reviewing if you don't mind?

Can't argue with the rest. But you may want to consider creating an inclusive Pakistani identity as a national project as one more point.

Thats what EXACTLY i mean by 'looking inwards'. When we are not fighting as mercenaries for others, we would have time to do the things that NEED TO BE DONE, in Pakistan

Are you crazy man ???? If Pakistan meets even 50% of the goals you posted above, it would lead it to becoming a stable and prosperous nation. It seems however that the average Pakistani thinking in society as gathered from many Pakistani members on PDF that Pakistan achieved statehood for amongst others the following primary reasons :-

1. Bleed India and wipe out those evil Yindoos or blame them for all its problems
2. Become a powerful and leading Islamic state at the forefront of the Caliphate
3. Unite the ummah


and when all else fails .....

revert to point number 1 above.


Most of that is wishful thinking. I want Pakistan to go go to sleep when every other Muslim country sees themselves as Muslims first - only then we can walk in a pack. Until then --- we need to go to sleep and focus on ourselves, why bleed for others?

I agree with some, disagree with others ! :)

Speak your heart out!
 
.
Do send Lala, will be my pleasure..... :tup:

Im writing an edited version with sources and footnotes - will send you the draft for peer reviewing if you don't mind?



Thats what EXACTLY i mean by 'looking inwards'. When we are not fighting as mercenaries for others, we would have time to do the things that NEED TO BE DONE, in Pakistan




Most of that is wishful thinking. I want Pakistan to go go to sleep when every other Muslim country sees themselves as Muslims first - only then we can walk in a pack. Until then --- we need to go to sleep and focus on ourselves, why bleed for others?
 
. .
Do send Lala, will be my pleasure..... :tup:

I'm writing a 3000+ word piece on 'how to save our asss' from Arab-o-Persian rivalry too, will send you that one. I will send you both when i finish them slowly.

Actually that's a very nice point......

Im sick and tired of being taken for granted - NO Pakistani blood for ANYONE , no matter how many 'Muhammads' they have in their names - They don't fight for us, why should we fight for them?
 
. .
as we speak our soldiers are fighting as mercenaries in Bahrain killing the protesters in the name of the oppressive Saudi origin Ruling family. this act is not only creating more hate for us among the population but also not earning us any favours among Arab kings who have still not "forgiven" us for not taking part in the assault on Iraq in the first gulf war and dismissed our puny force we sent. re Palestine, the PLO/ Arafat were very close to India and spat on the name of Pakistan. maybe there was some reason behind it since Zia as Brigadier crushed them in Jordan in Black September operation. Lybians, iraqis and Palestinians together with Al Zulfiqar had been involved in terrorism in Pakistan back in the days when most of the members were not even conceived.

so yes, I agree, let the Arab racist sectarian Mullah smash his head with the arrogant Persian arrogant Ayatullah let them kill each other off like they have been since the recorded history for all we care. agree with everything including Kashmir, Afghanistan and Israel as well with just one clarification that by strategic depth we only mean having a Pakistan friendly or a nonHostile regime in Afghanistan that doesnt finger us and helps India to instigate the Balochistan insurgency. nothing more nothing less
 
.
Hence the need for a Pakistani identity........ he is right about that..........

Food for thought: All our lives we have seen this mentality "Sindhi hum, Baluchi Hum, Punjabi Hum, Pathan Hum, Hum sub Pakistani"...... now the thing is, we forgot to emphasize who are Pakistanis????? The only recourse we gave those empty minds was "Hum Mussalman"....... and that's where the problem lies........ The Salafists, The Persians hijacked that "Mussalman" and sold their versions as our identity.....

Instead of us wiping our "Sindhi/Baluchi/Punjabi/Pashtun" heritages, we should have fostered and integrated those into the mainstream and given it cumulative identity of being a Pakistani (that these sub cultures define Pakistan)...... we made a huge mistake there!!!!

Im sick and tired of being taken for granted - NO Pakistani blood for ANYONE , no matter how many 'Muhammads' they have in their names - They don't fight for us, why should we fight for them?
 
.
Forget India in each and every security/defense/strategic dimension............ alas pakistan don't have any worry and have spare money for development and growth. :angel:
 
.
Did you know that everytime Yasir Arafat visited India, he flew over Pakistan and NOT ONCE landed in Pakistan!!! He used to go and utter all sort of *BS* against Pakistan in N. Delhi............ and I remember the **** that broke loose in Islamabad, where dozens of Arab embassies were providing weapons to insurgents in Pakistan...... I was just two years old, but as dad was very busy and tense, I still remember it......

as we speak our soldiers are fighting as mercenaries in Bahrain killing the protesters in the name of the oppressive Saudi origin Ruling family. this act is not only creating more hate for us among the population but also not earning us any favours among Arab kings who have still not "forgiven" us for not taking part in the assault on Iraq in the first gulf war and dismissed our puny force we sent. re Palestine, the PLO/ Arafat were very close to India and spat on the name of Pakistan. maybe there was some reason behind it since Zia as Brigadier crushed them in Jordan in Black September operation. Lybians, iraqis and Palestinians together with Al Zulfiqar had been involved in terrorism in Pakistan back in the days when most of the members were not even conceived.

so yes, I agree, let the Arab racist sectarian Mullah smash his head with the arrogant Persian arrogant Ayatullah let them kill each other off like they have been since the recorded history for all we care. agree with everything including Kashmir, Afghanistan and Israel as well with just one clarification that by strategic depth we only mean having a Pakistan friendly or a nonHostile regime in Afghanistan that doesnt finger us and helps India to instigate the Balochistan insurgency. nothing more nothing less
 
.
3: Isolation from Arab-Iran rivalry.

Pakistan is a nuclear power and cannot be invaded, why should we be fighting as mercenaries for others? - I want no Pakistani boots outside Pakistan for ANY reason, for ANY country. Arab Iranian rivalry has a racist undertone, which Pakistan must not become a part of. We should allow them to solve their differences peacefully or go to war. Pakistan must not take EITHER SIDE, and remain totally neutral.

No Arab/Persian forces have helped us in 1948-1965-1971. It was us who were fighting for them not them fighting for us. We all know what the odds are of any military assistance from Iran or Arabs in any future war with India, don't we? - They won't come to our help, when we need them the most. - Pakistan therefore needs to become neutral -we need not meddle in their affairs nor we allow them to meddle into ours.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/senior...olution-pakistans-problems.html#ixzz2ct4p1fah

This is the most important point. Stay out of their mess it won't be solved in next 5 decades.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom