Nepal Parliament passed Bill putting Kalapani, Limpiyadhura & Lipu Lekh in its official map

[Secularindian]

We want to resolve the issue with India through peaceful talks at the political and diplomatic levels," Prachanda, the former Maoist rebel chief, who still goes by his war nom de guerre, said in Parliament on Saturday.

MEA is not Even interested in talking them it seems.Sangi's are To proud

 

[manga]

To stop you from massacring innocent Kashmiri Muslims and changing demography is IOK.

Oh so howzit going , the Twitter war ?
Is it preventing any demographic change or killing of terrorists ?

 

[American Pakistani]

Oh so howzit going , the Twitter war ?
Is it preventing any demographic change or killing of terrorists ?

It is giving burns to Bharti occupier terrorists r3@r.

Grand dream. One look of PDF by a Nepali and the Hindu hate of Pakistanis is like an open book. The Nepali Govt may be anti-India but people-2-people relations between the Hindu brothers is strong. While some may have sold their souls to China, there are many others who haven't. This will change once the people realize intent based on own goals vs real brothers.

Nobody hate Hindus. Pakistanis dislike Bharti Hindutva terrorists.

 

[Kamikaze Pilot]

On an average every year, how many Nepali cadets does PMA train every year? @Aasimkhan @crankthatskunk

- PRTP GWD

 

[Peshwa]

Since you're moving from Tibet to Kashmir as the subject matter, India STILL hasn't reclaimed the half of Kashmir that Pakistan snatched in 1947 so do enlighten me on how that squares up with your maps. It's now a matter of time before the rest falls, all thanks to hindutva no less.

The purpose of bringing in Kashmir to compare to the topic at hand (Nepalese map change) is to draw similarities and learn from the righteous Pakistanis on how to deal with such a situation, since Pakistan has been facing this all along. I suppose it would also perhaps help Pakistanis to temper their reaction to such news given their own inability to control or change the passing of resolutions in other countries without any material change on the ground.

and on topic, the similarities between the two situations exist:
1. Just like Nepal, India made a unilateral change in the status of a territory.
2. India does claim GB and P0K in entirety. That claim exists (including on maps), similar to Nepal’s, but no action to wrest the areas from the “occupier” has been initiated or fruitful.

Pakistan has never been your "buddy". We're here to dismember your pseudo-country and restore it to its rightful place as the sick man of the subcontinent. However, I was always taught by Indian friends that Nepal was part of hindutva's inner circle, a peaceful hindu majority nation who would work with India for millennia to come, right?

I do love honesty. So at least you’re honest with your intentions.
I’ve always known Pakistanis to be very emotional people with a very simplistic zero sum game mentality when it comes to relationships.
Nepal’s politics and it’s people are two different things. The “inner circle” of Hinduism is a reference to the acceptance of their people of similar faith, much like Pakistan’s relations with Iran. However, Nepal’s politics under Oli has changed and so as a nation, they may not be as aligned with India.
So you equating all relationships to remain the same (politics and people to people) is either you being simple or playing dumb to score brownie points against the indian forum members. Either of those choices is fine.
I just expected you to be a more pragmatic chap who understood these intricacies.

Pakistan was opposed to Delhi in 1947, as it was in 2019. Nothing has really changed between you and me. It's your buddies you should now worry about, not your lifelong enemies.

“You make peace with your enemies, not your friends”
Nepal will remain India’s friend, and this will be solved diplomatically. My only concern is for Pakistanis cheerleading from the side for a war between India and Nepal. Unfortunately, they maybe terribly disappointed with the result.

 

[SrNair]

MEA is not Even interested in talking them it seems.Sangi's are To proud

Yup.
For the past 6 months they are doing same .
If they have proof let them go to UN .

 

[Longhorn]

Yup.
For the past 6 months they are doing same .
If they have proof let them go to UN .

So you waste more time and ignore another UN resolution that doesn't suit you?
No one trusts you anymore.
Your name is mud.

 

[AZ1]

Yup.
For the past 6 months they are doing same .
If they have proof let them go to UN .

haha ok so you will agree to UN then what about the UN decision about kashmir?

 

[SrNair]

So you waste more time and ignore another UN resolution that doesn't suit you?
No one trusts you anymore.
Your name is mud.

As if we cares about somebodys trust .
Lol

haha ok so you will agree to UN then what about the UN decision about kashmir?

You can go to the UN only if you have supporting evidence .
Nepal can easily go considering Chinese support .
But they wont .

J&K is an integral part of India and that is not the subject here

 

[Longhorn]

As if we cares about somebodys trust .
Lol



You can go to the UN only if you have supporting evidence .
Nepal can easily go considering Chinese support .
But they wont .

J&K is an integral part of India and that is not the subject here

According to the UN, which you are advocating for Nepal, Kashmir is a disputed territory complete with it's own UN observer group.

 

[crankthatskunk]

On an average every year, how many Nepali cadets does PMA train every year? @Aasimkhan @crankthatskunk

- PRTP GWD

Well, none. Why would we!!

 

[SrNair]

According to the UN, which you are advocating for Nepal, Kashmir is a disputed territory complete with it's own UN observer group.

So ?
Who cares ?
That was decades before .
Now no more .

 

[vishwambhar]

Let Corona trouble go and then I wish India to merge Nepal into Indian union like Sikkim.....

Nepalese are asking for a small Indian territory but we kind hearted Indians are ready to offer them whole intercontinental sized India on the platter....

 

[Longhorn]

So ?
Who cares ?
That was decades before .
Now no more .

That's ok mate.
We get it, might is right.
We get that your word means nothing to you.
But a man and a nation are known by their reputation. No action is without consequence.
History will judge us all.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

The purpose of bringing in Kashmir to compare to the topic at hand (Nepalese map change) is to draw similarities and learn from the righteous Pakistanis on how to deal with such a situation, since Pakistan has been facing this all along. I suppose it would also perhaps help Pakistanis to temper their reaction to such news given their own inability to control or change the passing of resolutions in other countries without any material change on the ground.

and on topic, the similarities between the two situations exist:
1. Just like Nepal, India made a unilateral change in the status of a territory.
2. India does claim GB and P0K in entirety. That claim exists (including on maps), similar to Nepal’s, but no action to wrest the areas from the “occupier” has been initiated or fruitful.



I do love honesty. So at least you’re honest with your intentions.
I’ve always known Pakistanis to be very emotional people with a very simplistic zero sum game mentality when it comes to relationships.
Nepal’s politics and it’s people are two different things. The “inner circle” of Hinduism is a reference to the acceptance of their people of similar faith, much like Pakistan’s relations with Iran. However, Nepal’s politics under Oli has changed and so as a nation, they may not be as aligned with India.
So you equating all relationships to remain the same (politics and people to people) is either you being simple or playing dumb to score brownie points against the indian forum members. Either of those choices is fine.
I just expected you to be a more pragmatic chap who understood these intricacies.





“You make peace with your enemies, not your friends”
Nepal will remain India’s friend, and this will be solved diplomatically. My only concern is for Pakistanis cheerleading from the side for a war between India and Nepal. Unfortunately, they maybe terribly disappointed with the result.

Suddenly Indians have become pragmatic overnight!

Pakistan's strategies and tactics are our own, not to be shared with every Tom, dick and Harry.

This newfound "pragmatic approach" is truly a remarkable turn of events, especially when your elected leaders are anything but pragmatic and prefer perpetual Bollywood showmanship and belligerence with India's neighbours. You may well try to soften the blows of recent weeks with all sorts of unrelated analogies, obfuscations and rationalisations, but the underlying facts remain. The times, they are a'changin', and it's Modi you should be blamin'.

Pakistan in fact warned you of this outcome in recent months. Had you but listened when there was still time. The door that was slightly ajar for decades is suddenly shut.

"I’ve always known Pakistanis to be very emotional people with a very simplistic zero sum game mentality when it comes to relationships."

You know, some introspection is warranted here. Indians are now the ones manoeuvring themselves into positions with purely binary outcomes. Hindustan has unilaterally removed any grey areas with room for manoeuvre with ALL of its neighbours. India has put itself into positions from which there can only be two potential outcomes - India's way or not India's way. Call it what you will but it's shortsighted and dangerous politics to play with multiple powerful neighbours. India is certainly in no position to be critical of Pakistan on "zero sum games".

If Modi doesn't get that piece of Ladakh back from China, he will be seen as weak and having failed - this is the zero sum game that Modi has foolishly created for himself. It's worse than Doklam.