Newton was wrong: Scientists dismiss Newton's theory of gravity and warn Einstein is next

[TNT]

https://www.express.co.uk/news/scie...theory-gravity-albert-einstein-black-hole/amp
is another paradigm shift inevitable
it seems thomas kuhn's philosophy of science is spot on what do you think
@Rusty

Newton being wrong was known long ago, its just that its now a fact that he was wrong.
Einstein theory still holds strong. The thing is its missing the link between quantum world and normal world physics.
Any theory that relate both quantum world and normal would be the theory of everything.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

American Scientific Journal quietly admitting the joker did not invent it by himself
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/was-einstein-the-first-to-invent-e-mc2/


Manhatten Project go find Einstine

 

[Thorough Pro]

Science is discovery of natural phenomenon and attempts to explain using mathematical models.
Faith is a set of beliefs generally surrounding a "supreme" power that created all the natural phenomenon called science and thus independent of and greater than already discovered and explained natural phenomenon called science.
How are the two comparable?

That's the beauty of the scientific method.
It's self correcting and there are no holy cows.

Our modern world is built on Newton, and here are scientists saying how he was wrong in certain aspects and no one is angry or name calling.

Can't say the same about faith

 

[Fawadqasim1]

That's the beauty of the scientific method.
It's self correcting and there are no holy cows.

Our modern world is built on Newton, and here are scientists saying how he was wrong in certain aspects and no one is angry or name calling.

Can't say the same about faith

You mean faith is alien to science there are no untested or untestable presupposition (axioms) in science.

 

[Rusty]

Science is discovery of natural phenomenon and attempts to explain using mathematical models.
Faith is a set of beliefs generally surrounding a "supreme" power that created all the natural phenomenon called science and thus independent of and greater than already discovered and explained natural phenomenon called science.
How are the two comparable?

They really are not.
I just ruffled some feathers when I said that I don't believe in ghosts as there is no evidence for them.

People get really touchy when you don't blindly believe what they believe.

You mean faith is alien to science there are no untested or untestable presupposition (axioms) in science.

If it's not testable, then it's not science, it's philosophy.

See string theory.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

It's not wrong. It could be improved. The basic gravity formula is correct. People used it to land on the moon in the 1960s. Simple but majestic formula. The gravitational constant G is one of the majestic constants of the universe.

 

[Fawadqasim1]

They really are not.
I just ruffled some feathers when I said that I don't believe in ghosts as there is no evidence for them.

People get really touchy when you don't blindly believe what they believe.



If it's not testable, then it's not science, it's philosophy.

See string theory.

I was talking about the the basic presumptions (axioms) of science string theory tau baad kee baat hay

 

[Rusty]

I was talking about the the basic presumptions (axioms) of science string theory tau baad kee baat hay

You know, just by using big words does not make you smarter or more right

As for the basic presumption of Science.
It's that everything real is testable that's pretty much it.
(also, science can be falsifiable (see I can use big words too) and no one will lynch you if you prove a theory or a scientist wrong)

also interesting note, it was actually Muslim arabs who codified the scientific method and allowed the world we live in today.
It's a tragedy that so many of their ancestors reject their work, while kafirs took their work and destroyed us with it.

 

[Fawadqasim1]

You know, just by using big words does not make you smarter or more right

As for the basic presumption of Science.
It's that everything real is testable that's pretty much it.
(also, science can be falsifiable (see I can use big words too) and no one will lynch you if you prove a theory or a scientist wrong)

also interesting note, it was actually Muslim arabs who codified the scientific method and allowed the world we live in today.
It's a tragedy that so many of their ancestors reject their work, while kafirs took their work and destroyed us with it.

Who can argue with such arrogance by the way my question was epistemological.

 

[Rusty]

Who can argue with such arrogance by the way my question was epistemological.

You know that you have no argument so you are just hiding behind words and semantics.

 

[Fawadqasim1]

You know that you have no argument so you are just hiding behind words and semantics.

Do you know what epistemology is
have you studied history and philosophy of science do you know the limitations and limits of what you believe in i am a former atheist and i used to offer sacrifices at the altar of science i don't have time or energy to write long articles so i am hinting/pointing at certain areas of interest its up to you. you want to study them or not

You know that you have no argument so you are just hiding behind words and semantics.

e.g materialism is one of the presuppositions of science can materialism be refuted using scientific method even after the empirical victory of copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics by niels bohr group.

 

[SIPRA]

e.g materialism is one the presupposition of science can materialism be refuted using scientific method even after the empirical victory of copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics by niels bohr group.

I don't understand the above quoted.

 

[Fawadqasim1]

I don't understand the above quoted.

Why sir can you elaborate
and I have corrected the post you can re read it I post via mobile so typos are inevitable sorry for that.

 

[SIPRA]

Why sir can you elaborate
and I have corrected the post you can re read it I post via mobile so typos are inevitable sorry for that.

Thanks. Still I don't get it. Do you mean that Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Phenomenon refutes Materialism.

 

[Fawadqasim1]

Thanks. Still I don't get it. Do you mean that Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Phenomenon refutes Materialism.

Yes all of it's classical understanding
if you conveniently keep on changing the goal post at will regarding the foundational and philosophical basis of you system no one can score a goal against you.

Yes all of it's classical understanding
if you conveniently keep on changing the goal post at will regarding the foundational and philosophical basis of you system no one can score a goal against you.

How clever