What's new

Nine Pakistani troops killed by militants: officials

Veeru

BANNED
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
2,609
Reaction score
0
Nine Pakistani troops killed by militants: officials

by Lehaz Ali

PESHAWAR, Pakistan — Militants ambushed Pakistani troops on Monday, killing nine soldiers in gunbattles and underscoring the gravity of the insurgent threat on the outskirts of the northwestern city of Peshawar.

“It was an ambush in the afternoon. It continued for two to three hours, and there have been casualties in the ambush. There have been killings of the terrorists as well,” military spokesman Major General Athar Abbas told AFP.

Other military and political officials in the northwest said nine troops from the Frontier Corps paramilitary were killed and three others wounded in the attack not far from Peshawar in the tribal district of Khyber, while at least 14 militants were killed.

Ambushes on such a deadly scale are rare, underscoring the pernicious Taliban-led insurgency plaguing the tribal areas and the challenges facing Pakistan in containing the unrest while under US pressure to take tougher action.

Peshawar is the main city in northwest Pakistan and a gateway to the semi-autonomous tribal areas on the Afghan border that Washington calls a haven for militants fighting in Afghanistan and a global headquarters of Al-Qaeda.

Khyber straddles the main land route for NATO supplies shipped to Pakistan’s port city of Karachi and driven across the border into Afghanistan.

“The militants attacked FC troops during a search operation. They came under attack from a small hill where militants were hiding,” the political agent of Khyber, Rehan Gul Khattak, told AFP.

At least 14 militants were killed in retaliatory fire in the Akakhel area of Bara district, the officials said.

“Fourteen militants have been killed and nine soldiers embraced martyrdom during an encounter in Akakhel,” a military spokesman told AFP.

The United States wants Pakistan to do more to wipe out militant havens and to open an offensive in North Waziristan, considered the premier insurgent bastion in the tribal belt and where leaders in the Al-Qaeda-linked Haqqani network are based.

It says eliminating militant sanctuaries in Pakistan’s tribal belt are vital to ending the 10-year war in Afghanistan and defeating Al-Qaeda.

But Pakistan has refused to open a new military front, arguing its troops are too overstretched, leaving American options largely limited to US drone strikes, of which more than 50 have been reported so far this year.

Nearly 4,700 people have been killed across Pakistan in attacks blamed on Taliban and Al-Qaeda-linked militants based in the northwestern tribal belt since government troops stormed a radical mosque in Islamabad in 2007.

Around 3,000 Pakistani soldiers have also lost their lives in attacks since 2001 when the country joined the war on terror.

On Monday, the UN refugee agency confirmed that 4,000 tribesmen who fled a Pakistani military operation in Mohmand, another of the seven districts in the tribal belt, had returned home, with the military saying calm had been restored.

The Nahqi camp, where the people had been staying, closed last week and all the families left voluntarily, UNHCR official Tim Irwin told AFP.

It had been established after conflict broke out in the tribal district of Mohmand, which lies on the Afghan border, in January, he said.

But although the military has claimed victory in a number of battles against militants, attacks have continued across the country.

UNHCR says more than 350,000 people displaced by conflict in the tribal belt are still living in host communities in the northwest.

Nine Pakistani troops killed by militants: officials | News | National Post

Raid on hideout in Pakistan sparks fighting that kills 9 Pakistani soldiers, 10 militants - The Washington Post
 
“Fourteen militants have been killed and nine soldiers embraced martyrdom during an encounter in Akakhel,” a military spokesman told AFP
What an attitude. Does he really think the soldiers wished to die to further the careers of incompetent or manipulative senior commanders rather than live to defeat the terrorists?
 
What an attitude. Does he really think the soldiers wished to die to further the careers of incompetent or manipulative senior commanders rather than live to defeat the terrorists?

Well, these soldiers were not Mexicans who get ready to fight wars for green card. These soldiers don't care about death and you know it very well. Remember how US exploited this mentality against Russians?
 
What an attitude. Does he really think the soldiers wished to die to further the careers of incompetent or manipulative senior commanders rather than live to defeat the terrorists?
What attitude?

---------- Post added at 12:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:08 PM ----------

What an attitude. Does he really think the soldiers wished to die to further the careers of incompetent or manipulative senior commanders rather than live to defeat the terrorists?

Apparently 'not fighting terrorists' earns Western condemnation, and, as seen here, fighting terrorists also earns Western 'condemnation' and slurs ...

Can't win can we? On the other hand, your intellectual dishonesty becomes quite clear ..
 
Can't win can we? On the other hand, your intellectual dishonesty becomes quite clear ..
Disappointment, not dishonesty. The soldiers were ambushed. Anytime that happens the competency of the commanders up the line should be called into question. Yet when was the last time a Pakistani general - or even somebody above the rank of major - was axed due to incompetence?
 
R.I.P. FC is majority pashtoon whom pak army uses as cannon forder to fight other pastoon taliban.So its basically like pashtoon vs pashtoon thinghy.Same as Northen light Infantry of Azad kashmir whom PA used as cannon fodder in Kargil and even refused to collect those martyrs dead bodies.Meanwhile majority punjabi PA enjoys all the moolaha aid from the usa and its pastoon who are taking burnt both ways.

What nonsense !! The Frontier Constabulary is a paramilitary force responsible for maintaining law and order in the country. Most of insurgency in Pakistan is in Pashtoon belt so obviously FC is responsible for maintenance of law and order there. For your very kind info PA enjoys a big chunk of Pashtoons, there were Pathan generals who served as COAS.

Kindly keep your dirty reasoning away from our soldiers.
 
Disappointment, not dishonesty. The soldiers were ambushed. Anytime that happens the competency of the commanders up the line should be called into question. Yet when was the last time a Pakistani general - or even somebody above the rank of major - was axed due to incompetence?

Don't your troops regularly get ambushed and IED'd?
 
What an attitude. Does he really think the soldiers wished to die to further the careers of incompetent or manipulative senior commanders rather than live to defeat the terrorists?
Ignorance is a bliss...!!
Are we missing something here.....did the brave soldiers die during a friendly war game or perhaps the commanders are taking credit for something they didn't deserve.
 
Disappointment, not dishonesty. The soldiers were ambushed. Anytime that happens the competency of the commanders up the line should be called into question. Yet when was the last time a Pakistani general - or even somebody above the rank of major - was axed due to incompetence?
Technically the FC is under the Interior Ministry, not the Army, though officers in the FC (many of whom have been martyred fighting with FC units) are seconded from the Army.

And as far as reducing casualties and detecting ambushes is concerned, a significant factor is troop protection, aerial surveillance in support of convoys and patrols, and better equipped soldiers.
 
Don't your troops regularly get ambushed and IED'd?
I doubt there's anything "regular" about it. But I can't imagine an Army spokesman, in detailing such an incident, praising dead heroes for very long. Reporters would soon pepper him with questions about the circumstances of the ambush and investigation into the incident.
 
What an attitude. Does he really think the soldiers wished to die to further the careers of incompetent or manipulative senior commanders rather than live to defeat the terrorists?

dying for a country is the biggest honour one could ask for......you, being a civilian your whole life, wouldn't ever understand
 
I doubt there's anything "regular" about it. But I can't imagine an Army spokesman, in detailing such an incident, praising dead heroes for very long. Reporters would soon pepper him with questions about the circumstances of the ambush and investigation into the incident.
Sure, but there is nothing wrong with praising the soldiers who lost their lives.

I really fail to understand your attitude towards this incident and the comments of the spokesperson - the only thing that explains it is your pathological, irrational hatred of Pakistan and a need to smear and denigrate it every chance you get.

---------- Post added at 12:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:29 PM ----------

dying for a country is the biggest honour one could ask for......you, being a civilian your whole life, wouldn't ever understand
His pathological hatred of Pakistan prevents him from understanding much about Pakistan period ...
 
Back
Top Bottom