I'm sorry. The man is a very well known former (speculatively) member of the BLA. Which translates into a traitor, mutineer, anti-state actor, etc. And you chose to defend this "sane" man? You don't need this picture or any other to realise who or what he is. Pray tell me what facts are these that you speak of? A bird? Isn't that his source for all of his "analyses"?
Read your own post..
First you said well known.. then you said "speculatively".. which means you are speculating based on what well known?
How does one realize who he is? Unless of course I've already got a made up opinion and will believe anything degrading about it him just because I disagree with his opinion??
Facts are events that occur on the ground.. as they do. Not what we construe of it... unless off course you are prone to thinking that Zaid Hamid is factually correct.