What's new

Nato Vs Pakistan : Role of China and India?

:sniper:

First of all you being typical indians didnt get the purpose of this thread.... its to discuss gobal outcome of recent action of both sides i-e Nato and Pakistan

Secondly where did in my first post its saying anything against India???

thirdly one thing you dint get is NATO needs Pakistan more now then Pakistan needs NATO in afghanistan

Pakistan have already finished up with TTP.... now its your turn :sniper:

Dont estimate Pakistanies.....
Pakistani and Afghanistanies can tackle NATO and USA, without the help of China and anyother country...

I never put India anywhere in my post,my response was completely in ur terms about NATO and Pakistan

NATO needs u does not means that u can go their and scare them,how actually u plan to defeat NATO:rofl:

Dont put afghan with u,they r already exhausted with ur attrocities
 
.
:sniper:

First of all you being typical indians didnt get the purpose of this thread.... its to discuss gobal outcome of recent action of both sides i-e Nato and Pakistan
Secondly where did in my first post its saying anything against India???

thirdly one thing you dint get is NATO needs Pakistan more now then Pakistan needs NATO in afghanistan

Pakistan have already finished up with TTP.... now its your turn :sniper:

Dont estimate Pakistanies.....
Pakistani and Afghanistanies can tackle NATO and USA, without the help of China and anyother country...


No global outcome friend. Some chest thumping by Defence.pk members. Diplomatic noise by GoP. Behind the door understanding with NATO (I think it already exists). Some strong words. A blocked convoy for a week. Then every thing back to normal

All the bluster is for the consumption of the misguided public and the Afghan Taliban. More so for the latter. Since so far AT has not been attacking Pakistan. But if Pakistan opens its borders for NATO forces to come in and attack AT, then AT will wage war on Pakistan too..

So basically self preservation on the part of GoP
 
.
I never put India anywhere in my post,my response was completely in ur terms about NATO and Pakistan

NATO needs u does not means that u can go their and scare them,how actually u plan to defeat NATO:rofl:

Dont put afghan with u,they r already exhausted with ur attrocities

We dont need to defeat NATO :) afghans are more then enough for them :) :sniper:


Afghan are always Pakistan as Pakistan is just like thier 2nd home after afganistan... and its just nato baased kabul gov which favors india otherwise each and every afghan is with Pakistan..... wait and time will tell you....

:pakistan:
 
.
No global outcome friend. Some chest thumping by Defence.pk members. Diplomatic noise by GoP. Behind the door understanding with NATO (I think it already exists). Some strong words. A blocked convoy for a week. Then every thing back to normal

All the bluster is for the consumption of the misguided public and the Afghan Taliban. More so for the latter. Since so far AT has not been attacking Pakistan. But if Pakistan opens its borders for NATO forces to come in and attack AT, then AT will wage war on Pakistan too..

So basically self preservation on the part of GoP


you post make no sence you know... Pakistan already asked to put fence on the border. and they declined WHY?....

When Pakistan fought against TTP then why did NATO left Afghan side border post just coz TTP can hide inside Afghanistan???

NATO is loosing war in Afghanistan......

:pakistan:
 
.
For a England born American, your english is pretty incoherent.

you post make no sence you know... Pakistan already asked to put fence on the border. and they declined WHY?....
Why does Pakistan need permission from NATO to put a fence on their side.

When Pakistan fought against TTP then why did NATO left Afghan side border post just coz TTP can hide inside Afghanistan???
because TTP is Hindu/Zionist/American agent??

NATO is loosing war in Afghanistan......
OK
 
.
NATO/US will never Wage war against us......
We won't wage a war against them, unless they do something real bad.
India's role-Sit back and watch.
China's role-Supply equipment to Pakistan
 
.
NATO/US will never Wage war against us......
We won't wage a war against them, unless they do something real bad.
India's role-Sit back and watch.
China's role-Supply equipment to Pakistan

simple correction.


indian role sit n watch in afganistan.
 
.
for you kind info lot of Pakistanies born in these countries and still they are proud Pakistanies and not like Indian who gave thier nationality the day they get british of American Green Cards....

This is false..
 
.
NATO/US will never Wage war against us......
We won't wage a war against them, unless they do something real bad.
India's role-Sit back and watch.
China's role-Supply equipment to Pakistan

As one member said our(India) role is the most convinient.
No harm to ourselves while being guarenteed full time Tamasha all around us.
 
Last edited:
.
With regards to allying with the Taliban, the US would rather see Pakistan become a nuclear wasteland or become part of India again than to see the Taliban gain control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal. Least bad option would be to take control/ destroy the nuclear components before they are assembled.

:Edit: If India was offered Pakistan on a silver NATO platter I seriously doubt they'd accept. They'd be dooming themselves to a generations long guerilla war that would put to shame the maoists.
 
.
With regards to allying with the Taliban, the US would rather see Pakistan become part of India again than to see Pakistan under the Taliban.

That isn't going to endear you to the Pakistani members here.

The question is, do you have the ability to force Pakistan to become a part of India? Or to stop the Taliban?
 
.
With regards to allying with the Taliban, the US would rather see Pakistan become a nuclear wasteland or become part of India again than to see the Taliban gain control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal.
That is not going to happen, our nukes are safe...
The only way we will become a nuclear wasteland is if someone nukes us, and if someone does, we nuke them...:toast_sign:
 
. .
With regards to allying with the Taliban, the US would rather see Pakistan become a nuclear wasteland or become part of India again than to see the Taliban gain control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal. Least bad option would be to take control/ destroy the nuclear components before they are assembled.

:Edit: If India was offered Pakistan on a silver NATO platter I seriously doubt they'd accept. They'd be dooming themselves to a generations long guerilla war that would put to shame the maoists.

Then, I do not understand what to worry about Taliban, since U.S was a large Taliban? So, do not worry about Taliban.
 
Last edited:
.
That is not going to happen, our nukes are safe...
The only way we will become a nuclear wasteland is if someone nukes us, and if someone does, we nuke them...:toast_sign:

Granted that is what is always hoped for (keep nukes safe out of Talib/terrorist hands etc);), that's why all the actions I stated above would be bad, it would be a matter of limiting damage in the scenario, not having gain.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom