NOW DRDO TO MAKE Invisible Planes using pre Mahabharata sage Bharadwaj's formulae

[Prajapati]

Careful, you don't want Lord Manvan to brand you a "secular" now, do you? Be a good hindu, and agree with whatever any loony claims about "ancient knowledge" - otherwise, you are a contemptible "secular". Oh, the shame!

oooohhhhhhh More digs about "good hindu"

I guess "Caste" is going to be your next attempt.

Again: This is not a battle between good hindus and bad seculars.

And again: Grow up.

To be more elaborate: Grow the fvck up.

Bye.

LOL..... third dig about "good hindu"

Careful , your bigotry is showing. Soon it will be too late for you to grow up.

 

[RisingShiningSuperpower]

Modi-ji and his ministers are researching advanced ancient technologies in Vedic texts and applying them to urgent defense needs.

Armed with these advanced technologies such as space travel and fusion energy, India will quickly become a superpower by 2020!


Invisible planes next on DRDO's radar, thanks to Sage Bharadwaj? - IBNLive

Invisible planes next on DRDO's radar, thanks to Sage Bharadwaj?
Panaji:India's premier Defence Research of Development Organisation DRDO is open to co-developing a technology promoted by an Indian scientist who claims he can make planes invisible using pre-Mahabharata sage Bharadwaj's formulae, a senior agency official said here Friday.

Speaking to IANS on the sidelines of the Bharatiya Vigyan Sammelan here, Satish Kumar, chief controller in-charge of research and development (technology management) at the Defence Research of Development Organisation (DRDO), said the agency was open to any technology which helps save time and cost.

"Oh yes, we have to work together. Certainly, we are looking for such kind of a partnership in the country," said Kumar, when asked if DRDO would be open to looking at an invisibility-enhancing alloy manufactured using ancient techniques by scientist CSR Prabhu, who claims it can have potential use for radar-defying stealth planes.

Indian scientist CSR Prabhu claims, can make invisible planes using pre-Mahabharata sage Bharadwaj's formulae. (Invisible plane, via Shutterstock)

Prabhu's presentation was one of the highlights of the three-day conference, which is being attended by scientists from several states, including those from the government sector.

Prabhu, a former head of the central government's National Informatics Centre, claimed that the formulae for the alloy has been sourced from Bharadwaj's book 'Brihad Viman Shastra' and could make even planes invisible, because it absorbed 80 per cent of the light.

Kumar, who has been associated with prestigious DRDO programmes like developing liquid propellant rocket engines for Prithvi and Agni missiles, also said any available indigenous technology had to be nurtured and that technology which saved cost and times was of interest to the DRDO.

"...wherever we see we can be benefited by technology by which we can reduce the time and cut the cost, certainly we will try to go for it," Kumar said.

The sammelan is aimed at creating awareness about traditional indigenous sciences and linking it to more modern science.

 

[Faiez]

LOL at you knowledge of physics. Things "made of black" do not absorb light. Things APPEAR black when it absorbs light.

Absorbing light DOES make something invisible. Actually a perfectly black object will be truly "invisible". It will appear like a blob of Nothing. Even a naturally back object becomes invisible in the night or in shadows.

Light is also ElectroMagnetic waves, so a "dark matter" will very well absorb EM waves, as it does for light. That is where the research is heading.

when I said "made of black", I meant paint/coating etc. you don't need the entire object to be made of light absorbing material, just coat it with it. Things are black when they're coated with light absorbing material.

Absorbing light just means light fired at it will not come back. If you have such an object in front of a light reflecting object, you will clearly see the dark spot where the "invisible" object is.

your last line is not completely true.

 

[Screambowl]

if some gora had made this statement.. toh yahan sab liberal chokrey wah wah wah wah ..karte dikhai dete. Shame on these people, who are ashamed of their own heritage. Utter sham.. Lakh di lanat.. salo doob maro ..

mein yahan germany mein Phd in electromechanical systems kar ke bhi I am supporting his statements.. and these uneducated ones are trying to be cool.. Bullshit!!

 

[Faiez]

The first two sentences are fine, but the rest is misleading. (Correct, but liable to be misunderstood.) So let me clarify.

In this context, there is a big difference between how radars and human eyes operate. Human eyes perceive the light produced by the sun or other sources, and also perceives the same light reflected off objects. But radars produce their own "light" (or rather, radio waves) and then perceive the EM waves reflected off an object, to detect the object.

So if you can make an object absorb all the radar waves striking it, that object would be invisible to radars, because they cannot perceive the boundary between that object and the sky. But an object that absorbs all the visible light striking it, would not be invisible to the human eye - it would be very black.

For an object to be invisible to the human eye, it has to be fully transparent - ie, light should completely pass through it, with no absorption or reflection.

let me explain. eyes and radars work the exact same way. the difference is when we see a black plane in the sky, we see it because the background (the sky) gives off light, so we see this one plane shaped black area which is the plane.

the radar will not see it (if it's a radio absorbing material on plane) because radio waves go right through the atmosphere, so there would be no difference between the plane and the rest of the view. the plane would blend in.

the black plane would be visible to naked eye if the sky were light absorbing, but it's not.

being invisible in the visible light spectrum is much harder than on radio etc.

 

[Screambowl]

Furthermore, on April 30, 2009, two teams of scientists developed a cloak that rendered objects invisible to near-infrared light. Unlike its predecessors, this technology did not utilize metals, which improves cloaking since metals cause some light to be lost. Researchers mentioned that since the approach can be scaled down further in size, it was a major step towards a cloak that would work for visible light.

This for uneducated people here who know nothing about optics!!!!

when I said "made of black", I meant paint/coating etc. you don't need the entire object to be made of light absorbing material, just coat it with it. Things are black when they're coated with light absorbing material.

Absorbing light just means light fired at it will not come back. If you have such an object in front of a light reflecting object, you will clearly see the dark spot where the "invisible" object is.

your last line is not completely true.

even a blck body sends out radiation. we call it black body radiation. The basic argument is about.. invisibility with transparency.





PS: BC yeh toh manoge na ab.. gorey ne kaha hai ... ghulam logo
On the other hand, a group of researchers connected with Berkeley Lab and the University of California, Berkeley believe that cloaking at optical frequencies is indeed possible. Furthermore, it appears within reach. Their solution to the hurdles presented by cloaking issues are dielectrics. These nonconducting materials (dielectrics) are used for a carpet cloak, which serves as an optical cloaking device.[16][17] According to the lead investigator:

Lo BC aur... sharam toh hai nahi.. apney logo ki izzat karne ki adat hai nahi... gora jab tak nahi kahega tab tak Ji huzur karne se rahy...

see this

Vladimir Shalaev, a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Purdue. "Ideally, if we make it real it would work exactly like Harry Potter's invisibility cloak," he said. "It's not going to be heavy because there's going to be very little metal in it."

 

[Mrc]

Have india succeeded in making a visible plane yet?? Before we discuss invisible ones

 

[janon]

Have india succeeded in making a visible plane yet?? Before we discuss invisible ones

LOL. Brutal, but valid question.

If I expound in detail about why "ancient knowledge" or shastras have nothing valuable to contribute in the field of radar invisibility or low observability, I will be branded a "secular" by the likes of lord manvan (as if that's an insult) or ashamed of my heritage, according to @Screambowl (as if our heritage is full of invisible planes.)

FFS people, stop glorifying the past.

 

[Screambowl]

LOL. Brutal, but valid question.

If I expound in detail about why "ancient knowledge" or shastras have nothing valuable to contribute in the field of radar invisibility or low observability, I will be branded a "secular" by the likes of lord manvan (as if that's an insult) or ashamed of my heritage, according to @Screambowl (as if our heritage is full of invisible planes.)

FFS people, stop glorifying the past.

It is not about branding you secular or blaming you. the point is, fine he has said something which is very tough to achieve and research is going on. But it is possible, and that'S why research is going on. Why don't any one make fun of those who are carrying out this research outside India?

 

[janon]

if some gora had made this statement.. toh yahan sab liberal chokrey wah wah wah wah ..karte dikhai dete. Shame on these people, who are ashamed of their own heritage. Utter sham.. Lakh di lanat.. salo doob maro ..

mein yahan germany mein Phd in electromechanical systems kar ke bhi I am supporting his statements.. and these uneducated ones are trying to be cool.. Bullshit!!

You may be swayed by "goras" statements, but rest assured that most of us are not. Scientific facts and objective reality are independent of the colour of the skin of those who aver it.

Instead of all this name calling and frothing, would you care to expound which part of "our heritage" (as you call it) sets forth radar invisibility of aircrafts? When you say "our own heritage", what exactly do you mean? Who's heritage? In which ancient texts are the principles of low observability laid forth? How have low observable aircrafts been part of our collective heritage? Please do explain in detail.

It is not about branding you secular or blaming you. the point is, fine he has said something which is very tough to achieve and research is going on. But it is possible, and that'S why research is going on. Why don't any one make fun of those who are carrying out this research outside India?

Nobody is making fun of him for doing that research. What we are making fun of are his claims that low radar observability or invisibility have been described factually in any shastras orf were part of "anccient knowledge". You yourself said that people who deride these claims are ashamed of their own heritage. So tell me, which heritage of ours has anything to do with low radar observability?

If an American scientist claimed that such knowledge exited in the native American texts or heritage, or if a European claimed that such knowledge existed among prehistoric druids, we would make fun of them as well.

 

[mehul sharma]

@isupportaap he clearly saying whatever we can take from these ancient vedic scriptures we should take it why this hohalla about it.This will save us money and time and if you support aap you should support Indian vedic knowledge at least and you posting this news in this forum by intention of making fun of ancient Hindu scripture is not good you should refrain yourself from doing it

why dont they make him invisible will be good for the whole region ...........

you can not handle when you can see him what will he do to you when he will get invisible

 

[Screambowl]

You may be swayed by "goras" statements, but rest assured that most of us are not. Scientific facts and objective reality are independent of the colour of the skin of those who aver it.

Instead of all this name calling and frothing, would you care to expound which part of "our heritage" (as you call it) sets forth radar invisibility of aircrafts? When you say "our own heritage", what exactly do you mean? Who's heritage? In which ancient texts are the principles of low observability laid forth? How have low observable aircrafts been part of our collective heritage? Please do explain in detail.


Nobody is making fun of him for doing that research. What we are making fun of are his claims that low radar observability or invisibility have been described factually in any shastras orf were part of "anccient knowledge". You yourself said that people who deride these claims are ashamed of their own heritage. So tell me, which heritage of ours has anything to do with low radar observability?

If an American scientist claimed that such knowledge exited in the native American texts or heritage, or if a European claimed that such knowledge existed among prehistoric druids, we would make fun of them as well.

There is only statement for this.. well a video.

 

[Magnet]

you can not handle when you can see him what will he do to you when he will get invisible

yar is ko pehli bar hakumat mili hai enjoy karne do na kuch time guzre ga khawab choor choor ho jaenge congresss ko sab maloom tha ke pakistan kya hai , yeh abhi abhi aya hai enjoy karne do na is ko

 

[janon]

There is only statement for this.. well a video.

Oh, dear.

What has that got to do with what I asked you? My boy, you are the one who is worshipping "goras", not me. You are so happy that a "gora" (Robert Oppenheimer) quoted the Gita. As if Mr Oppenheimer quoting it is what makes it great. You are so desperate for recognition from"goras", that you think one "gora" scientist quoting two lines from the Gita is such a great compliment.

Anyway, all that apart - my question to you was where in "our heritage" or in any ancient hindu scripture is low radar observability explained. Or scientific details about making invisible materials. If you cannot find any such expositions, in future kindly refrain from claims that skeptics like us are ashamed of "our heritage" and so forth.

 

[mehul sharma]

yar is ko pehli bar hakumat mili hai enjoy karne do na kuch time guzre ga khawab choor choor ho jaenge congresss ko sab maloom tha ke pakistan kya hai , yeh abhi abhi aya hai enjoy karne do na is ko

hahahaha okay ji krne dete hai aap khte ho to na to aaj hi resignation tha inka