What's new

One Belt, One Road not international venture: India

Hindustani78

BANNED
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
40,471
Reaction score
-47
Country
India
Location
India
One Belt, One Road not international venture: India
New Delhi: July 21, 2015, DHNS:
490656_thump.gif

India has hardened its position on the One Belt One Road (OBOR) initiative of China, calling it a national initiative of the communist country and not an international venture.

New Delhi made it clear that it viewed OBOR initiative distinctly from the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, which was also conceived by Beijing, but was being set up by over 50 nations collectively.

Foreign Secretary S Jaishankar made it clear that New Delhi viewed OBOR as the one designed by Beijing in pursuit of its own strategic objectives, but not as an inclusive one in which opinions of other “interested or affected” countries had not been taken into account.

“Where we are concerned, this (OBOR) is a national Chinese initiative,” Jaishankar said in Singapore on Monday. He was replying to questions after delivering a lecture at the International Institute of Strategic Studies.

“The Chinese devised it, created a blueprint (for it). It was not an international initiative they discussed with the whole world, or with the countries which in someway or the other have opinions (about it) or which are affected by it,” he said.

Chinese President Xi Jinping has since 2013 been articulating the idea of a “21st century Maritime Silk Road” reviving economic connectivity between the Pacific and Indian Oceans and linking China’s coastline with Southeast Asia, the Gulf and the eastern coast of Africa. He has also been proposing a “Silk Road Economic Belt” reviving the ancient link between China and Mediterranean through central Asia.

The two projects are now together called OBOR initiative and China has been pulling all stops over the past year to elicit support from other countries.

Beijing’s new plan to spread its tentacles further in the Indian Ocean region and Central Asia, however, caused unease in New Delhi, which has already been wary of China’s strategic assets encircling India.

“If this (OBOR) is something on which they want a larger buy in, then they need to have larger discussions, and those have not happened,” he said, apparently indicating that Beijing had not taken New Delhi into confidence before launching the mega plan.

He also pointed out that the OBOR and the AIIB were different in nature. “We had no reservation about joining the AIIB,” he said, adding that India’s decision to join the AIIB was based on “a very sensible calculation” that the bank would provide a new source of financing.
 
.
http://www.thehindu.com/news/nation...rprise-academic/article9342373.ece?ref=tpnews

The China sponsored ‘One Belt One Road’(OBOR) project has caught India by surprise, said Srikanth Kondappally, Professor of Chinese Studies, JNU.

Delivering the valedictory address at the conference on ‘India, China and the new Silk Road Initiatives’ organised by the Mahatma Gandhi University, Prof. Kondappally said while the proposed global scale of the projects connecting Europe, Asia and Africa could provide an opportunity for expanding trade and investments it also challenged the national security of the country as the projects are passing through the India-claimed Kashmir regions currently held by Pakistan.

upload_2016-11-14_20-19-12.png

OBOR projects, if pursued vigorously are expected to connect the ‘heartland’ with the ‘rim land through continental and maritime routes and thus at one stroke make the rising China indispensable in the calculations of any country in the region, he said.

For India, regional and global leadership issues are also a consideration in the OBOR initiative. On the other hand, India also has its own initiative of Project Mausam of reviving commercial and cultural linkages with the Indian Ocean region and beyond, he noted.

Kandaswami Subramanian from Chennai Centre for China Studies, said that the global economic crisis leading to the collapse of exports has fuelled the rebalancing in China.

The earlier economic model had created excess capacity in major sectors like steel, transport, cement, metals. These excess capacities coupled with the management capability of Chinese public and private firms beg for opportunities abroad. These arrangements also seek to challenge the U.S. hegemony and the threat posed through its ‘Pivot Asia’ and TPP negotiations to dislodge China.

Another dimension of the OBOR may be related to China’s ‘going out’ policy, i.e. outward investment, beginning with the turn of this century.

M.J. Vinod, Professor, University of Bangalore, cautioned that while the Maritime Silk Road (MSR) is exclusively economic in orientation, yet it could still have strategic implications for India.

Though India cannot ignore the new Asian order that is fast emerging, the onus also lies on China in assuaging India’s concerns pertaining to the MSR.

K.B. Usha of the Centre for Russian and Central Asian Studies, JNU, pointed out that Chinese logistical initiative has expanded after the Ukraine crisis sharing the vision of Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).

Russia-China strategic partnership is thus growing, she said. Raju A. Thadikkaran, former director, ICCS, chaired the valedictory session.

‘It will connect the ‘heartland’ with the ‘rim land through continental and maritime routes.’
 
.
Last Updated: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - 18:57
http://zeenews.india.com/news/world...egotiation-with-pakistan-on-cpec_1954527.html

Moscow: The Russian foreign ministry has denied Pakistani media reports about it having `secret negotiations` with Pakistan for the creation of the China-Pakistan economic corridor (CPEC).

A statement issued by Russia`s Foreign Affairs Ministry said Moscow is not discussing the possibility of joining this project with Islamabad.

"Russia-Pakistan trade and economic cooperation has its own inherent value, and we intend to strengthen it. Russian companies are implementing business projects in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, including the planned construction of the North-South gas pipeline from Karachi to Lahore, on a bilateral basis," the statement said.

The proposed CPEC is about 3,000-kilometre long and will consist of highways, railways and pipelines that will connect China`s Xinjiang province to the rest of the world through the Gwadar port in Pakistan.

Considered to be a part of China`s One Belt, One Road initiative, the USD 46 billion project covers Balochistan and Sindh provinces and Azad Kashmir

ANI

First Published: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - 18:56
 
. .
Can you people stop being butthurt for once? This is a project that greatly benefits the entirety of Eurasia, and to some extent the world as a whole, yet all you people do is just complain and complain. :flame:
 
.
U.K., France, Russia Want To Join Pakistan-China’s CPEC
By Polina Tikhonova on November 28, 2016 4:10 pm

The CPEC is apparently becoming a new association (like BRICS), as many countries are showing interest in being part of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. With ambitions to even become a new union (like European Union, but not limited only to Europe), the CPEC, co-created by Pakistan and China, has already attracted big international players such as Russia, the U.K. and France.
China-Pakistan-CPEC.jpg

The $51 billion project has been all over the news lately, not only because it’s a game-changer for China, Pakistan and Asia as a whole, but also because there’s a theory that India could start a military conflict over the CPEC. But seeing how many nations are siding with the CPEC, it’s very unlikely that India would start a war over it.

Interestingly, Russia’s bid to join the CPEC comes as a yet another indication that Moscow, which has been India’s key weapons supplier for decades, is abandoning India for Pakistan. It seems that Russia has more chances than any other country to join the CPEC, as theories about a possible China-Russia-Pakistan superpower triangle keep piling up. The CPEC may be that formal launchpad to form an alliance between Beijing, Moscow and Islamabad.

CPEC is foundation for China-Russia-Pakistan superpower triangle
But what’s all the fuss about? Is the CPEC really becoming the new BRICS? It could be so.

Just days ago, Russia and Pakistan reportedly held backdoor meetings which led Moscow to formally request access to Gwadar Port and ask China and Pakistan to be part of the lucrative multi-billion-dollar project. According to sources cited by Pakistan’s Daily Times, the chief of Russia’s intelligence agency, Federal Security Services, made a secret visit to Pakistan.

Russian intelligence officials and Pakistani high officials reportedly discussed strengthening their bilateral defense and military ties. The two nations also reportedly expressed interest in reshaping the cooperation between their intelligence agencies. The Russian intelligence chief was also said to have visited Gwadar, which is a key point of the CPEC, a 3,000-kilometer network of roads, railways and pipelines that connects Kashgar and Gwadar.

Russian officials were also reportedly satisfied with the economic opportunities offered by the CPEC and, according to the media outlet’s sources, even expressed interest in using Gwadar Port for international trade. The Russians were also said to have pledged to make investments in various sectors of Pakistan to deepen their economic ties.

Is CPEC the end of India and Russia’s friendship?
Although Russia and Pakistan were Cold War-era rivals, the two have greatly amended their relations in the last two years. Their new friendship, which has been backed by military deals and joint military exercises, is attributed to the fact that with the help of Islamabad, Russia wants to get closer to China, which is Pakistan’s traditional ally.

India, Pakistan’s traditional and historical enemy, can’t be happy about Russia’s warm ties with Islamabad of late. Russia is well aware that India is a strong opponent of the CPEC, and joining the project would probably mark the formal end of their friendly ties.

India has several problems with the CPEC and has already made several documented attempts to sabotage the project. But one of the biggest problems it has with the multi-billion-dollar China-Pakistan project is that it passes through the disputed Kashmir region. Both Islamabad and New Delhi claim Kashmir as their own territory and have already waged three wars over it. Tensions in the region were recently reignited after 19 Indian soldiers were, according to the Indian government, killed by Pakistan-based militants.

Joining the CPEC would mean Russia is serious about its intentions to turn away from India, which could eventually lead to forming a formal or informal alliance with Pakistan and China.

Is the CPEC the new EU for the U.K. after Brexit?
While Pakistan and China have yet to look into Russia’s request to join the CPEC, Vladimir Putin’s country is not the only nation that wants to join the lucrative project. The United Kingdom, Turkey and France have also been pretty assertive and vocal about their intentions to join the Pak-Chinese Corridor. Officials from other European countries are also reportedly in negotiations with Pakistani and Chinese officials to start projects regarding the CPEC.

But the most promising addition to the China-Pakistan project is probably the United Kingdom, which is currently in the long process of leaving the European Union. After Britons voted in favor of Brexit this past summer, the U.K. sees the need to bring its investments into non-EU projects, and the CPEC could become this very platform for investments.

U.K. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Boris Johnson echoed his country’s interest in the CPEC during his most recent visit to Pakistan last Friday. Johnson even called the CPEC “a wonder project” and expressed his desire for U.K. companies to participate in various projects of it.

“I am very excited about the CPEC idea. And I would like UK firms to participate in the construction of this fabulous venture,” Johnson said while addressing the students and faculty of the Government College University in Lahore. “But this should be part of an even more ambitious vision that would revive the ancient Silk route and see the rebirth of trading caravans connecting East and West.”

Boris Johnson invites U.K. investors to Pakistan
Johnson also said that Karachi should be Asia’s “biggest trading entrepot” alongside Singapore and Shanghai. The British Secretary of State also pledged that his country will “play a part” in helping Pakistan achieve closer economic integration.

He praised Islamabad for making a huge progress in recent years, noting that national security in Pakistan has improved while democracy has been strengthened. Those are the two key points to attracting investors, as they serve as an indication of stability in the country. So his words may be interpreted as a direct invitation to British firms to invest in various sectors of Pakistan and become part of the CPEC.

“My message to you all is that Britain wants to be with you to make this journey. I believe that bilateral trade between our two countries – just £2.7 billion – is not enough given our closeness,” Johnson also said.

France keen on joining the CPEC
Investments from such major European countries as the U.K. could give a huge boost to the CPEC. In fact, many other European countries such as Germany, Italy, Spain and others could follow suit to also get a piece of the lucrative CPEC-pie.

France already seems to be onboard. Earlier this month, Jean Marc Fenet, head of the Embassy of France’s Regional Economic Department for India and South Asia, expressed his country’s interest in becoming part of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Addressing the business community at the Islamabad Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ICCI), Fenet said France views Pakistan as a huge and prosperous market for business.

Fenet added that his country is keen to further strengthen bilateral trade and economic relations between the two nations. Praising the CPEC for creating many business and investment opportunities, Fenet said that France is taking a huge interest in the South Asia country. In a message that was backed by the French Embassy’s Head of Economic Department, Philippe Fouet, Fenet also said that his country has what Pakistan needs to boost its economy – the advanced technology and expertise.

CPEC is China and Pakistan’s trump card
Pakistan seems to be open to welcoming
others to become part of the CPEC. Last Wednesday, Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif said his country would be happy to see any country join the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Sharif made the comments during his bilateral meeting with Turkmenistan President Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov, which suggests that Islamabad is also inviting Turkmenistan to become part of the project.

Sharif praised the CPEC for being a project that brings prosperity to Pakistan, adding that the future of the people of Asia is directly linked to the project. Earlier this month, Sharif invited Turkey to invest in the project. During a Pakistan-Turkey roundtable with Turkey President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Sharif said Turkish investors should benefit from the CPEC.

If Turkish investors invest in the project, it would help strengthen economic ties between the two nations. Sharif’s pledges to boost bilateral ties between Ankara and Islamabad also gave birth to theories about a possible China-Russia-Pakistan-Turkey rectangle. While China and Turkey enjoy warm economic ties, Moscow and Ankara have also been strengthening their ties lately.

As the possibility of triangles or rectangles between nations remains vague, the CPEC may serve as a clear indication of which countries are ready to formally side with Pakistan and China.
http://www.valuewalk.com/2016/11/uk-france-russia-join-pakistan-china-cpec/
 
. . . .
Hi, pal, you have been an Indian all your life, and have been here for good 6 years now, but you have not learnt a thing about the difference between China and India.

In China, when they say they "will", it means it "will be done" on time;
In India, when you guys say you "will", it basically means you "will be talking about it" over and over again in the future.

Get it?

Indians can condemn OBOR all they want- OBOR will just bypass the whole of Bharata
Typical big mouth future tense Middle Kingdom boasting spotted.:china:

Act first and then do a big mouth boasting
 
Last edited:
.
Typical big mouth future tense Middle Kingdom boasting spotted.:china:

Act first and then do a big mouth boasting


Hi, pal, you have been an Indian all your life, and have been here for good 6 years now, but you have not learnt a thing about the difference between China and India.

In China, when they say they "will", it means it "will be done" on time;
In India, when you guys say you "will", it basically means you "will be talking about it" over and over again in the future.

Get it?
 
. . . . .
Back
Top Bottom