One month after IA retreat, more PLA in Doklam than ever before!!!

[Feng Leng]

When i saw india during my last visit there, the people there were jobless. They had no monies.

The government is busy building nuclear missiles to destroy pakistan but no monies for policemen
To protect their women.

This kind of government is worse than north korea or cuba government.

Indians only know how to boast about fighting China and then get butt hurt after spanking. Then they do acid attacks and hang Dalit girls from trees or parade old ladies naked in the village.

 

[BATMAN]

but Mountains only give empty warnings ? even more than 70 times.

What about all those videos on youtube, where Chinese army can be seen literally kicking butts of so called best of Indian soldiers.

 

[Feng Leng]

https://jamestown.org/program/himalayan-impasse-how-china-would-fight-an-indian-border-conflict/

Recent PLA publications emphasize paralysis of the enemy defensive system over destruction. Enhanced capabilities to conduct deep attack via firepower and vertical envelopments improve offensive capabilities and decrease the reliance on costly frontal attacks. Precision strikes are emphasized to support ground operations and increase operational tempo by destroying enemy fortified positions. Ground-based precision artillery and missiles can overcome the loss of aviation fire support caused by weather conditions. The fire plan will include a layered assault and interdiction throughout the enemy’s depth. Artillery and Army Aviation strike forward and shallow depth positions, while longer range rocket, Air Force aviation, and Rocket Force missiles strike in-depth targets. [10]SOF also play a key role providing intelligence, strike guidance and damage assessments, as well as attacking key targets other forces cannot easily strike. Recent PLA publications also stress that restricted terrain can isolate defenders and degrade reconnaissance, allowing the offensive force to employ navigation and positioning systems and terrain masking to surprise, penetrate and encircle enemy positions.

PLA mountain and high altitude combat doctrine provides insight into operations during a potential Sino-Indian border conflict. Forces would be relatively small because of the restricted terrain, and would be limited to troops that routinely train and are acclimated to the special conditions. Joint precision strikes would constitute an important component of the operation to overcome the complex terrain, destroy the cohesion of the enemy’s in-depth defensive system, and support and increase the operational tempo of ground force combat. Insertions of airmobile and special operations forces into the enemy rear area would support frontal ground force combat, seize or destroy key targets, support the joint fire strike, and interdict enemy forces. Ground-based precision strikes could compensate for reduced aviation support. Information attacks, electronic and psychological warfare would be important components in achieving information superiority critical for a successful operation.

 

[ito]

Why are Chinese still cannot come out of Doklam? It is ok, you lost...take that into your stride.

 

[Feng Leng]

Why are Chinese still cannot come out of Doklam? It is ok, you lost...take that into your stride.

LOL at the Indian going bonkers with humiliation and spewing gibberish in PDF post!

 

[ito]

LOL at the Indian going bonkers with humiliation and spewing gibberish in PDF post!

Feng Leng, I guess you need calm down old man...you are reaching near 40. Might get a heart attack.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Why are Chinese still cannot come out of Doklam? It is ok, you lost...take that into your stride.

Read the article, we never left Donglang. In fact we are setting up permanent garrisons there.

Only India left Donglang. It was a unilateral retreat from India, despite their promise to protect Bhutan's territory.

It was a net increase in China's territory yet again.

 

[ito]

Read the article, we never left Donglang. In fact we are setting up permanent garrisons there.

Only India left Donglang. It was a unilateral retreat from India, despite their promise to protect Bhutan's territory.

It was a net increase in China's territory yet again.

Chinese used to patrolled Doklam intermittently. India never had problems with that. Anyway, India too can patrol in Doklam on behalf of Bhutan, if invited, after all we are guarding Bhutanese borders. What India has problem is investing in infrastructure in that area that can be used by Chinese military.

Anyway the signals coming from Chinese government are conciliatory. It seem they want improved relations with India

China Seeks New Chapter With 'Largest Trading Partner' India
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/china-seeks-new-chapter-with-largest-trading-partner-india-1757165

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Chinese used to patrolled Doklam intermittently.

"Used to" = Past tense.

Read the article, permanent garrisons, permanent troop presence, permanent white buildings:

Each of the three Chinese incursion camps in western Bhutan are meant to house a platoon-sized formation of around 30 soldiers (see graphic) and include infrastructure and tents, permanent white buildings with green roofs and communication trenches which allow soldiers to move between positions when under fire. "The Chinese are here to stay in western Bhutan," an army official says.

India has essentially handed over Bhutan's territory to China.

India has abandoned their promise (mutual defense treaty) to protect Bhutan's territory.

 

[ito]

"Used to" = Past tense.

Read the article, permanent garrisons, permanent troop presence, permanent white buildings:



India has essentially handed over Bhutan's territory to China.

India has abandoned their promise (mutual defense treaty) to protect Bhutan's territory.

I seldom believe in such articles. Now a days there is more media speculations than facts, and are written by fanboys. I would believe if it either come from the Chinese government or the Indian government. As on India - Bhutan treaty, it stood for 70 years, I don't see why it wouldn't stand in future unless Bhutan wants to go the other way.

 

[Feng Leng]

I seldom believe in such articles. Now a days there is more media speculations than facts, and are written by fanboys. I would believe if it either come from the Chinese government or the Indian government. As on India - Bhutan treaty, it stood for 70 years, I don't see why it wouldn't stand in future unless Bhutan wants to go the other way.

LOL at the Indian going bonkers from humiliation! He can only delude himself silly by claiming even Indian media is Chinese propaganda when they tell him Chinese have fortified Doklam as never before! He will live in his own imaginary world with open air shupa powa!

 

[deep.ocean]

China first need to nuke its PLA then talk about nuking India. Pussy Liberation Army need to grow pair of balls..

 

[faithfulguy]

Read the article, we never left Donglang. In fact we are setting up permanent garrisons there.

Only India left Donglang. It was a unilateral retreat from India, despite their promise to protect Bhutan's territory.

It was a net increase in China's territory yet again.

Yes, and China will now ensure that Indian troops won't cross the border even if China restart road construction. India tipped its hand too early and did not get enough promises when its troops retreated. So now, the initiative is in the Chinese side and it look like India could do nothing short of a war.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

China first need to nuke its PLA then talk about nuking India. Pussy Liberation Army need to grow pair of balls..

So China has no balls, then how come Aksai Chin and Donglang are now under Chinese control?

Thanks for the extra territory, yet again.

 

[faithfulguy]

So China has no balls, then how come Aksai Chin and Donglang are now under Chinese control?

Thanks for the extra territory, yet again.

India are experts of silver lining victories. Such as brag about delaying of road construction even when their troops retreated with tails between their legs.