Nizami’s death penalty not fair governance: Erdoğan

[cloud4000]

Since pretty long. You can google the relationship history as I don't do spoon feeding.

Sorry. Just because two countries have a close relationship doesn't make them allies. And even if it did, doesn't give Turkey the right to interfere in Bangladesh's affairs.

 

[Apprentice]

Sorry. Just because two countries have a close relationship doesn't make them allies. And even if it did, doesn't give Turkey the right to interfere in Bangladesh's affairs.

Then why has India made BD into its state?

 

[cloud4000]

Then why has India made BD into its state?

What does have to do with what I said? Last time I checked, Bangladesh is a sovereign country. India might have influence, but it doesn't control it like a colony.

 

[dray]

I would like to see BD member to respond to that question not an Indian .Just like you said their country their rule

No problem, look for responses from BD members, but unfortunately you cannot (and should not) control the discussion or the participants here.

 

[American Pakistani]

Sorry. Just because two countries have a close relationship doesn't make them allies. And even if it did, doesn't give Turkey the right to interfere in Bangladesh's affairs.

It does because they are an ally of Pakistan. And Bangladesh and Pakistan has signed the agreement on prosecutions.

P.S indians should be the last people to lecture as they are the first ones to poke their nasty noses in other people's affairs, be it South China Sea or Syrian refugees in Europe.

 

[dray]

Then why has India made BD into its state?

When?

 

[The Sandman]

lol what an irony indians telling others to mind their own business

 

[bongbang]

We dont consider dual residency from any of the South Asian countries+MM. If JeI get rid of Pak Indian sphere and go to any other sphere and gains the trust of BD gradually, I want to take it positively. Better luck their next batch of leaders.

 

[24 Hours]

Oh! wow, now Bangladesh is the province of the India?? @BDforever @Doyalbaba @Anubis @SHK @Khan saheb


and who the hell are you interfering in other's internal matter..

He's a stupid dog, he doesn't know any better.

 

[T-123456]

Turkey should not interfere into the internal matters of India
@T-123456 @Zulkarneyn why did President Erdogan felt that he should talk about things which don't concern Turkey ?

A very good one Echo_419,i agree with you on this,he should stay out of it,maybe he is like some Indians on this forum,talking about things they know nothing about and which doesnt concern them.

 

[Anubis]

Yea stop them ! First Indians acknowledged there own involvement in BD in 1971 , Its not matter about BD or Pak its about principles and unlawful acts in BD .Great job Turkey

How is it unlawful? He was tried in a court of LAW...that's as lawful as you can get. And regarding poking one's nose...in an ideal world it is Bangladesh's internal matter and shouldn't concern anyone...but given the historical context only two other country's can comment on it....India and Pakistan....Turkey and its leader's opinions have no place here.

Oh! wow, now Bangladesh is the province of the India?? @BDforever @Doyalbaba @Anubis @SHK @Khan saheb


and who the hell are you interfering in other's internal matter..

Either it was a typo or a pathetic attempt at trolling....I have a hunch it could be the later.

It does because they are an ally of Pakistan. And Bangladesh and Pakistan has signed the agreement on prosecutions.

P.S indians should be the last people to lecture as they are the first ones to poke their nasty noses in other people's affairs, be it South China Sea or Syrian refugees in Europe.

What agreement is this??

 

[Nilgiri]

Yep.



What is that thing? Who are the three parties?

"Yep"....classic rain man

 

[American Pakistani]

.


What agreement is this??

ISLAMABAD: Bangladesh has felt offended over Pakistan reminding it of its founding father’s promise contained in the 1974 tripartite agreement under which Dhaka had agreed not to proceed against those whom it had accused of ‘war crimes’ during the 1971 separation.

http://www.dawn.com/news/1221842

 

[Anubis]

http://www.dawn.com/news/1221842

https://www.icrc.org/casebook/doc/case-study/bangladesh-india-pakistan-1974-agreement-case-study.htm

Nizami and others who have been tried do not get protection under the agreement....the agreement talks about 195 POWs....Nizami was neither a POW nor is he a Pakistani citizen....Therefore Pakistan has absolutely nothing it can do about it...and Pakistan has no grounds to object either.

 

[Saiful Islam]

We will be losing a true patriot of undivided Pakistan, Ameer-e-nayab of Jamaat E Islam Bangladesh.