Nadeem F Paracha insults Allama Iqbal.

[Multani]

The thing is, an engineering student is studying SCIENCE whereas a religious student is studying OPINIONS and INTERPRETATIONS. In Science, there are hypothesises, empirical evidence, data and all that jazz. Theology? Assessing scriptures, verses, and quotes which go back hundreds of years ago and then tryong to make assumptions with them.

It's easy to be taught the "wrong thing" when studying theology. There are countless different opinions, views, and beliefs which one has to choose, each of them saying different things on different issues. That's completely the opposite when you're studying science. If a professor tells a student that frogs have 2 brains or that cars run on chocolate sauce, you can easily find out yourself by browsing the web or conducting an experiment. But what if a scholar told his student that the Holy Prophet (pbuh) approved of a veil which only covered the head? How can you tell if he did or didn't? You'll need to read the INTERPRETATIONS of scholars, which is something you can't completely verify.

And finally, enough with this "muh feelings" nonsense. Frankly, those who get hurt over silly statements and other peoples views should be given a good kick. Instead of whining about "muh feelings", try to respond with something constructive?

Now that is certainly a rant. Well, Black Holes did exist recently, but no more. Sorry but you are incorrect. A religious student studies grammar, morphology, exegesis [ a Qur'anic ] etc. which are all VALID bodies of knowledge.

Since Nadi follows the Qur'an and Sunnah, Nadi must be reading Islamic books. And those Islamic books must be written by Some Islamic Scholar, who studied Islamic Sciences. If Nadi reads the Hadith Collections directly, then those Collections were also compiled by Islamic Scholars, who went through formal Islamic Schooling. So, Nadi does follow Islamic Scholars in one way or another.

 

[Hiptullha]

Now that is certainly a rant. Well, Black Holes did exist recently, but no more. Sorry but you are incorrect. A religious student studies grammar, morphology, exegesis [ a Qur'anic ] etc. which are all VALID bodies of knowledge.

The views on black holes are changing due to evidence, and data constantly being presented by different sides of the community. Scientists like to completely verify things which is why shaky areas in the scientific world such as black holes are constantly being disputed.
Grammar and Morphology aren't exactly completely related to religion. Regardless of the fact that their studied or not, in the end, the student will only analyse the text according to his own opinion. Yes, religious students study Tafsir. But there are so many different methods of tafsir, different schools of tafsir, and views on if tafsir is allowed or not. Which one is correct?