What's new

Nawaz will never speak against India. This is the reason!

Dont try to put words in my mouth, i expect better from you. Show me where have i said Pakistan needs to destroy India but if you are so naive let me spill it out for you
Then you should have enlightened us all about what are the national interests of Pakistan?
Our national interest includes Kashmir, Water, Siachen, Sir creek. What is Nawaz stance on these all, absolutely nothing and he made it clear when he visited India and did not met Kashmiri leadership,
Would meeting Kashmiri leadership done any marvel for Kashmir cause? PMs in the past have been meeting huriyat leaders, has this brought any diplomatic gains on Kashmir? Mark my words, a diplomatically and economically strong Pakistan would be the biggest help to Kashmir. Today the international community shrugs off Pakistan's view of Kashmir thanks to Indian propaganda and successfully tagging Kashmir freedom movement as a terrorist movement. Had Kargil not happened Pakistan would have still salvaged something from Kashmir.

If you dont consider them natonal interest, than Khuda he Hafiz ha is mulk or qoom ka. Kabbi kisi Indian sa baat ker ka dekho phir Idea ho ga kaisa for apna interests ko foremost rakhta hain,
And here comes a desperate rant.

This is not an Imran versus Nawaz thing. Its about Pakistan's national interest. And as for Afghanistan you are dead wrong their as well. Before i go off topic and get accused of derailing the thread may i ask you to read the history of Afghanistan and their enmity towards Pakistan which was long before Pakistan decided to meddle in Afghanistan.
I never said Pakistan had brotherly relationships with Afghanistan but the hatred certainly amplified after the intervention in the name of Afghan Jihad. Never had Afghanistan openly harbored the enemies of Pakistan before 1980....
 
.
Nawaz is a business man. He has business interests in India which is why he is so keen in improving relations with India even at the cost of Pakistan which is why no business man should be a PM of any country.
Is there anything wrong with having business relations with India? It will benefit both countries immensely, especially Pakistan.

Trade between India and China at present stands at $75 billion slated to touch $100 billion by next year and $500 billion by 2020. In contrast, Indo-Pak trade is a measly $2.5 billion!

Pakistani industrialists and businessmen see joint ventures with India which have tremendous potential like:

Outsourcing
Cross-border banking facilities
Technology transfers in agriculture and industry
Indian Special Economic Zones in Pakistan near the border
Opening up of Munabao-Khokhrapar route for trade and people-to-people movement
Facilitative visa regime
Mutual recognition of standards


The above is not the Pak government's but the business community's ideas for joint ventures which they want to be fast tracked.

The overall impact would be that trade and investment would be the designated game-changer that should, in the long run, bring about regional economic integration. A receptive Indian market for Pakistani products would be the ideal confidence-building measure that is so essential in thwarting the ulterior designs of hardliners and naysayers like you! :P :D
 
.
Nawaz is a business man. He has business interests in India which is why he is so keen in improving relations with India even at the cost of Pakistan which is why no business man should be a PM of any country.

If his interests were for the sake of development in Pakistan, then there is no reason to oppose. But all his focus is to flourish his own business which is reflecting on the foreign affairs of Pakistan.
 
Last edited:
.
Nawaz is a business man. He has business interests in India which is why he is so keen in improving relations with India even at the cost of Pakistan which is why no business man should be a PM of any country.

It is in Pakistans interest to improve relations with India..War with India is going to be bad for your economy.
 
.
Then you should have enlightened us all about what are the national interests of Pakistan?

Perhaps you need to read a bit more before pressing the reply button.

Would meeting Kashmiri leadership done any marvel for Kashmir cause? PMs in the past have been meeting huriyat leaders, has this brought any diplomatic gains on Kashmir? Mark my words, a diplomatically and economically strong Pakistan would be the biggest help to Kashmir. Today the international community shrugs off Pakistan's view of Kashmir thanks to Indian propaganda and successfully tagging Kashmir freedom movement as a terrorist movement. Had Kargil not happened Pakistan would have still salvaged something from Kashmir.

No marvel but a symbolic gesture that Pakistan supports Kashmiris right to self determination. Nawaz gave the exact opposite. And please dont bring in Kargil, there are pictures of Nawaz taking briefings on Kargil, you really believe he had no clue?:rolleyes:

And here comes a desperate rant.

If you say so.

I never said Pakistan had brotherly relationships with Afghanistan but the hatred certainly amplified after the intervention in the name of Afghan Jihad. Never had Afghanistan openly harbored the enemies of Pakistan before 1980....

Than what are you saying. Pakistan does not have brotherly relations with Afghanistan yet we shouldn't do anything about it? Do you really think that by not involving in Afghanistan, Afghanistan would had remained neutral specially with the soviets there? You are more naive than I think you were.

For your information:

Pakistan and Afghanistan | Institute for the Study of War

From the same article:

After Pakistan’s creation in 1947, Afghanistan objected to its admission to the United Nations. The Afghan government of the time decided not to recognize Pakistan as the legitimate inheritor of the territorial agreements reached with the British India. There were several ambiguous and often changing demands from Kabul centered around the aspirations—as Kabul saw it—of the Pashtun and Baluch ethnicities inside Pakistan. For intermittent periods between 1947 and 1973, Kabul extended support to Baluch and Pashtun nationalists inside Pakistan and even called for the creation of a new state called “Pashtunistan.” In 1973, Pakistan, grappling with territorial insecurities, resorted to extending support to Islamists dissidents that opposed Afghanistan’s Republican government of Sardar Daud. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s government created the “Afghan Cell” within Pakistan’s foreign office and assigned it a policy that included strengthening ties with and empowering Islamists in exile in Pakistan, and improving Pakistan’s influence over governments in Kabul.

Sardar Daud made friendly gestures to Pakistan in the late 1970s, but his overtures were cut short by a Communist coup in 1978. The new regime in Kabul returned to the support—at least rhetorical—for Pashtun and Baluch nationalists in Pakistan. The 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan was seen by Pakistan as a grave threat to its national security. It also presented Pakistan with a major avenue to build on its 1973 policy of empowering dissident Islamists against the governments in Kabul. Furthermore, Pakistan had been a partner of the United States in the Cold War since the 1950s, and this cooperation had provoked numerous Soviet threats over the years.

Read the dates i have highlighted them for you. There are many other good books which can provide with greater insight on this and what led Pakistan to intervene in Afghanistan. Any country would have done the same.

Like i said before read more, reply less. This isn't Imran versus Nawaz thing that you feel the need to reply every single time just for the sake of it.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom