Oh now Ive got it why they were talking about per capita Income of 1024 a few days ago, because they are saying that based on new base system that the report did not mention. Poor reporting.
...............
Anyway, 2005 is very old, more recent should have been used.
I think new service like online freelancing, call centers service are not included. But who knows if these all are under the market value of IT sector only.
...................
And about the 60% real gpd robust growth, I think it is large because the volumes of new services and products added based on new baseyear are multiplied with their respective recent price. Suppose, a new product is added with the new baseyear system that has a price of 100 taka. Now if BD had produced that 10 years ago, the price of that new product could have been 50 taka, and then the real gdp growth would not be that much large like 60% today, because of using base year's price used in real gdp calculation. So the product is recent, and the price of that product is also recent, not past/base year's price, therefore the real gdp is much bigger now. And I think this large growth of real gpd is natural when new base year of gdp calculation is used, because there is not old base year price for newly added products,