Operation Asifa: 45 Indian soldiers killed by Kashmiri resistance in Pulwama.

[Crixus]

The India's Pakistan policy has nothing to do with the Party in power it makes no diff if its BJP or Congress .... go through the history and you will find Congress remained more hostile towards Pakistan

with BJP in power , I doubt a right decision will come out but rather a extreme and emotional one .

 

[M. Sarmad]

Looks like Pak Govt. has already condemned the terror attacks. Must be a first.

Pakistan condemns all acts of violence in IoK, no matter who the perpetrators are. And no, it was not a "terror attack"



The attack in Pulwama in the Indian Occupied Jammu & Kashmir is a matter of grave concern.

We have always condemned heightened acts of violence in the Valley.

We strongly reject any insinuation by elements in the Indian government and media circles that seek to link the attack to the State of Pakistan without investigations.
http://www.mofa.gov.pk/pr-details.php?mm=NzU5Mw,,

 

[American Pakistani]

last when we came we changed your geography ..... this time whole Pak might turned up in desert ...... be thankful to god that you are in US

Last time you only came with fake sir ji kal strykee, before that in 2008 you only b1tched, same thing in 2002, in 1999 you were slaughtered like a chicken, before that in 71 you won after taking advantage of civil war and a land cut off completely with defense of only 34k troops, in 65 again you were crushed, and in 48 huge chunk of Kashmir was liberated, before that in 47 you were thrashed out of Pakistan. So stop b1tching like a dehati aurat.

I can change flags to Argentina if I want, so? The point is how are you so sure if I'm in US, UK, Pakistan, Europe, MiddleEast, etc?

 

[Jackdaws]

Last time you only came with fake sir ji kal strykee, before that in 2008 you only b1tched, same thing in 2002, in 1999 you were slaughtered like a chicken, before that in 71 you won after taking advantage of civil war and a land cut off completely with defense of only 34k troops, in 65 again you were crushed, and in 48 huge chunk of Kashmir was liberated, before that in 47 you were thrashed out of Pakistan. So stop b1tching like a dehati aurat.

I can change flags to Argentina if I want, so? The point is how are you so sure if I'm in US, UK, Pakistan, Europe, MiddleEast, etc?

Except in the real world -

1999. Your PM went running to US to beg Clinton to stop the Indians.

1971 - land cut of completely? Lol - it housed more than 50% of your population.

1965 - is that why you went running to the UN asking for a ceasefire? Lol - must be a first in history.

1948 - after India entered into the fray, you only lost territory. But that should not be a surprise.

Cry me a river.

Soon that might be the only river you can access

 

[Rafi]

Except in the real world -

1999. Your PM went running to US to beg Clinton to stop the Indians.

1971 - land cut of completely? Lol - it housed more than 50% of your population.

1965 - is that why you went running to the UN asking for a ceasefire? Lol - must be a first in history.

1948 - after India entered into the fray, you only lost territory. But that should not be a surprise.


Soon that might be the only river you can access

It's all good, we all gotta die some day. You look death in the face and tell it to go fck itself

 

[Tom M]

Last time you only came with fake sir ji kal strykee, before that in 2008 you only b1tched, same thing in 2002, in 1999 you were slaughtered like a chicken, before that in 71 you won after taking advantage of civil war and a land cut off completely with defense of only 34k troops, in 65 again you were crushed, and in 48 huge chunk of Kashmir was liberated, before that in 47 you were thrashed out of Pakistan. So stop b1tching like a dehati aurat.

I can change flags to Argentina if I want, so? The point is how are you so sure if I'm in US, UK, Pakistan, Europe, MiddleEast, etc?

Well what happened in 2002 or 2008 ??? A proxy attack right ??

Why do you guy's expect the adversary to respond conventionally to any proxy strikes. And please don't be under the impression that you were safe during the period from 2000 through 2019.

Regarding 1999, boasting about sitting on top of a higher altitude and taking about that capability as your bravery, huh ??? Well we are doing the same with just a hand full of soldiers in Siachen for decades now, and you army of braves couldn't do a Jack till now.

1965, indeed we were crushed. But the irony was that Mr. ZA Butto was the one crying loud and clear in UNSC.

In 1971, you had a great disadvantage. Still the army of the brave never gave a reasonable fight to begin with. They just surrendered in a matter of record days.

Now what are you boasting about ??? Did Pakistan managed to achieve any of your objectives other than initiating any war without any results. India at-least managed to dismember our enemy and is still sitting on top of a glacier which her enemy claims in full.

well it won't make a difference if your govt dump the no first use policy ..
You can stop Pakistan's water which you will eventually have to open cause it will be against the International rule , You can attack Pakistan using conventional forces but you don't have enough to completely over come Pakistan Armed forces .

There is a fourth viable and very cheap option. Just wait for that.

 

[The Accountant]

Well what happened in 2002 or 2008 ??? A proxy attack right ??

Why do you guy's expect the adversary to respond conventionally to any proxy strikes. And please don't be under the impression that you were safe during the period from 2000 through 2019.

Regarding 1999, boasting about sitting on top of a higher altitude and taking about that capability as your bravery, huh ??? Well we are doing the same with just a hand full of soldiers in Siachen for decades now, and you army of braves couldn't do a Jack till now.

1965, indeed we were crushed. But the irony was that Mr. ZA Butto was the one crying loud and clear in UNSC.

In 1971, you had a great disadvantage. Still the army of the brave never gave a reasonable fight to begin with. They just surrendered in a matter of record days.

Now what are you boasting about ??? Did Pakistan managed to achieve any of your objectives other than initiating any war without any results. India at-least managed to dismember our enemy and is still sitting on top of a glacier which her enemy claims in full.



There is a fourth viable and very cheap option. Just wait for that.

If u r right then go back to 1948 when we drag u outside the azad kashmir ...

5 times bigger country is worried so much about us is the summary of how brave we are ...

 

[Hellfire]

Isn't that unwise ?? I mean there should be appropriate spacing between the buses even if the movement is administrative.

There are two peculiarities that have been seen over the past decade ever since the militancy was relatively curbed after 2006:

1. The increased pressure of the political class to do away with the necessary imposition of the prevalent rules and regulations under various laws, both civil and military, wherein no civil vehicle was either allowed to cross a military/paramilitary convoy, come in between them or approach them within a certain limit. This was predominantly due to the existence of two lane roads in majority of locations and slow moving speed of convoys causing 'delay' in traffic movement.

2. The permissiveness of the leadership, both political and military, of permitting civil vehicles from entering into the convoys and at times, leading to incidents of road traffic accidents as military vehicles are heavy carriers and the inter-se gap is usually 50 meters at least, and where a small car tends to quickly come and get in between. This, the gap, is meant to mitigate the fallout of a potential IED/suicide attack. But with the movement of civil vehicles suddenly in between the convoy vehicles, at times the gap gets reduced or increased, depending on traffic volume. This situation is easily exploited.

The failure to uphold the rules and regulations as also the SOPs was bound to have some repercussions someday. And anyways, one can not do much in such kinds of attacks if you do not have luck on your side and SOPs are not being adhered to.

It is the responsibility of both the leadership at CRPF and the political class, that needs to be questioned right now.

Also, the suicide-bomb vehicle carried 350 Kg of explosives. From where did that come ??

There is tonnes of explosives and ammunition lying buried in forests, stashed by 'couriers' over the period of time. It is neigh impossible to ensure 100% check on 'infiltration' due to the peculiarities of the terrain and the flora in the region. A single courier, moving/crawling very slowly over hours, can remain virtually undetected even with the best of conditions permitting extensive use of NVGs, TIs and Unattended Ground Sensors. And here we are talking of thickly vegetated forests and hilly tracts with plenty of crevices and caves.

 

[Tom M]

If u r right then go back to 1948 when we drag u outside the azad kashmir ...

5 times bigger country is worried so much about us is the summary of how brave we are ...

Well we are afraid of Aedes aegypti, why a bite from them can prove fatal sometimes. But does that make them superior than human beings ??? Well I don't think so. For us and most of the world Pakistan has no value more than that of an Aedes (a spoiler). Nothing else.

 

[Hellfire]

Blood is owed and it shall we reap.

@Nilgiri @Vibrio @padamchen @Joe Shearer

Oh that is a given. But the Govt has boxed itself into a corner over the political ownership of the strikes back in 2016. If it does not respond, it pays a political price and incurs significant costs in the arena of security for the nation. If it responds covertly, it still pays a political cost as public perception will be of no action. If it reacts overtly, it risks a war.

I suspect we may see an overt reaction if at all, well publicized but below the threshold wherein Pakistan will be forced to react, an act that Pakistan can publicly deny. The present weather conditions in Kashmir preclude an ingress to strike at launch pads, and anyways, that will be expected. Perhaps the use of Heron TP finally?

Let us see what comes up.

 

[The Accountant]

Well we are afraid of Aedes aegypti, why a bite from them can prove fatal sometimes. But does that make them superior than human beings ??? Well I don't think so. For us and most of the world Pakistan has no value more than that of an Aedes (a spoiler). Nothing else.

Yes u r the nation who thing that snakes rat and elephants cow and monkey are supperior to you so offcourse a genetically better people cant be important to u ...

By the way u didnt answere to whom u lost azad kashmir ?

If u r right then go back to 1948 when we drag u outside the azad kashmir ...

5 times bigger country is worried so much about us is the summary of how brave we are ...

By the way dont talk about the world as the world super power has recently accepted that Pakistan was right about Afghanistan and India's investment in Afghanistan is going into shit hole ...

So world is with Pakistan and its Indians who were kicked by world in the region ...

 

[Tom M]

Yes u r the nation who thing that snakes rat and elephants cow and monkey are supperior to you so offcourse a genetically better people cant be important to u ...

By the way u didnt answere to whom u lost azad kashmir ?

Superior race ??? LOL, that maybe the reason why an entire nation is taking a nosedive towards the south for the last few decades now.

Oh yeah it was India who invaded Kingdom of Kashmir and Pakistan who liberated a small strip called Azad Kashmir back in 1947-48. LOL

 

[The Accountant]

Superior race ??? LOL, that maybe the reason why an entire nation is taking a nosedive towards the south for the last few decades now.

Oh yeah it was India who invaded Kingdom of Kashmir and Pakistan who liberated a small strip called Azad Kashmir back in 1947-48. LOL

Who has the document of annexation ? Is it Pakistan ? You are not only warshiper of animals but your history is also taught to you by some monkey ... lolz ...

 

[Tom M]

Who has the document of annexation ? Is it Pakistan ? You are not only warshiper of animals but your history is also taught to you by some monkey ... lolz ...

Well the entire world know who had the ambition of land grab, the entire Kingdom of Kashmir back in 1947 and how good it ended up for them. But if you want to claim that as a petty success so be it, as usual Pakistan succeeded we lost. Happy now ???

 

[AUz]

You are right we cant kill a single Pakistani soldier ... your army may be the only Army in the history which denied to take back the dead bodies of their own soldiers in 90's and waited for 10 years to distribute the bravery awards .... you are right ... we dont have capacity or bravery to do that

Lmfaooooo

Literally every single army on planet “denies” the existence of their solder when their fighting covert wars get caught. We accepted our Shaheeds with pride in 65, 71 wars. Kargil was not a full-fledged open conflict. It was covert op high up in the mountains. Ofc we “denied” that we were even involved.

This is standard operation procedure across the globe.

Just stop with this laughable mantra already.

Go mourn your dead soldiers and stop posting dumb things online