rajk20002002
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2009
- Messages
- 263
- Reaction score
- 0
Aid is not paid back AFAIK - that is why it is called 'aid' and not an 'interest free loan'.
That means Aid and Zakait are same ?
RK
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Aid is not paid back AFAIK - that is why it is called 'aid' and not an 'interest free loan'.
Aid is not paid back AFAIK - that is why it is called 'aid' and not an 'interest free loan'.
I did get a strong response from the members, but all I did is highlight what the conclusion of the article was saying, never the less, the shift of US aid has shifted. The Aid that was coming to Pakistan, if you remember was Military previously, know it has become a non-military aid. The sole purpose is that United States feels that if given military aid that would be used for other purpose and not for the main cause.
Aid is money that requires not to be paid back that is correct, but the purpose of this Aid is more of a motivational value of fighting the terrorist in the country more so then actually required badly.
Aid is a soft-loan that may be written off or become a grant.Aid is not paid back AFAIK - that is why it is called 'aid' and not an 'interest free loan'.
There's no evidence, just allegations by NYT about the funds being diverted.
True, there's no evidence of GoP diverting non-military aid towards defence procurement.
But Obama is convinced Musharraf diverted military aid to prepare for war against India, as the below Fox interview (pre-election) shows. Watch the snippet at 6:20 onwards.
3x7Byjkr4us[/media] - Obama says Pakistan used U.S. aid to prepare for war against India
I can only assume any aid from the Obama administration will come with a lot of strings attached.