What's new

Nuclear war between US, Russia would leave 5 billion dead from hunger, study says

Do you think a nuclear world war can happen in the next decade?


  • Total voters
    36

BHAN85

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
3,711
Reaction score
-6
Country
Spain
Location
Spain
"We must prevent a nuclear war from ever happening."
About 75% of the world's population would die from hunger following a nuclear war.
"No one has done this calculation before."
As many as 5 billion people worldwide – 75% of the global population – would die from famine and hunger after a nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia, a new study says.

 
. .
And ofcourse it would be wanted by the usa, anything to gain control of the world…..
These so-called countries just can’t sit peacefully, they just hav to get control and power….wtf

I’m not sure I’d even wanna survive that and face the fallout of such nuclear winters, i’d rather perish with the rest….it wouldn’t be normal at all for any survivors
 
.
Not surprised at all by this. A nuclear world war would be almost game over for the human race in general.

Most rational people know this. Only some of the sofa soldiers here would think otherwise.
I once played a nuclear war simulator as pakistan, I won by pre emptive strikes while only losing Karachi

Which is also a different kind of victory ( jk Karachi bros lol)
 
.
I once played a nuclear war simulator as pakistan, I won by pre emptive strikes while only losing Karachi

Which is also a different kind of victory ( jk Karachi bros lol)
I also once played a nuclear war simulator as pakistan, I won by pre emptive strikes while only losing Lahore

Which is also a different kind of victory ( jk Lahori bros lol)
 
.
It would destroy the world. Forget US vs Russia nuclear war. Even a "limited" nuclear war between Pakistan and India would bring the world down to its knees.
 
.
It would destroy the world. Forget US vs Russia nuclear war. Even a "limited" nuclear war between Pakistan and India would bring the world down to its knees.
There is a conspiracy theory which says a limited nuclear war is good to delay global warming because of 'nuclear winter'. Don't ask me for any evidence, I got none.
 
.
I also once played a nuclear war simulator as pakistan, I won by pre emptive strikes while only losing Lahore

Which is also a different kind of victory ( jk Lahori bros lol)
touche

Sheikhupura is also another one, some real a**hole people
 
Last edited:
.
touche

Sheikhupura is also another one, some real a**hole people

In my case, it's Sialkot. I actually thought about it the first time when 2 brothers were beaten to death in 2010. A few times afterwards too with conventional warheads and then again last year due to that Sri Lankan guy's case.
 
.
Not surprised at all by this. A nuclear world war would be almost game over for the human race in general.

Most rational people know this. Only some of the sofa soldiers here would think otherwise.
This is the same risk Putin took when invading the Ukraine, he knows if push comes to shove he will use Nuke options to push any opposition from US/NATO, now no matter how much NATO/USA hate Russia but no one will risk a full Nuclear War with Russians , they know if any country be it US go that route than its all over for everyone, now Putin knows this very well that no one will risk it all for Ukraine and his gamble payed off.
 
.
This is the same risk Putin took when invading the Ukraine, he knows if push comes to shove he will use Nuke options to push any opposition from US/NATO, now no matter how much NATO/USA hate Russia but no one will risk a full Nuclear War with Russians , they know if any country be it US go that route than its all over for everyone, now Putin knows this very well that no one will risk it all for Ukraine and his gamble payed off.
Objectively speaking, I would not say that.

In fact, I think Putin had lost that bet, that's why he doesn't bother with nuclear sabre rattling anymore when their force gets bogged down (Like back in April) and his force is going nowhere now.

The key to the question is whether or not Russia will use nuke on or Ukraine. If you look at the posturing, there are no where Putin can go but actually use nuke in Ukraine had this thing escalated. Yet US and the West still escalating things. First it is NLAW and Javelin, then it's Ex Soviet Artillery and Armoured Vehicle, and now it's advance US and Western Equipment. Essentially, what the West did is the same as March, the only different is they are giving more and more weapon to Ukraine and giving them move advance weapon.

This will drag on the war for Russia, that's definite outcome number 1. Which is what Russia don't want to see, but were there anything Russia can do? Other than attacking NATO supply line and try to get those weapons when they flux into Ukraine, there are pretty much nothing Putin can do. And he is more or less accepted this is going to be the case, and that's why he doesn't bothered with threatening with nuclear weapon anymore.

You can only threaten to destroy this world a couple of time, anything more than that it started to lose its weight, it will gradually become North Korea when the nuclear threat comes daily.
 
.
Objectively speaking, I would not say that.

In fact, I think Putin had lost that bet, that's why he doesn't bother with nuclear sabre rattling anymore when their force gets bogged down (Like back in April) and his force is going nowhere now.

The key to the question is whether or not Russia will use nuke on or Ukraine. If you look at the posturing, there are no where Putin can go but actually use nuke in Ukraine had this thing escalated. Yet US and the West still escalating things. First it is NLAW and Javelin, then it's Ex Soviet Artillery and Armoured Vehicle, and now it's advance US and Western Equipment. Essentially, what the West did is the same as March, the only different is they are giving more and more weapon to Ukraine and giving them move advance weapon.

This will drag on the war for Russia, that's definite outcome number 1. Which is what Russia don't want to see, but were there anything Russia can do? Other than attacking NATO supply line and try to get those weapons when they flux into Ukraine, there are pretty much nothing Putin can do. And he is more or less accepted this is going to be the case, and that's why he doesn't bothered with threatening with nuclear weapon anymore.

You can only threaten to destroy this world a couple of time, anything more than that it started to lose its weight, it will gradually become North Korea when the nuclear threat comes daily.
Use to be a thing in their media when talking about those weapons delivery and how they would respond.
 
.
Use to be a thing in their media when talking about those weapons delivery and how they would respond.
lol, they can't anymore. Otherwise they know their country would have to be doing it to make sense.

It's like Chinese Press and Pelosi visit. You can only talk about shooting down her plane once, afterward, anything you say is like a barking dog and no bite, nobody will see you seriously after that. Until you really go shoot down Pelosi's plane.......
 
.
lol, they can't anymore. Otherwise they know their country would have to be doing it to make sense.

It's like Chinese Press and Pelosi visit. You can only talk about shooting down her plane once, afterward, anything you say is like a barking dog and no bite, nobody will see you seriously after that. Until you really go shoot down Pelosi's plane.......
And now they bring in Steven Seagal. Loved his movies, but don't like what's he's doing joining with Russia.
 
.
Not surprised at all by this. A nuclear world war would be almost game over for the human race in general.

Most rational people know this. Only some of the sofa soldiers here would think otherwise.
Obligatory Einstein quote

ShortSays-Albert-Einstein-en-war2.jpg
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom