What's new

Nirbhay Cruise Missile Family Finally Revealed!

.
copying tomahawk with a ukrainian engine is no big deal -shut up
Your country men has accepted (on other thread ) that you have no technology to make a turbofan:blah:

Copying klub class missile and then claiming it indigenous....
 
.
Copying klub class missile and then claiming it indigenous....

Sadly the old wiki article about your Babur is updated..
Earlier article was much more intresting-it had specification in inches (instead of metres as in other wiki articles)
To say 'Babur is not tomahawk'!!!
each dimension translates to tomahawk dimension in metres:rofl:


Klub maximum range(3M-54 Klub)-300 km
 
.
Sadly the old wiki article about your Babur is updated..
Earlier article was much more intresting-it had specification in inches (instead of metres as in other wiki articles)
To say 'Babur is not tomahawk'!!!
each dimension translates to tomahawk dimension in metres:rofl:


Klub maximum range(3M-54 Klub)-300 km

guess we copy and range automatically becomes 4 times and when chinese copy russian engines, it refuses to fly :P
 
.
What ??? No plans to develope warship-launched/submarine-launched/surface-launched versions of this missile ....:hitwall:

Yes, the 750km Nirbhay-Mini only has air-launch version, with no booster attached.

Copying klub class missile and then claiming it indigenous....

Nonsense. Klub can't breathe beyond 300km. This baby here can hit upto 750km same range as Babur.

Full-fledged Nirbhay 1,200km variant is a class apart from all these Klubs, Mini-Nirbhays, Baburs, Raads etc. It compares with CJ-10 and BGM-109 most favourably.
 
. .
Something this Prasun guy is saying -

ALCMs don’t require faceting or shaping for low-observability, since they make use of terrain-hugging profiles to stay beyond the layered air-defence networks (see the bottommost visual posted above). Even for JASSM or Ra’ad to be launched from airborne platforms without interference, the target’s localised air-defences will first have to be neutralised or saturated via DEAD & SEAD air operations. All surface-launched LACMs are vulnerable to counter-strikes from airborne platforms armed with sensor-fuzed munitions. That’s why both the US & Russia have done away with such land-launched LACMs. Only China has them now along with Pakistan.
 
. . .
Klub-S

ORD_Klub-S_3M-14E_Display_lg.jpg


Tomahawk

tomahawk.jpg


Babur

Babur-1.jpg8ff77238-5dbe-4ed5-9ad5-883927bc045aLarger.jpg


Nirbhay

CM-2.jpg



NIRBHAY.jpg


DH-10 (china)

DH-10-1CS.jpg
 
.
can you post some evidence to back your claims?

The image of Nirbhay-Mini may not even be on-the-spot accurate representation, see, Prasun has
just cut off the booster motor from this image of Klub and labelled it Nirbhay-Mini, this pic is
also included in the article he posted -


@Safriz needs to do some observation and conduct some research before jumping to conclusions.:)

Klub-S

ORD_Klub-S_3M-14E_Display_lg.jpg


Tomahawk

tomahawk.jpg


Babur

Babur-1.jpg8ff77238-5dbe-4ed5-9ad5-883927bc045aLarger.jpg


Nirbhay

CM-2.jpg



NIRBHAY.jpg


DH-10 (china)

DH-10-1CS.jpg

The 5th pic is actually a Tomahawk labelled as Nirbhay as an artist impression.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
The image of Nirbhay-Mini may not even be on-the-spot accurate representation, see, Prasun has
just cut off the booster motor from this image of Klub and labelled it Nirbhay-Mini, this pic is
also included in the article he posted -


@Safriz needs to do some observation and conduct some research before jumping to conclusions.:)



The 5th pic is actually a Tomahawk labelled as Nirbhay as an artist impression.


every missil i posted are identical to each other!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
^^^ The thing is how can you claim the existence of a missile when nobody knows what it looks like?
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom