Hasbara Buster
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2010
- Messages
- 4,612
- Reaction score
- -7
Sanctions are an act of war, Washington started this war and is perpetuating it. Don't fall for the propaganda.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You think Seoul can survive the North Korea's artillery specifically aimed at it ?
You do not mess with a mad man , it was really foolish of USA to start the whole provocation and put South Korea in danger , the mainland is far away and a normal Korean will bear the blunt of that psychopath Kim's actions ...
Read " Samson's option "
Man,
Once Kim impossible fires first shot,how long do you think it would take the combined might of US+SK+Japan to pulverize everything close to Demilitarize zone.
Artillery barrage to be effective need time.Also Artillery is a fixed target with low mobility.There is a good chance that SK has all Artillery emplacements marked for counter artillery barrage.And given the technological difference,i am of the opinion that NK artillery would be silenced within 15 minutes of the commencement of hostilities.
The side which theorized this option has resources to carry it out.Israel has close to 300(postulated) Thermonuclear Nukes.It could annihilate its opponent.
NK has 2 nukes that too of the yield which probably couple of MOABS would surpass.
The biggest weapon of NK is that they are ***** poor and no one would want to shoulder the cost of reconstruction.
Man,
Once Kim impossible fires first shot,how long do you think it would take the combined might of US+SK+Japan to pulverize everything close to Demilitarize zone.
Artillery barrage to be effective need time.Also Artillery is a fixed target with low mobility.There is a good chance that SK has all Artillery emplacements marked for counter artillery barrage.And given the technological difference,i am of the opinion that NK artillery would be silenced within 15 minutes of the commencement of hostilities.
it seems you live in LALA Land silence 10000 peace of Artillery targeted at Seoul in just 15 min
by the way let say each artillery can fire one rocket or shell per minute it would be 150000 shell in the first 15 min . well I think that is very healthy for Seoul
Man,
Once Kim impossible fires first shot,how long do you think it would take the combined might of US+SK+Japan to pulverize everything close to Demilitarize zone.
Artillery barrage to be effective need time.Also Artillery is a fixed target with low mobility.There is a good chance that SK has all Artillery emplacements marked for counter artillery barrage.And given the technological difference,i am of the opinion that NK artillery would be silenced within 15 minutes of the commencement of hostilities.
The side which theorized this option has resources to carry it out.Israel has close to 300(postulated) Thermonuclear Nukes.It could annihilate its opponent.
NK has 2 nukes that too of the yield which probably couple of MOABS would surpass.
The biggest weapon of NK is that they are ***** poor and no one would want to shoulder the cost of reconstruction.
Man,
Once Kim impossible fires first shot,how long do you think it would take the combined might of US+SK+Japan to pulverize everything close to Demilitarize zone.
Artillery barrage to be effective need time.Also Artillery is a fixed target with low mobility.There is a good chance that SK has all Artillery emplacements marked for counter artillery barrage.And given the technological difference,i am of the opinion that NK artillery would be silenced within 15 minutes of the commencement of hostilities.
The side which theorized this option has resources to carry it out.Israel has close to 300(postulated) Thermonuclear Nukes.It could annihilate its opponent.
NK has 2 nukes that too of the yield which probably couple of MOABS would surpass.
The biggest weapon of NK is that they are ***** poor and no one would want to shoulder the cost of reconstruction.
I have no doubts that North Korea will go down but it can and has the power to inflict " unacceptable damage " on South Korea while the Americans are protected in their mainland . The million dollar question here is " Why should a common Korea ( on both sides ) minus the Govt fight a war for US interests ? " . What is to be gained with the whole episode starting with US provocation by flights to the peninsula ?
Pray tell me , how much time ? Is it hours , days or weeks ? No , that artillery fire can begin within minutes of a declaration of war , what is the South going to do then ? I am sure that they have counter artillery but how exactly do you neutralize the world's largest artillery force with 11,000-13,000 artillery within minutes as per you ? Here's some excerpt I found at IISS
Nonetheless, despite shortages of spare parts, fuel and training time, North Korea’s conventional capabilities pose a significant threat to allied forces and South Korea’s population. For example, North Korea’s artillery capability does not require sophisticated tactics nor modes of operation to pose a threat to Seoul. In any conflict, North Korean artillery, firing from fortified positions near the DMZ, could initially deliver a heavy bombardment on the South Korean capital. Allied counter-battery fire and air strikes would eventually reduce North Korea’s artillery capability, but not before significant damage and high casualties had been inflicted on Seoul.
http://www.iiss.org/publications/st...he-conventional-military-balance-on-the-kore/
Even if its nuclear arsenal could be bombed, North Korea has 11,000 artillery pieces aimed at Seoul, only 26 miles from the border. A 5 to 6 minute barrage would reduce the South Korean capital to rubble. Even if each piece fired only once before being bombed as well, 11,000 artillery shells would rain down on Seoul.
The arsenal includes 13,000 artillery pieces, along with rockets, multiple-rocket launchers and more than 650 ballistic missiles. Warheads on the missiles can be armed with nerve gas and blistering and choking agents. The North Koreans continue to develop biological weapons such as anthrax, plague, cholera and even smallpox, according to U.S. intelligence.
Estimates of the damage that could be inflicted by a North Korean attack range from bad to apocalyptic. Lee Yang Ho, defense minister during a similar nuclear crisis in 1994, said one computer simulation conducted during his term projected 1 million dead, including thousands of Americans."It is assumed that if the United States were to strike North Korea that the North Koreans would fight back," Lee said. "All industry would be destroyed, gas stations, power plants. This is such a densely populated area that even if North Korean artillery were not very accurate, anyplace you would hit there would be huge numbers of casualties."
Seoul's Vulnerability Is Key to War Scenarios
The side which theorized this option was somehow trying to show the Americans that they will defend themselves by putting a trigger to their head , the same is true with North Korea . It just happens that Tel Aviv threat profile is quite large but Pyongyang has few enemies and they are very close .
No , the number is estimated to be around 10-14 range enough to again do " unacceptable damage " on South Korea , Japan and US military bases around .
I will agree on that , but there's no end to Kim's madness , the Chinese are on record saying that we asked him to become more open to the world and he didn't listen .
I have no doubts that North Korea will go down but it can and has the power to inflict " unacceptable damage " on South Korea while the Americans are protected in their mainland . The million dollar question here is " Why should a common Korea ( on both sides ) minus the Govt fight a war for US interests ? " . What is to be gained with the whole episode starting with US provocation by flights to the peninsula ?
Pray tell me , how much time ? Is it hours , days or weeks ? No , that artillery fire can begin within minutes of a declaration of war , what is the South going to do then ? I am sure that they have counter artillery but how exactly do you neutralize the world's largest artillery force with 11,000-13,000 artillery within minutes as per you ? Here's some excerpt I found at IISS
Nonetheless, despite shortages of spare parts, fuel and training time, North Korea’s conventional capabilities pose a significant threat to allied forces and South Korea’s population. For example, North Korea’s artillery capability does not require sophisticated tactics nor modes of operation to pose a threat to Seoul. In any conflict, North Korean artillery, firing from fortified positions near the DMZ, could initially deliver a heavy bombardment on the South Korean capital. Allied counter-battery fire and air strikes would eventually reduce North Korea’s artillery capability, but not before significant damage and high casualties had been inflicted on Seoul.
http://www.iiss.org/publications/st...he-conventional-military-balance-on-the-kore/
Even if its nuclear arsenal could be bombed, North Korea has 11,000 artillery pieces aimed at Seoul, only 26 miles from the border. A 5 to 6 minute barrage would reduce the South Korean capital to rubble. Even if each piece fired only once before being bombed as well, 11,000 artillery shells would rain down on Seoul.
The arsenal includes 13,000 artillery pieces, along with rockets, multiple-rocket launchers and more than 650 ballistic missiles. Warheads on the missiles can be armed with nerve gas and blistering and choking agents. The North Koreans continue to develop biological weapons such as anthrax, plague, cholera and even smallpox, according to U.S. intelligence.
Estimates of the damage that could be inflicted by a North Korean attack range from bad to apocalyptic. Lee Yang Ho, defense minister during a similar nuclear crisis in 1994, said one computer simulation conducted during his term projected 1 million dead, including thousands of Americans."It is assumed that if the United States were to strike North Korea that the North Koreans would fight back," Lee said. "All industry would be destroyed, gas stations, power plants. This is such a densely populated area that even if North Korean artillery were not very accurate, anyplace you would hit there would be huge numbers of casualties."
Seoul's Vulnerability Is Key to War Scenarios
The side which theorized this option was somehow trying to show the Americans that they will defend themselves by putting a trigger to their head , the same is true with North Korea . It just happens that Tel Aviv threat profile is quite large but Pyongyang has few enemies and they are very close .
No , the number is estimated to be around 10-14 range enough to again do " unacceptable damage " on South Korea , Japan and US military bases around .
I will agree on that , but there's no end to Kim's madness , the Chinese are on record saying that we asked him to become more open to the world and he didn't listen .