- it has done more damage to herself and her ideals than AQ could have ever dreamed of.
Post of the day
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- it has done more damage to herself and her ideals than AQ could have ever dreamed of.
Yea but we qualify that by saying maybe or we think. You on the other hand are telling us I quote:
FYI, he is getting re-elected in November.
Don't tell me we haven't tried it.
Pakistan has constantly asked US for Predator Drones control, US rejected it.
Pakistan has constantly asked advanced weapons and technology share, US rejected it.
Pakistan has repeatedly asked US to attack most wanted terrorists hidding in Afghanistan, US rejected it.
Pakistan has request US to stop killing innocent people by many sucide bombers from Af'tan, US ignored it.
.
Obama is a sorry excuse of a human being. That is all I have to say.....
So if they are Pakistani drones they would automatically only hit militants while american drones only hit civilians.
Advanced weaponry what are f16's chopped liver
What suicide bombers coming from afghanistan? Perhaps worry about the ones from Pakistan before imagining others from some where else.
A definition that if your riding in the back of Ayman al-Zawahiri's pick up your probably a terrorist sounds like a resonable assumption
It wasn't just Pakistanis, all Muslims were prancing about and getting high off the fact Obama became president.I recall the attitude of Pakistani media when Obama was elected - they were ecstatic and could not stop repeating "Barack HUSSAIN Obama" - as if some Muslim was now President of the US and it marked the beginning of a new kind of relationship between US and Muslim majority countries --
Provide proof of which member said "IK will be the next president or will in the election" otherwise shut upAre you sure everyone does that? It is understood here.
Love how you put in the word Muslim there.Asim, this is a fairly good read and came out in NY Times just yesterday. The article is 8 pages long and I didn't have a way to copy paste it here - http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1
The gist is on how Obama takes a personal interest on filtering and authorizing the "kill-list". The reporter of course paints a picture of him taking a personal interest and personal responsibility for all the actions. Ironically, Bush was more restrained and responsible in his use of drones, and as far as the Afghan war was concerned, you can't really blame him for anything. Yet his image in the Muslim world is worse than that of Obama.
It wasn't just Pakistanis, all Muslims were prancing about and getting high off the fact Obama became president.
Provide proof of which member said "IK will be the next president or will in the election" otherwise shut up
you're saying Obama's going to win as if you're some fortune teller
We predict IK will win, nobody here even said IK IS going to win - there is a clear difference. Anything can happen during a election and the decisions are within the hands of Pakistani voters.
Now go do one and stop trying to compare a leader like IK to Obama.
Love how you put in the word Muslim there.
Bush was and is hated by everyone, including millions of Americans.
What more can you can expect from a Primitive Ape?Obama is a sorry excuse of a human being. That is all I have to say.....
Gotta charge up the batteries for later.so much charged up for nothing.
What more can you can expect from a Primitive Ape?
.
Come on now, that's not the real you - no need for that kind of thing
That is an invalid argument, which has been debunked several times - while Pakistan has argued a lack of resources for not launching an operation in NW (a legitimate argument, since the costs of such an operation would not be limited to the deployment of tens of thousands of more troops and associated equipment and logistical costs, but also the associated costs from increased militant and terrorist attacks against targets across Pakistan, as well as the costs to relocate, house and later resettle hundreds of thousands of refugees), Pakistan has also, at the minimum, proposed alternatives to unilateral US Drone Strikes like joint drone strikes, Pakistan operated drone strikes and PAF strikes, based on shared US-Pak intel.
It's horrifying knowing that you support the killings of innocents as well.Drone strikes have devastated Al Qaeda and their cohorts.
I totally support these strikes in killing terrorists.