North korea launches ICBM, test appears success. Second stage drops near Ph

[Wright]

The Soviets went down. Communism does not work, and cold war remnants face the same fate regardless of rockets which the Soviets had in the 50's.

In the long run it makes no difference. They are still a poor starving nation.

 

[500]

Jafari stated that Iran is one of the few states capable of launching satellites into GEO, adding: “With this missile and on this level, I don’t think that except for two or three countries and Iran, any other country would be capable of sending satellites into GEO.”

Funny. Iran cant launch a proper satellite even to LEO.

Holly **** !!! unbelievable ...

Fully agree.

 

[SOHEIL]

Funny. Iran cant launch a proper satellite even to LEO.


Fully agree.

HiiiiM

we will see kid ! we will see ...

Remember !!!

you can't Edit your post after two days

 

[SHAHED]

Funny. Iran cant launch a proper satellite even to LEO.


Fully agree.

Fully agree !!! you didn't get my point !

 

[SOHEIL]

Fully agree !!! you didn't get my point !

i want to see his face after launch

 

[SHAHED]

i want to see his face after launch

Me too

 

[jhungary]

To the NKR's cheerleaders here, there is a point: That North Korea is a loser and have been all these decades since the establishment of the partition.

Notice not one of them will come out and say that he would rather live in North Korea over the South. But while they think it is safer not to answer regarding which, North or South Korea, East or West Berlin, their silence is equally revealing about their intellectual dishonesty. Support and cheer for North Korea is shallow and convenient, the equivalent of a one-night stand over a long relationship. North Korea is an abomination and they know it.

Cowards, the lot of them.

i am against any counrty's nuclear development, i will protest even Canada were toget nuke.

People cheering for North Korean simply because they (NK) are against the US and its camp, not because they genuine glad or concern (For better or worse) that NK Process nuclear weapon.

They would generally agrue if US have nuke, why can't North Korean.

What they don't care is how North Korean Suffer just their government can get a face on the international stage.

Do bear in mind, even offical Chinese stance were against NK having nuke, but that does not do anything to our Chinese member here, as long as NK Shove it in the west face, they wil lcheer about it. It's simple as that.

Nuke are the enemy of the world, it does not matter who has it, be it the US, UK, Israel, India, Pakistan, China and North Korean. People cheering for nuclear proliferation, regardless of which country, should have their head checked.

 

[500]

Me too

I will be too old then. Better see it when i am still young.

 

[SHAHED]

I will be too old then. Better see it when i am still young.

Fully Agree !!!

 

[Audio]

I hear toilet paper is a luxury commodity in Iran. As long as you have nuke programme and some imaginary GEO capability, it is ok, right?

Iran bans 'luxury' imports as sanctions bite - Yahoo! News

 

[Aramsogo]

i am against any counrty's nuclear development, i will protest even Canada were toget nuke.

People cheering for North Korean simply because they (NK) are against the US and its camp, not because they genuine glad or concern (For better or worse) that NK Process nuclear weapon.

They would generally agrue if US have nuke, why can't North Korean.

What they don't care is how North Korean Suffer just their government can get a face on the international stage.

Do bear in mind, even offical Chinese stance were against NK having nuke, but that does not do anything to our Chinese member here, as long as NK Shove it in the west face, they wil lcheer about it. It's simple as that.

Nuke are the enemy of the world, it does not matter who has it, be it the US, UK, Israel, India, Pakistan, China and North Korean. People cheering for nuclear proliferation, regardless of which country, should have their head checked.

You are so ignorant. In modern history no country has had a higher percentage of its civilian population decimated as what Curtis Lemay did to North Korea in the Korean War. Were nukes used ?? No, but I don't think that made a difference to the millions of North Koreans burned alive by LeMay's intentional fire bombing of civilian targets and use of incendiaries. Lemay was definitely one of history's great mass murderers. There were no nukes used, so you must feel better?? If there is one country that deserves to have nukes to defend themselves against a genocidal enemy, it's really the North Koreans.

 

[jhungary]

You are so ignorant. In modern history no country has had a higher percentage of its civilian population decimated as what Curtis Lemay did to North Korea in the Korean War. Were nukes used ?? No, but I don't think that made a difference to the millions of North Koreans burned alive by LeMay's intentional fire bombing of civilian targets and use of incendiaries. Lemay was definitely one of history's great mass murderers. There were no nukes used, so you must feel better?? If there is one country that deserves to have nukes to defend themselves against a genocidal enemy, it's really the North Koreans.

Are you for real? Comparing an "Extincting Event" from a "Mass Casualty Event"

The world will not end if there are 10 curtis lemay and firbombing North Korea. Even this will not be the end of North Korea.

The world will definitely end if there are 10 nuke in the air heading in different direction, so you honestly think Nuke is the best deterence to your defence? No, Nuke will be the last thing people will do/use when it use as it wil gurantee a end-of-the-world incident. It doesn't matter who use it. The world is gone man, so why are you yapping about?

 

[Aramsogo]

Are you for real? Comparing an "Extincting Event" from a "Mass Casualty Event"

The world will not end if there are 10 curtis lemay and firbombing North Korea. Even this will not be the end of North Korea.

The world will definitely end if there are 10 nuke in the air heading in different direction, so you honestly think Nuke is the best deterence to your defence? No, Nuke will be the last thing people will do/use when it use as it wil gurantee a end-of-the-world incident. It doesn't matter who use it. The world is gone man, so why are you yapping about?

Are you out of junior high ?? The Cold War proved nukes and a credible nuclear deterrent is the best guarantor of peace in our times. Ever wonder why the Arabs only use proxies against Israel now?? Ever wonder why the US only fought the USSR with satellite states?? North Korea has every right to have nukes, just like any other country.

 

[jhungary]

Are you out of junior high ?? The Cold War proved nukes and a credible nuclear deterrent is the best guarantor of peace in our times. Ever wonder why the Arabs only use proxies against Israel now?? Ever wonder why the US only fought the USSR with satellite states?? North Korea has every right to have nukes, just like any other country.

keyword, "The cold war"

the cold war has ended about 20 years ago, are you implying US-China or US-North Korea are still considering theis legacy? There are only a few Nuclear power country during the Cold war so yes, back then it a deterence force to be reckon with.

Yeah, North Korea have nuke so, does that mean they are never gonna be attacked. Look at India abnd Pakistan, both have nuke, yet you see them fighting on their border almost every year.

Having nuke are no longer a deterence as you know if you use it, it's the end of the world, this leverage alone negate the effect of nulcear power. People who advocate nuke are the same to advocate the end of the world.

Wake up and smell the coffee, dude, move ahead dude, and get a doc to check your head

 

[Aramsogo]

keyword, "The cold war"

the cold war has ended about 20 years ago, are you implying US-China or US-North Korea are still considering theis legacy? There are only a few Nuclear power country during the Cold war so yes, back then it a deterence force to be reckon with.

Yeah, North Korea have nuke so, does that mean they are never gonna be attacked. Look at India abnd Pakistan, both have nuke, yet you see them fighting on their border almost every year.

Having nuke are no longer a deterence as you know if you use it, it's the end of the world, this leverage alone negate the effect of nulcear power. People who advocate nuke are the same to advocate the end of the world.

Wake up and smell the coffee, dude, move ahead dude, and get a doc to check your head

It must nice to live in your world with its unicorns, pegasus, magic carpets and all.

Notice how Pakistan and India haven't had a real war since both became declared nuclear states. DOOOHH!!