What's new

National Tokomak Fusion Program is back in PSDP!

Karl

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
152
Reaction score
0
.
This is essential for our scientists to learn about the energy generation as a result of fusion. This knowledge would be essential for designing better thermonuclear weapons. Yes, there are 'designs' available on Wikipedia, but since we can't just build a device and test it, we need the first hand grounds up knowledge of how thermonuclear reactions proceed.

@The Deterrent @The SC
 
.
National Tokomak Fusion Program ia back in PSDP!

Pakistan's metallic (not GLAST!) Tokamak reactor is back in the 2017 -2018 budget, albeit with 'unapproved status. Total cost is 423.509 million RP with 100 milion to be spent 2017 -2018.

Expect it to be similar to China's now decommissioned HT-7

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HT-7

http://tempest.das.ucdavis.edu/pdg/HT7/HT7new.html

http://pc.gov.pk/uploads/archives/PSDP_2017-18.pdf
Good news ... is there anyone who knows status of our small reactor experiment to be used on submarine propulsion ...
 
. .
This is essential for our scientists to learn about the energy generation as a result of fusion. This knowledge would be essential for designing better thermonuclear weapons. Yes, there are 'designs' available on Wikipedia, but since we can't just build a device and test it, we need the first hand grounds up knowledge of how thermonuclear reactions proceed.

@The Deterrent @The SC
Metal Better Than Carbon for ITER Fusion Reactor, Award-Winning Study Confirms

Metal, rather than carbon, is better suited as material for the inside wall of tokamaks — the experimental machines designed to harness fusion energy — according to the paper that won the IAEA’s 2016 Nuclear Fusion Journal Prize this week. Using metal in the fusion reactor reduces safety hazards that may result from unwanted chemical reactions involving carbon.
...

Brezinsek and his co-authors conducted experiments at the Joint European Torus (JET) in the United Kingdom, the world’s largest operating tokamak. The findings have confirmed the hypothesis that the operation of plasma—the fuel in which all particles are ionized and can react to a magnetic field—in a tokamak is compatible with metallic walls. This, in turn, means that the materials to be used for the walls in ITER—the world’s largest future tokamak to demonstrate fusion energy production at industrial scale—will result in a significantly reduced trapping of tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen in the fuel.

Tokamaks have been developed over the last decades to enable controlled fusion reactions in a vacuum vessel containing a magnetic field. Because the temperature needed to make fusion reactions possible is in the order of 100 million degrees Celsius, the wall of the vacuum vessel must be protected from the heat emanating from the plasma. Historically, this was done using heat-resistant carbon materials. Due to safety concerns, the total amount of tritium allowed within the vacuum vessel must be kept below a certain limit – which posed a difficulty when carbon was used.

To overcome this problem, ITER was designed to operate with plasma-facing components made of metallic elements that are less reactive to tritium. A replica of the ITER wall was built at JET to conduct various sets of experiments, including those which have now validated the choice of the plasma-facing materials made for ITER.

The experiments conducted by Brezinsek and his colleagues confirmed the use of beryllium and tungsten as plasma-facing materials for the nuclear operation phase of the ITER device.

“The experiment shows that tritium trapping is very much reduced with a beryllium wall,” said Bastiaan J. Braams, Unit Head of Atomic and Molecular Data at the IAEA. “It supports the choice of beryllium for the ITER wall.”

Nuclear fusion, the process that powers the sun, has the potential to provide a virtually unlimited supply of clean, carbon-free energy. ITER’s goal is to allow scientists to study plasmas under conditions similar to those expected in a future fusion power plant. It is planned to produce 500 MW of fusion power.

...

https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/new...r-fusion-reactor-award-winning-study-confirms
 
. .
This has to be a joke or cover for something else.

Nopes, I have seen seniors on the forum saying this goes back to circa 2007/9. We've had a tokamak reactor in the country for a while. Whether it's operational and research is being performed or not, that is another question.
 
.
Nopes, I have seen seniors on the forum saying this goes back to circa 2007/9. We've had a tokamak reactor in the country for a while. Whether it's operational and research is being performed or not, that is another question.

Do you want to quote the "seniors" .. just tag them here.
 
. .
what are the achivements of our scientist relating tokamak since 2008 please anyone ?
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom