Safriz
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2010
- Messages
- 20,845
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Ok i am not here to Crash the party..But admit it this thread is a fanboy speculative thread based on Blogs and Random Artist impressions..No Nirbhay has been tested yet in single piece..
Yes the components may have been tested as shown in the pictures in this thread,but no evidence of the missile has been put together.
I read the whole thread,there is evidence of Inertial guidance,there is evidence of gps+glonass integration..But no evidence of TERCOM and DSMAC the two most important technologies for a cruise missile...
There is a picture of an active radar seeker..Why would a land attack Cruise missile need an active radar seeker? wont it compromise the stealth a cruise missile relies on?
Yes the components may have been tested as shown in the pictures in this thread,but no evidence of the missile has been put together.
I read the whole thread,there is evidence of Inertial guidance,there is evidence of gps+glonass integration..But no evidence of TERCOM and DSMAC the two most important technologies for a cruise missile...
There is a picture of an active radar seeker..Why would a land attack Cruise missile need an active radar seeker? wont it compromise the stealth a cruise missile relies on?