What's new

"No first use" Maybe changed if new goverment comes to power

GreenFoe

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 14, 2013
Messages
1,306
Reaction score
-7
(Reuters) - India's opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), widely tipped to form the next government, pledged on Monday to revise the country's nuclear doctrine, whose central principle is that New Delhi would not be first to use atomic weapons in a conflict.

Unveiling its election manifesto, the party gave no details,

but sources involved in drafting the document said the "no-first-use" policy introduced after India conducted a series of nuclear tests in 1998 would be reconsidered.

Arch-rival Pakistan, which responded within weeks that year by conducting tests of its own, does not profess "no first use".

The BJP, which was in power at the time of India's underground blasts, appears to be on the cusp of returning to government under the leadership of Narendra Modi, a Hindu nationalist many expect would adopt a muscular foreign policy.

The BJP made no mention of reviewing nuclear policy in its manifesto for the previous elections in 2009.

Opinion polls have consistently shown that the BJP will emerge as the biggest party in the five-week election that began on Monday. They suggest that, while the party is likely to fall short of the parliamentary majority needed to rule on its own, it would have the best chance to form a coalition government.

Two aides to Modi told Reuters in the run-up to the vote that if he becomes prime minister, India would get tougher in territorial disputes with China and more robust with Pakistan over attacks by Islamist militants based there.

In its manifesto, the party said it would seek friendly relations with neighbors, but - without naming any country - vowed to "deal with cross-border terrorism with a firm hand" and take a "strong stand and steps" when required.

India adopted a no-first-use policy at a time when it was under pressure from punitive embargoes by Western nations for its nuclear tests, but since then it has been unofficially accepted as a nuclear power.

The United States struck a deal with New Delhi in 2008 to give it access to civilian nuclear technology as well as finance even while it carried on with its weapon program.

The no-first-use policy was based on a premise that India would retaliate so massively against a nuclear strike that an enemy would not contemplate such a move in the first place.

However, a source who advises the BJP said there has been significant debate in recent years about being bound to the policy given the advances of Pakistan's nuclear capability.

He said Pakistan's nuclear inventory may have already overtaken that of its neighbor, and it has claimed progress in miniaturization of weapons for use on the battlefield.

"Do we need tactical weapons? This issue was never raised and discussed because at the time it was not a concern." said another source involved in drawing up the manifesto.

"MAD" DOCTRINE

Murli Manohar Joshi, head of a committee that framed the BJP's nuclear policy, declined to spell out whether no-first-use could be discarded. "Read the manifesto," he told Reuters. "It has to be in sync with geostrategic conditions."

There was no immediate reaction from the Pakistan government or its military, which controls foreign and defense policy.

A former Pakistani national security adviser, retired Major-General Mahmud Ali Durrani, said he would not be concerned if India revised the central tenet of its nuclear doctrine.

"I don't think it will be of great consequence," he said. "The nuclear doctrine here is MAD (mutually assured destruction). If one side does it, the other side has enough to cause unacceptable damage in response."

Durrani said there was more concern in Pakistan about the "overall attitude" of Modi, who was chief minister of the western Indian state of Gujarat in 2002 when more than 1,000 people, mostly Muslims, were slaughtered in mob violence.

Modi has always vehemently denied that he allowed, or even encouraged, the bloodshed, driven by a Hindu nationalist agenda, and a Supreme Court inquiry found no evidence to prosecute him.

The BJP manifesto set out its Hindu nationalist leanings, with a vow to explore building a temple at the site of a mosque in northern India that was torn down by zealots 22 years ago, potentially putting a deeply controversial issue back into play.

"There's a religious right in the BJP so they want to acknowledge that without making it the centerpiece of the manifesto," said Ashok Malik, a political columnist. "I don't think the BJP is going to take it forward as a political movement."

The party also made a commitment to withdrawing a special autonomous status accorded to Jammu and Kashmir state, India's only Muslim-majority region, which many believe prolongs ambiguity over the status of a territory claimed by Pakistan.

It added that it would aim for the return of Hindus who left Kashmir when the region was roiled by an Islamist insurgency.

(Additional reporting by Frank Jack Daniel in NEW DELHI and Katharine Houreld in ISLAMABAD; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan)

India's BJP puts 'no first use' nuclear policy in doubt| Reuters
 
The ' No first use ' was BJP's idea back then.

Its unlikely to change.
 
What we say and what we do , do not have to be them same things.
 
Is anywhere it is mentioned in the election manifesto?
 
This is worthless speculation. We will not revise " No First Use "
 
Is anywhere it is mentioned in the election manifesto?

This is what manifesto says ...

Independent Strategic Nuclear Programme

BJP believes that the strategic gains acquired by India during the Atal Bihari Vajpayee regime on the
nuclear programme have been frittered away by the Congress. Our emphasis was, and remains on,
beginning of a new thrust on framing policies that would serve India's national interest in the 21st
century. We will follow a two-pronged independent nuclear programme, unencumbered by foreign
pressure and influence, for civilian and military purposes, especially as nuclear power is a major
contributor to India's energy sector.
BJP will:

Study in detail India's nuclear doctrine, and revise and update it, to make it relevant to challenges
of current times.


Maintain a credible minimum deterrent that is in tune with changing geostatic realities.

Invest in India's indigenous Thorium Technology Programme.

This is worthless speculation. We will not revise " No First Use "

Its not a bad idea ,terrorist use it to gain advantage !
Are they hell bent on calling in another sanction? :D
Has anybody put sanction on pak even it does not accept NFU?
 
the people of indian is expecting too much in modhi....
 
Not a good idea . World believes in our "No first use policy" And i strongly believe that this policy should not be touched. It's just unnessesary to provoke World community.:undecided:

:disagree::disagree::disagree::disagree::disagree::disagree:
 
All these "No First Use", NPT, etc. nonsense are propaganda weapons to be used by the West against countries which they want to pressure or sanction.

Since India is the darling of the West, it doesn't matter if it is has "No First Use", or "No Last Use" policy...
 
All these "No First Use", NPT, etc. nonsense are propaganda weapons to be used by the West against countries which they want to pressure or sanction.

Since India is the darling of the West, it doesn't matter if it is has "No First Use", or "No Last Use" policy...

There is a difference btw Darling which is Pakistan & Partner which is India
We are not letting our people get bombed by Foriegn military powers
Unlike of course you
 
So India has lost faith in and have Real doubts about their Conventional military Strength to Subdue Pakistan.. :lol:..seems like Indians are waking from the wet dream of Akhand Bharat..
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom