Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mig Project 1.44This is photoshop, and the plane here is a cancelled Sukhoi project. Forgot the name, will get back with it soon.
This is photoshop, and the plane here is a cancelled Sukhoi project. Forgot the name, will get back with it soon.
The second Jet is somewhat closer to Mig Project 1.44 but still there are many differences if you compare this image with Mig Project 1.44 images.Mig Project 1.44
I don't think so man , that must be one hell of a photoshop.
This is photoshop, and the plane here is a cancelled Sukhoi project. Forgot the name, will get back with it soon.
Mig Project 1.44
In October 1985, the Defense Agency began considering three development options for the FSX: domestic development, adoption of an existing domestic model, or adoption of a foreign model.
The agency originally favored domestic development.
The Japan Defense Agency's research and development arm, the Technical Research and Development Institute, announced that, except for the engine, Japan possessed the domestic capability to develop an advanced fighter for about $1 billion.
But by late 1986, after consultation and much pressure from the United States, it decided to consider a coproduction agreement with the United States.
And in October 1987, Japanese and United States defense officials meeting in Washington decided on a joint project to remodel either the F-15 or the F-16.
In November 1988, the United States and Japan agreed to cooperatively develop the FS-X fighter aircraft, basing its design on Lockheed's F-16 Block 40 fighter aircraft.
Once the agreement was reached, it came under heavy criticism from members of the United States Congress concerned about loss of key United States technologies and technological leadership, risks of Japanese commercialization of technology at United States expense, and an insufficient share in the project for United States-based firms.
As a result of the controversy, in early 1989 the United States demanded and obtained a review and revision of the agreement, restricting technology transfer and specifying that United States-based firms would receive 40 percent of the work.
The controversy left bitterness on both sides, and Japanese industrialists, convinced that a Japanese-designed and Japanese developed FSX would be superior to a modified F-16 codeveloped by Japan and the United States, were irritated at United States pressure to renegotiate.
They considered the agreement already favorable to the United States.
Japanese industrialists and defense planners seem to be inclined to be self sufficient with respect to future weapons research.