What's new

New Afghanistan For Russia

. . .
Serbia was a superpower too in that time.

No it was not. Dusan empire was divided between small feudal lords after his death, and all those feudal lords were defeated one by one by Ottomans. Emperor Uros was a weak ruler without any real authority, and each part of the country was ruled by local feudal lords. Even during his life he was forced to accept Vukasin Mrnjavcevic as a co-ruler. And after Vukasin's death in the Battle of Maritsa (with many other Serbian southern feudal lords), Uros died not long after. After that it was feudal lord, against feudal lord...... For example Lazar Hrebeljanovic and King Tvrtko I Kotromanic against Nikola Altomanovic.
 
. .
@Hurshid Celebi

Turkey has cards with Turkic nations which some of them were a part of Ottoman empire and later on Soviet Union so if Russia goes against Turkey then it will also indirectly go against their former "allies"/territories.

Turkey isn't weak... Its a middle eastern super power afterall, stronger than Iran if I may say though I wish that ruling party of Turkey actually acted like Ottomans and respected minorities.

If your president and goverment was smart Hurshid then he would allow Kurdistan under condition that it is in federation with Turkey as a compromise between his and kurds agenda which would be a bonus if Iraq collapses and Turkey gains territory and even partial control over Syria.
 
.
@Hurshid Celebi

Turkey has cards with Turkic nations which some of them were a part of Ottoman empire and later on Soviet Union so if Russia goes against Turkey then it will also indirectly go against their former "allies"/territories.

Turkey isn't weak... Its a middle eastern super power afterall, stronger than Iran if I may say though I wish that ruling party of Turkey actually acted like Ottomans and respected minorities.

If your president and goverment was smart Hurshid then he would allow Kurdistan under condition that it is in federation with Turkey as a compromise between his and kurds agenda which would be a bonus if Iraq collapses and Turkey gains territory and even partial control over Syria.

He tried , but Western and some regional powers sabotized the process
 
.
New Afghanistan for India. We should say............
After all, India`s new terror partner for Pakistan!
 
. . .
If Russia has balls,
should now try to shot down one Turkish Jet.

Try to attack our Navy or even try a tactical missile (or artillery) attack / conventional or nuclear on Turkish Territory.

I would like see Russian boots try to enter Türkiye, it would be the greatest CEMETERY of Russia after WW 2.

By the recognised definition, these five countries are “undeclared nuclear weapons states”.

FULL CONTROL and secret ICBM s in ........ri ! For long time ! Thx our brothers and allies !

Belgium or Iran, Where’s The Nuclear Threat? Europe’s Five “Undeclared Nuclear Weapons States” | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization


Türkiye has balls and if we will be attacked and realy hurt, they will see our true WEAPON ARSENAL !

NO BLUFF :closed:
 
Last edited:
.
OFFICIAL :

"We are not hostile to Türkiye. We apologize for what happened!"

Rusya'da Ankara'ya eş zamanlı barış mesajları! - Milliyet Haber

IRAN offered to deliver more GAS with lower price (- 30%) to TÜRKIYE

İran'dan Türkiye'ye gazda indirim teklifi - Dünya Haberleri

@Serpentine

Whats going on ? Türkiye has cards .... ?

Iran say, if you give us a little free hand in Syria, you will get lower gas price. Maybe.

How so? In what way? How do you know?

Because western (German) media say so. Not to mention of other proofs.
 
.
NATO has 200 active tactical NUKES, half of them are in TÜRKIYE and
at least 40 under full TURKISH CONTROL !

TÜRKİYE'NİN KONTROLÜNDE 40 NÜKLEER BOMBA VAR - Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Mezunları Dayanışma Vakfı


Bu durumda ABD’nin Avrupa’daki toplam 200 nükleer bombasının yarısına yakınına Türkiye evsahipliği yapıyor.

Nükleer silahlarla ilgili uluslararası raporlarda, ABD’nin 2005-2008 yılları arasında Almanya’dan 130, İngiltere’den 110 ve İtalya’dan 40 nükleer silahı geri çekerken Türkiye, Belçika ve Hollanda’daki nükleer cephanenin sabit kaldığı ileri sürülüyor.

NATO Sözcüsü James Appathurai, düzenlediği basın toplantısında, Belçika Senatosunun Avrupa’daki nükleer silahları tartıştığının hatırlatılması üzerine “NATO’nun hiçbir nükleer silahı yok. Nükleer silahlar üye ülkelere ait. NATO komutasında hiçbir (nükleer) silah yok” dedi.

Amerikan Bilim Adamları Federasyonu ve İtalyan Silahsızlanma Bilim Adamları Birliği başta olmak üzere çeşitli kaynaklarca, 2009 yılı itibariyle Türkiye’de İncirlik üssünde 90 nükleer bombanın bulunduğunu iddia edilirken, bunların 50’sinin ABD ve 40’ının evsahibi ülke (Türkiye) kontrolünde olduğu ileri sürülüyor.

Bu durumda ABD’nin Avrupa’daki toplam 200 nükleer bombasının yarısına yakınına Türkiye evsahipliği yapıyor.

Nükleer silahlarla ilgili uluslararası raporlarda, ABD’nin 2005-2008 yılları arasında Almanya’dan 130, İngiltere’den 110 ve İtalya’dan 40 nükleer silahı geri çekerken Türkiye, Belçika ve Hollanda’daki nükleer cephanenin sabit kaldığı ileri sürülüyor.


301120112344443940416_3.jpg
 
.
Back
Top Bottom