Bang Galore
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2010
- Messages
- 10,685
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
She has a problem with the Indian state in general, and opposes every move it makes. She also has a very critical view of the dealings of the state with tribals, with poor peasants or fisherfolk displaced by huge dam projects, or by metal-ore mining projects, or by factory building projects, or atomic power plants. These are just a few of the issues on which she has published very strong opinions which are not always very pleasing to hear for the politicians in power, the bureaucracy and the police, the military or capitalists.
Lots of battles.
Including the ones she fights on behalf of Kashmiri separatists.
The above examples cited are ones where her view point while being overly simplistic & bordering on anarchist at times are not views that are totally unpalatable. Her views on supporting the maoists on the other hand, going as far as to call them gun-toting Gandhians is far more incomprehensible (considering the record of the maoists) & doesn't lend itself to easy understanding, Her stand on this probably influences the reactions of many to her views on other matters too.
He deserved it , he said Modi would start a holocaust which is absurd and should not be a part of "freedom of speech"
Firstpost being a dickhead closed the comment section
That's silly. That law is absurd. Half of Indian members in this forum would be in jail if someone from the UPA had pressed charges on similar matters. It is a lunatic law & must be seen as such. Nobody should go to jail making such remarks. The internet allows from comments from all over the world, to be seen all over the world. Having such a law applicable to Indian citizens (realistically) alone is pointless & a waste of time. That chap certainly doesn't deserve to go to jail for his silly remarks.
Last edited: