What's new

NYT: Uighurs in China Say Bias Is Growing.

Assault Rifle

BANNED
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
1,056
Reaction score
-2
Country
India
Location
India
Uighurs in China Say Bias Is Growing.
Gilles Sabrie for The New York Times
By ANDREW JACOBS
Published: October 7, 2013

KASHGAR, China — Job seekers looking for opportunities in this ancient oasis town in China’s far western Xinjiang region would seem to have ample options, based on a quick glance at a local help-wanted Web site. The Kashgar Cultural Center has an opening for an experienced dance choreographer, the prefectural Communist Party office is hiring a driver and nearby Shule County needs an archivist.

But these and dozens of other job openings share one caveat: ethnic Uighurs, the Muslim, Turkic-speaking people who make up nearly 90 percent of Kashgar’s population, need not apply. Roughly half of the 161 positions advertised on the Civil Servant Examination Information Web site indicate that only ethnic Han Chinese or native Mandarin speakers will be considered.

Such discrimination, common across the region, is one of the many indignities China’s 10 million Uighurs face in a society that increasingly casts them as untrustworthy and prone to religious extremism. Uighurs are largely frozen out of the region’s booming gas and oil industry, airport jobs are mostly reserved for Han applicants, and truck drivers whose national identity cards list their ethnicity as Uighur cannot obtain the licenses required to haul fuel, an unwritten rule based on the fear that oil and gas tankers could easily be turned into weapons, according to several trucking companies.

Despite its name — the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region — this strategically pivotal expanse of desert and snow-draped mountains that borders several Central Asian nations is tightly controlled by Beijing. Top government positions as well as critical spots in the sprawling security apparatus are dominated by Han Chinese, many of them recruited from the eastern half of the country.

“The bottom line is that the Chinese don’t trust us, and that is having a corrosive impact on life in Xinjiang,” said Ilham Tohti, a prominent Uighur economist in Beijing. “And the way things are going, it’s going to get worse.”

After a summer of violence that claimed at least 100 lives, analysts, human rights advocates and even a handful of Chinese academics are raising alarms over what they call repressive policies that are fueling increased alienation and radicalization among Uighurs, many of whom subscribe to a moderate brand of Sunni Islam. These policies have been tightened since ethnic rioting four years ago left at least 200 people dead in Urumqi, the regional capital.

The Chinese government blames outside agitators, among them members of a separatist movement it contends has links to global jihadists, for much of the unrest. While there have been a number of unprovoked attacks on Chinese police officers or soldiers in recent years, most experts say the threat from Islamic militants is far less potent and organized than that portrayed by Beijing.

In August, paramilitary police officers not far from Kashgar shot at least 32 men, killing a dozen, during a raid on what was described as a secret “munitions center”; a few days later at least a dozen other Uighurs were killed as they prayed at a farmhouse in Yilkiqi township, according to Radio Free Asia. The authorities said the men were taking part in “illegal religious activities” and training for a terrorist attack, but did not provide further details.

Other episodes include a shooting outside a police station in Aksu Prefecture that wounded 50 and left three dead, and a violent skirmish in Hotan, another Silk Road outpost, during which dozens of men were reportedly shot while protesting the detention of a local imam. The Chinese state news media described these and other episodes as “terror attacks”; exile groups say they were peaceful demonstrations crushed with brute force.

Local residents say these and other clashes have been fueled by the dispiriting realities of daily life here: the institutionalized job discrimination, the restrictions that prohibit those under 18 from entering mosques and the difficulty that many Uighurs face in obtaining passports. Those Uighurs lucky enough to travel abroad say they are often interrogated upon their return by security officials who demand to know whether they have engaged in separatist activities.

“The government should realize that reckless and inappropriate decisions by local authorities are only causing more instability,” said Yang Shu, a professor of Central Asian studies at Lanzhou University, referring to rules that discourage women from wearing head scarves and young men from growing beards.
Enlarge This Image

Gilles Sabrie for The New York Times
At a tailor’s shop in the old city section of Kashgar, mannequins’ eyes are covered by paper, in deference to Islamic strictures on representing women.
World Twitter Logo.
Connect With Us on Twitter
Follow @nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines.
Twitter List: Reporters and Editors
Enlarge This Image

Gilles Sabrie for The New York Times
Uighur women at a Sunday bazaar in Kashgar, China. Amid rapid development, Muslims have held on to their traditions.
Many Uighurs are also convinced that Beijing is seeking to wipe out their language and culture through assimilation and education policies that favor Mandarin over Uighur in schools and government jobs. Since 2004, a so-called bilingual education initiative has required teachers in much of the region to use Mandarin for nearly every subject. The authorities insist that the policy is aimed at helping Uighurs compete in a country where Mandarin is the lingua franca, but many parents, teachers and Uighur intellectuals are unconvinced.

“My 17-year-old daughter speaks decent Chinese, but she cannot get through a piece of Uighur literature,” said a government employee in Urumqi, who asked to remain anonymous because such criticism can have serious consequences. “A generation from now, I fear our people will be functionally illiterate in Uighur.”

Fear and mistrust between the two ethnicities has hardened in recent years as a growing number of Han Chinese migrants settle into heavily guarded enclaves, especially in the southern crescent of Xinjiang that remains predominantly Uighur. Even in Urumqi, where ethnic Han Chinese make up 75 percent of the population, knots of heavily armed police officers in fatigues are positioned throughout Uighur neighborhoods; after dark, Uighur men are barred from the front seats of taxis, according to a local ordinance cast as an anticrime measure.

Huang Xiaolin, a Han engineer who was recently lured to Hotan from coastal Shandong Province with a generous salary and subsidized housing, said colleagues frequently warned him against entering the city’s Uighur quarter. “The local people here are uncivilized and prone to violence,” he said, standing near a propaganda banner that read, “The Han and the Uighur cannot live without one another.”

Beijing has coupled its “strike hard” security approach with turbocharged economic development, but even that has stoked resentment among Uighurs, who say the best jobs go to newly arrived Han. “The Chinese government is focused on a very outdated understanding of macroeconomic development, thinking that it will bring everyone up to the same level, but it’s clearly not working,” said Sean R. Roberts, a professor at George Washington University who studies development in the region.

Part of the backlash, experts and local residents say, has been prompted by increasingly intrusive restrictions on religion. Civil servants can be fired for joining Friday afternoon prayer services, and Uighur college students say they are often required to eat lunch in school cafeterias during the holy month of Ramadan, when observant Muslims fast. In cities across the region, signs warn people against public prayer, and video cameras are pointed at the doorways of local mosques. Residents also say the government maintains an extensive web of paid informers and monitors Internet traffic and cellphone conversations.

Such policies are born out of concern that the radical Islam that has destabilized neighboring Afghanistan and Pakistan will take root in Xinjiang, a fear not entirely unfounded given the region’s proximity to lawless countries that have provided a haven for a kaleidoscope of jihadists from across the Muslim world, including some Uighurs.

But experts say the raids on unsanctioned religious schools and other restrictions have prompted even greater religiosity. “Five years ago, you would have been shocked to see a veiled woman in Urumqi, but not anymore,” said a Han academic at Xinjiang University who is critical of Beijing’s policies in the region. “For a lot of Uighurs, growing a beard and asking your wife to cover her head in public has become an act of defiance.”

Despite the growing death toll, analysts say China’s new leadership is unlikely to reconsider its hard-line policies any time soon. During a state visit to four Central Asia nations last month that sought to bolster Xinjiang’s role as the linchpin of a revitalized Silk Road, President Xi Jinping vowed to continue the battle against what he described as the “three forces” of separatism, terrorism and religious extremism, according to the official Xinhua news agency.

By failing to consider the root causes of Uighur discontent, Beijing could unwittingly radicalize a generation of young people, said Nicholas Bequelin, a researcher for Human Rights Watch who is based in Hong Kong. “The entire Uighur ethnicity feels asphyxiated, having become suspect as sympathetic to extremism,” he said. “Xinjiang is trapped in a vicious circle of increased repression that only leads to more violence.”

Shi Da contributed research.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/08/world/asia/uighurs-in-china-say-bias-is-growing.html?pagewanted=2
 
This is a classic case of one minority group who thinks their culture is more important than the vast majority.

These Uighurs need to understand one thing, get with the program and assimilate with the mainstream. You don't often hear a Mexican teacher in California demanding Spanish to be lingua franca in school. Same situation applies to China. You want to learn your minority language? Go to a minority school and take up elective lesson offered by the national schools if there are any. Now you understand why American wants to wipe off the minorities in America. They are such a hindrance to any development and headache.
 
This is a classic case of one minority group who thinks their culture is more important than the vast majority.

These Uighurs need to understand one thing, get with the program and assimilate with the mainstream. You don't often hear a Mexican teacher in California demanding Spanish to be lingua franca in school. Same situation applies to China. You want to learn your minority language? Go to a minority school and take up elective lesson offered by the national schools if there are any. Now you understand why American wants to wipe off the minorities in America. They are such a hindrance to any development and headache.

Remember this when you rant about indian minorities.
 
Remember this when you rant about indian minorities.
Why did I ever rant about Indian minorities? I will never criticize a country to think "big" for the majority and ignore pesky minority who think they are more important than the big scheme. My principle has always been to support the mainstream and get rid of pesky minorities who don't get with the program.
 
Why did I ever rant about Indian minorities? I will never criticize a country to think "big" for the majority and ignore pesky minority who think they are more important than the big scheme. My principle has always been to support the mainstream and get rid of pesky minorities who don't get with the program.

I like your attitude man. :tup:
 
The Uighurs are the invaders who settled on Chinese land. Only in China can minorities massacre the majority like in the riots where hundreds of Han Chinese were killed. Han Chinese are too peaceful and only care for business and education.

This is all the fault of Confucius.

It's his rubbish that made us so timid and peaceful. Only after communists took power did we become more ruthless. We must become ruthless. Being nice is for losers.
 
Hmm, I looked up the civil servant examination requirements for Xianjiang region, here is the link from Xianjing public servant website:
2013???????7760?????? - ??????????

There are total 7760 positions offered:

The requirements are:
1.具有中华人民共和国国籍;
1. Have Chinese Citizenship

2.年满18周岁及以上,35周岁及以下(即:1977年5月20日至1995年5月20日期间出生,具体年龄要求详见《2013年新疆维吾尔自治区面向社会公开考试录用公务员、工作人员职位表》);
Age above 18 and below 35 (born between May 20th, 1977 and May 20th, 1995, for the specific age requirement for each post, please see <<2013 Xianjing Uyghur Autonomous Region Open Exam for Civil Servant Positions>> 2013)
3.&#25317;&#25252;&#20013;&#21326;&#20154;&#27665;&#20849;&#21644;&#22269;&#23466;&#27861;&#65292;&#32500;&#25252;&#31062;&#22269;&#32479;&#19968;&#65292;&#21453;&#23545;&#27665;&#26063;&#20998;&#35010;&#21644;&#38750;&#27861;&#23447;&#25945;&#27963;&#21160;&#65307;
Protect the Chinese constitution, maintain unity of the nation, working against ethnic conflict and cultist activities.

4.&#20855;&#26377;&#33391;&#22909;&#30340;&#21697;&#34892;&#65307;
Be of high moral standard and behavior.

5.&#20855;&#26377;&#27491;&#24120;&#23653;&#34892;&#25253;&#32771;&#32844;&#20301;&#32844;&#36131;&#30340;&#36523;&#20307;&#26465;&#20214;&#65307;
Meet the physical requirements for the posts

6.&#20855;&#26377;&#31526;&#21512;&#25253;&#32771;&#32844;&#20301;&#35201;&#27714;&#30340;&#25991;&#21270;&#31243;&#24230;&#65292;&#39035;&#25345;&#26377;&#32463;&#22269;&#23478;&#65292;&#30465;&#65288;&#24066;&#65289;&#12289;&#33258;&#27835;&#21306;&#12289;&#26032;&#30086;&#29983;&#20135;&#24314;&#35774;&#20853;&#22242;&#25945;&#32946;&#20027;&#31649;&#37096;&#38376;&#25110;&#24178;&#37096;&#25945;&#32946;&#39046;&#23548;&#23567;&#32452;&#35748;&#21487;&#30340;&#27605;&#19994;&#35777;&#20070;&#65307;
Meet the education requirements for the posts, must have certificates from the appropriate provincial departments.

7.&#20855;&#26377;&#31526;&#21512;&#25253;&#32771;&#32844;&#20301;&#30340;&#20854;&#20182;&#20840;&#37096;&#26465;&#20214;&#12290;
Meets the other requirements of the posts
I looked up the <<2013 Xianjing Uyghur Autonomous Region Open Exam for Civil Servant Positions>>
2013
There isn't a single position that says it is Han Chinese only. The only requirements regarding ethnicity is that some posts are reserved for minority group only.
The closest thing will be this requirement
&#31508;&#35797;&#20351;&#29992;&#32500;&#21566;&#23572;&#35821;&#31572;&#39064;&#30340;&#32771;&#29983;&#65292;&#38656;&#20855;&#26377;&#20013;&#22269;&#27721;&#35821;&#27700;&#24179;&#31561;&#32423;&#32771;&#35797;HSK8&#32423;&#25110;&#20013;&#22269;&#23569;&#25968;&#27665;&#26063;&#27721;&#35821;&#27700;&#24179;&#31561;&#32423;&#32771;&#35797;&#65288;MHK&#65289;&#19977;&#32423;&#30002;&#31561;&#20197;&#19978;&#30340;&#35777;&#20070;
"For individuals who answer the questions in Uyghur language, they must have Mandarin Proficiency Certificate HSK level 8 or Chinese Ethnic Group Mandarin Proficiency Certificate 3A or above"
Basically, this is equivalent to US or UK civil servant position that require you to speak English or French posts that require you to speak French, so on and so forth.

The author made a gross misrepresentation, especially by using sentence like "only ethnic Han Chinese or native Mandarin speakers will be considered".
 
This is all the fault of Confucius.

It's his rubbish that made us so timid and peaceful. Only after communists took power did we become more ruthless. We must become ruthless. Being nice is for losers.

Huh? Do you know it's your dear communism that created Uigur minority? Before 1949, there was no such minority called Uigur. The stupid CCP learned from Soviet Union and create Uigur to include all the people in Xinjinag with similar languages, etc. Then they even encouraged those minorities to receive education in minority languages. WTF! How do you expect those people get jobs etc if they go out of their towns, villages? Good thing they now reversed this policy and encourage them to go to bi lingual schools.

Today's ethnic problems in China are purely the CCP's own fault with short-sighted policies that were created to woo the people to support their revolutionary cause but ignored more important national interest in long term. This also applies to the CCP's policies towards our overseas Chinese compatriots, esp. SE Asia.
 
Huh? Do you know it's your dear communism that created Uigur minority? Before 1949, there was no such minority called Uigur. The stupid CCP learned from Soviet Union and create Uigur to include all the people in Xinjinag with similar languages, etc. Then they even encouraged those minorities to receive education in minority languages. WTF! How do you expect those people get jobs etc if they go out of their towns, villages? Good thing they now reversed this policy and encourage them to go to bi lingual schools.

Today's ethnic problems in China are purely the CCP's own fault with short-sighted policies that were created to woo the people to support their revolutionary cause but ignored more important national interest in long term.

If those KMT losers were in charge of China, they would have given away Tibet, Xinjiang and Diaoyu islands to the enemy. It's the KMT fascists that gave away Outer Mongolia.

KMT was a western puppet and allowed Japan to invade China. It took the CPC to crush the Japanese and gain independence. Without the CPC, China would probably be another vassal state of the west like Japan and India.

Sure, the CPC has its faults but they are the only people that has the ruthless attitude that's needed for a modern China. Confucius and KMT are outdated garbage.

All the success that China is having now is solely due to the CPC.
 
The two articles represent different aspects of a problem. The first seems to paint an issue on the basis of Mandarin knowledge as a minority issue. This is a little unfounded as other countries have national languages that are important to learn to allow for common communication to be carried out. After all, people learn English not because they worship the British or American people but because it has become common enough to be used in official communication and as a general medium.

Sure, Uyghur should be understood and taught but as such learning mandarin should not be a problem either if it is common in official use.(Is there a similar problem with Cantonese speaking Chinese?).

The second article is a graver matter as it seems that the CPC is trying to enforce anti-religious laws much like the Soviet Union. While it did work for a certain time, the resurgence of religion in Places like Tajikistan and its contribution to anti-soviet feelings cannot be discounted. At the same time, there is a real danger of importing less tolerant and militant interpretations of Islam from Pakistan and Afghanistan into the Uighur. This is detrimental as Uighurs were generally followers of Sufi interpretation which are much more balanced and tolerant of different practices; however, this must not be taken as complete submission to any unjust practices imposed by the state and the CPC may be better off interacting further with the religious leadership of the Uyghurs and specifically promoting Sufi Islam while using contacts within the religious community to counteract other more extremist interpretations.
 
Remember this when you rant about indian minorities.

In India, there is no majority people. Caste play the only important role. For example, if Muslims kill a Hindu dalit caste, only the particular Hindu Dalit caste would caste. The Brahmans and other twice born castes would care less.

Remember this when you rant about indian minorities.

In India, there is no majority people. Caste play the only important role. For example, if Muslims kill a Hindu dalit caste, only the particular Hindu Dalit caste would caste. The Brahmans and other twice born castes would care less.
 
If those KMT losers were in charge of China, they would have given away Tibet, Xinjiang and Diaoyu islands to the enemy. It's the KMT fascists that gave away Outer Mongolia.

KMT was a western puppet and allowed Japan to invade China. It took the CPC to crush the Japanese and gain independence. Without the CPC, China would probably be another vassal state of the west like Japan and India.

Sure, the CPC has its faults but they are the only people that has the ruthless attitude that's needed for a modern China. Confucius and KMT are outdated garbage.

All the success that China is having now is solely due to the CPC.

Sometimes i even feel a huge embarrassment by including KMT into the history of China, KMT was an illegal mafia regime who had stolen China from Beiyang, the true government of ROC.
 
Sometimes i even feel a huge embarrassment by including KMT into the history of China, KMT was an illegal mafia regime who had stolen China from Beiyang, the true government of ROC.

Really? REALLY? The corrupt and traitorous regime of Beiyang was more of an emberassment to Chinese history than the KMT would ever be... Remind you that that traitor Yuan Shikai and his entourage were the ones who allowed to have the Japs have a foothold in China in the first place, by handing over Qingdao!

I view the KMT more as a political component that COULD'VE had some great potential... If it were not for the militarist faction of that Mobster... erm sorry, I meant Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek to hijack the party.
 
Back
Top Bottom