What's new

No Pak role in fomenting trouble in Afghanistan, says Petraeus

And u r even more irrelevant to US, India and even this forum. Why don't u take that good advice and quit trolling. Go outside and do something productive.

wait till he becomes Sec of State and starts touring Islamabad.
But your advise about going outside and doing something productive is always welcome and I will.
 
.
Patraeus is largely insignificant to the US, even less to India. Of course given Pak status it is understandable you guys have to grab on to whatever straws blow your way! It is of course good advise from you to Indians to work hard to become a developed country. I'm sure they will have some good advise for you too.
You are proving to be an idiot. And I am noted for my tolerance.

Did you even bother to comprehend David Petraeus's assertions? He did not dismiss contacts of ISI with some militant groups:

"there's communication between the ISI and various militant groups in FATA and Balochistan (Haqqanis, Taliban, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, etc) but some of it you'd do anyway as an intelligence service."

That is not a secret anymore. However, Petraeus understands the importance of such contacts because he knows how intelligence agencies are supposed to work. He even stated this:

"there may be some degree of accommodation that is forced on them (Pakistanis) because of the limits of their (Pakistan's) forces."

However, he dispelled the myth that there is some grand conspiracy from ISI to jeopardize American mission in Afghanistan:

"I looked very very hard then (as US commander in Afghanistan) and again as CIA director at the nature of the relationship between the various (militant) groups in FATA and Baluchistan and the Pakistan Army and the ISI and I was never convinced of what certain journalists have alleged (about ISI support of militant groups in FATA).... I have talked to them (journalists) asked them what their sources are and I have not been able to come to grips with that based on what I know from these different positions (as US commander and CIA director)".

His point is that sensational journalism is responsible for that kind of disinformation or impression. And he is right.
 
.
Look, no need to defend yourself, it is ok if you are that interested in wieners. It is your business, I don't ask and you don't have to tell.

Man you got roasted ..Playing cool won't cut it..:laughcry: .. now get that tail in your legs and start running..:whistle:
 
.
You are proving to be an idiot. And I am noted for my tolerance.

Did you even bother to comprehend David Petraeus's assertions? He did not dismiss contacts of ISI with some militant groups:

"there's communication between the ISI and various militant groups in FATA and Balochistan (Haqqanis, Taliban, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, etc) but some of it you'd do anyway as an intelligence service."

That is not a secret anymore. However, Petraeus understands the importance of such contacts because he knows how intelligence agencies are supposed to work. He even stated this:

"there may be some degree of accommodation that is forced on them (Pakistanis) because of the limits of their (Pakistan's) forces."

However, he dispelled the myth that there is some grand conspiracy from ISI to jeopardize American mission in Afghanistan:

"I looked very very hard then (as US commander in Afghanistan) and again as CIA director at the nature of the relationship between the various (militant) groups in FATA and Baluchistan and the Pakistan Army and the ISI and I was never convinced of what certain journalists have alleged (about ISI support of militant groups in FATA).... I have talked to them (journalists) asked them what their sources are and I have not been able to come to grips with that based on what I know from these different positions (as US commander and CIA director)".

His point is that sensational journalism is responsible for that kind of disinformation or impression. And he is right.

Obviously you are into self definitions and if you think you are noted for tolerance cool your life ambition accomplished.

Rest of what you've written in pointless garbage and I am not tolerant of such garbage. Don't need your version of what Petraeus said.

Man you got roasted ..Playing cool won't cut it..:laughcry: .. now get that tail in your legs and start running..:whistle:

like I said, you don't have to tell. I won't ask.
 
. .
i know you are burned ..but y so much feel..:rofl::rofl:.. as a matter of fact you are what you are..our fugly neighbor :whistle:

don't be silly and waste time in childish arguments. Do you have an opinion on this subject or came around to just support your D.A.D.T pal?
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom